Waste Management & Biomass News April 2021 Compiled by 1st Choice Waste
Waste management and biomass fuels are never far from the UK news. With World Earth Day during April, US President Biden hosting a conference of world leaders and the UK being the world’s first major economy to present a net zero Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy, this month has been more newsworthy than most. 1st Choice Waste (waste management and biomass company in Teesside) compiles the most interesting of the recent news.
World Earth Days – 51st Anniversary
On April 22nd, the 51st World Earth Day was celebrated and President Biden hosted a conference of 40 world leaders to discuss the issue of climate change. At the conference and in a statement posted on The White House website, President Biden President Biden fulfilled his promise to rejoin the Paris Agreement and set a course for the United States to tackle the climate crisis at home and abroad, reaching net zero emissions economy-wide by no later than 2050. As part of re-entering the Paris Agreement, he also launched a whole-of-government process, organized through his National Climate Task Force, to establish this new 2030 emissions target – known as the “nationally determined contribution” or “NDC,” a formal submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
The full proclamation reads ”
On April 22, 1970, millions of Americans rallied together to protect the right of all of us to live free from environmental hazard and harm. On that first Earth Day, they gathered all across America — on college campuses, in public parks, and State capitals — galvanized by a vision of a healthier, more prosperous Nation where all people could thrive. Their untiring spirit sparked a national movement for environmental protection that endures today in the bedrock laws that protect the air we breathe, the water we drink, and treasured wild places and wildlife.
Earth Day was primarily conceived and brought to life by a dedicated public servant: the late Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin. Senator Nelson and his wife, Carrie Lee -– who herself passed away just last month –- were both dear friends who changed my life; it was Senator Nelson who helped persuade me to remain in the Senate after losing my first wife and daughter in a car accident in 1972. Senator Nelson changed the world, too, by building a legacy of environmental protection through Earth Day and all of the progress that has come in its wake –- not because it was popular, but because it was the right thing to do for our children and grandchildren.
Over half a century later, that legacy lives on in the chorus of courageous young people across the world who are rising up to demand action on climate change. They recognize the enormous economic opportunity to build a brighter, more prosperous future, and the dire economic, societal, and national security consequences of failing to act. Our youth remind us that a better world is within our grasp. Today, I say to young people fighting for a brighter future: We hear you. We see you. We will not let you down.
In recent years, climate change has upended the lives of millions of Americans. Record cold weather knocked out the electric grid in Texas this winter, killing at least 111 people and disrupting the lives and livelihoods of millions more. Wildfires tore through more than 5 million acres across the American West — an area roughly the size of the entire State of New Jersey burned to the ground. Last year, back-to-back hurricanes and powerful tropical storms battered the Gulf and East Coasts in the worst Atlantic hurricane season in recorded history. Record floods, hurricane-speed windstorms, and severe droughts devastated families and communities across the Midwest. People have lost homes and irreplaceable memories of their loved ones, small businesses built from years of tireless labor and sacrifice, farmland meant to be passed on to the next generation, and so much more.
At the same time, Black, Latino, Indigenous, and other communities of color continue to be hit hardest by the impacts of climate change. They bear the highest burden of pollution, face higher rates of heart and lung disease, are least likely to have safe drinking water in their homes, and suffer increased risk of death from COVID-19. These communities have also frequently been shut out of government decisions that directly bear on their interests. We have an obligation to correct these historic wrongs and to build a future where all people have clean air to breathe, clean water to drink, healthy communities in which they can live, work, and learn, and a meaningful voice in their future.
That is why my Administration is advancing the most ambitious climate agenda in our Nation’s history. Our clean energy plan will create millions of good-paying union jobs, ensure our economic competitiveness, and improve the health and security of communities across America. By making those investments and putting millions of Americans to work, the United States will be able to cut our greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030.
Our success in confronting the climate crisis will not be ours alone. It will be shaped, bolstered, and ultimately won by a united pledge from global leaders to set the world on a path to a clean energy future. Today, on the fifth anniversary of the United States ratifying the Paris Agreement, we have brought nations from across the world together to meet the moment and raise our climate ambitions.
More than 50 years ago, a generation rallied to confront the environmental crises they faced. They took action in hopes that those in power would listen. Today, a new generation is sounding the alarm louder than ever, demanding that world leaders act. It is in all our interests to rise to that challenge and let our legacy be one of action.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 22, 2021, as Earth Day. I encourage all Americans to engage in programs and activities that will promote an understanding of environmental protection, the urgency of climate change, and the need to create a healthier, safer, more equitable future for all people.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-second day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-fifth.
JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.”
Call for clarity on bio-plastics labelling
Responses to a Government consultation have expressed fears that some plastics marketed as ‘biodegradable’ may not biodegrade in real-life conditions and could encourage littering by offering a false reassurance to the public, reports Will Hatchett of MRW.co.uk.
Many respondents also reflected widely expressed concerns that oxo-biodegradable plastics could pollute the environment with microplastics.
Responses to the consultation from Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Defra said current terms are confusing and can be overlapping. Biodegradable plastics are designed to break down into water, biomass, carbon dioxide and methane. Those which are ‘bio-based’ are made from natural plant-based polymers, such as starch or cellulose.
Some of these products are marketed as ‘compostable’, but industrial rather than domestic composting conditions are optimal. Plastics referred to ‘oxo-degradable’ or ‘oxo-biodegradable’, contain added prodegradant chemicals, designed to assist biodegradation.
Responses were generally positive about such products for reducing carbon impact, but there was caution on their potential environmental effects in the oceans and landfill.
There was a clear consensus that, for plastics containing prodegradant agents, the technologies are “unproven” and “likely to be a source of microplastic pollution”.
Biodegradable plastics were felt to have a limited but valid role, mainly when conventional plastic is too contaminated to be reused or recycled.
Respondents noted that manufacturing standards only exist for plastics suitable for industrial composting but not home composting. It was felt that compostable plastics should be encouraged only in specific circumstances.
The Government agreed that the term ‘bio-plastics’ is “ambiguous and offers little value to the public”.
It says labeling should be clear and explain whether products are bio-based and/or biodegradable and how they should be disposed of correctly. It notes: “Such clarity would bring benefits in waste management through helping to ensure different materials are sorted correctly.”
The Government said bio-based plastics, especially those made from organic sources such as food waste, could reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. Compostable plastics also have the potential to ensure less food waste ends up in landfill.
It added: “It is essential that the right evidence is gathered to ensure that the solutions we chose today do not cause greater complications for tomorrow…we would welcome further research on the full environmental impacts of using bio-based plastics.”
The call for evidence was issued to inform implementation of the UK’s waste and resources and bio-economy strategies. Fifty-nine responses were received from the waste industry, campaigners, councils, universities and manufacturers. The Government’s ambition is to double the size of the UK’s bio-economy by 2030.
REA welcomes UK Government Biomass Strategy Call for Evidence
The Association for Renewable Energy and Clean Technology (REA) has welcomed the publication of the UK Government’s Biomass Strategy Call for Evidence.
The call for evidence aims to strengthen the government’s evidence base around biomass and will contribute to a review of the potential for biomass to support the UK’s net-zero goals, reports bioenergy-news.com
“The REA warmly welcomes the publication of the government’s Biomass Strategy Call for Evidence,” said Dr Nina Skorupska CBE, chief executive of the REA.
“Bioenergy is already the largest contributor to renewable energy production across the UK’s heat, power, and transport sectors and the government’s commitment to developing an up-to-date strategy is of great importance to realising the energy transition.
“In 2019, the REA Bioenergy Strategy demonstrated that 16% of primary energy demand could be sustainably met through bioenergy use. As such, this announcement recognises that bioenergy is an essential component for getting to net-zero emissions by 2050.
“As a starting point, the government must consider the range of existing bioenergy skills, supply chains, and technologies already present in the UK across heat, transport, and power.
“Strategically important innovations, like bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, will be delivered by building on the UK’s world-leading biomass sectors and adhering to strict science-led sustainability governance. Such developments require the market to direct how biomass is best used, delivering both immediate and future carbon reductions.
“The REA looks forward to working closely with BEIS throughout the development of the Biomass Strategy, highlighting how the industry will play its part in the successful decarbonisation of the UK energy system.”
Clydesdale Bank invests £6m in biomass heat for UK poultry sector
Clydesdale Bank has announced a £6 million (€7 million) investment to support North Yorkshire’s poultry sector using renewable energy, reports bioenergy-news.com.
The funding, a collaborative effort between the bank’s renewable and agricultural divisions, has allowed biomass boiler company, Biomass Group, to acquire Richard Maxwell Ltd and provide renewable heating to poultry sheds.
Owning and operating 12 MW of biomass boilers, Biomass Group delivers sustainable heat at a level of 24 GWh per year, saving more than 6,000 tonnes of CO2. Biomass boilers are key to ‘greening’ farming operations, as they offer an opportunity to replace fossil fuel heating systems with a sustainable alternative, such as wood chips or wood pellets.
Keith Wilson, head of renewable energy at Virgin Money, which owns Clydesdale Bank, said: “As an entrepreneurial organisation that is committed to net zero, we believe we have an important role to play in supporting businesses seeking to transition to more sustainable forms of energy
“Lending in support of on-site renewable heat generation plays well to our strengths and is rapidly becoming a niche for our team at Virgin Money, with this transaction being our third, in as many years.”
“This acquisition will make a real difference on the ground by providing renewable heat generation to large-scale poultry producers who are aware of the impact of fossil fuels on their climate emissions,” commented Brian Richardson, head of agriculture at Virgin Money.
“This is great for the sector, indicating the direction of travel and what needs to be done to prepare for the future.”
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial – Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy
The UK is the world’s first major economy to present a net zero Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy. This strategy comes at a time when the UK is striving forward with environmental progress, with economic recovery from the COVID-19 global pandemic, and towards a healthy future for generations to come.
The UK was also the first major economy to legislate an ambitious net zero target and we are taking a leading role globally in the fight against climate change. Domestically, this is a pioneering agenda, and this government will continue to seek ambitious targets and collaboration from other countries. We will do this most imminently through the UK’s presidency of COP26, the United Nations’ climate conference held in November 2021. I am committed to ensuring our leadership encourages all countries to pledge to a more viable path for our industries’ futures.
Decarbonising UK industry is a core part of the government’s ambitious plan for the green industrial revolution. Timing is critical and we must continue to propel forwards towards our 2050 net zero target with fervour, innovation, and commitment. We will use the actions set out in this strategy to accelerate the green transformation in industry: aiming high with our ambition, as we expect that emissions need to fall by around two thirds by 2035; and ensuring UK businesses expand into new and growing markets in a low carbon world, while broader competitiveness is protected.
From the UK’s ceramic cluster in the West Midlands, to the Teesside chemical plants in North East England, the UK’s industrial heartlands are vitally important to our economy, contributing £170 billion each year and providing 2.6 million jobs (ONS, Annual Business Survey, 2020). As the UK leads the race to net zero, we will ensure that decarbonisation works for everybody and every region. In line with our policy priorities, we will use our efforts on decarbonisation to transform geographic disparities. Industrial clusters play a monumental role in achieving our goal: we have set ourselves the target of ensuring that there will be at least four low carbon clusters by 2030 and at least one net zero cluster by 2040.
The 2020s will be crucial for us to lay the bedrock for industrial decarbonisation. Over the next decade we will begin the journey of switching away from fossil fuel combustion to low carbon alternatives such as hydrogen and electrification, deploying key technologies such as carbon capture, usage and storage, and supporting industrial sites to maximise their energy and resource efficiency to reduce costs for businesses. In parallel, we will continue to help industry overcome barriers and work with our international partners, both old and new, to kick-start the demand for low carbon industrial products. The work we do in the next decade will be essential to ensure industry can flourish during its transition to net zero, without moving emissions and businesses abroad.
As the movement against climate change grows, the UK will continue to set global precedents towards a fairer, greener society. We are leading the way, and I look forward to working with industry sectors, businesses, and governments from across the world to ensure these challenges are met.
The Rt Hon Anne-Marie Trevelyan MP
Minister of State for Business, Energy and Clean Growth
The UK is a world leader in the fight against climate change. In 2019 we became the first major economy in the world to pass laws to end its contribution to global warming by 2050. Reaching this target will require extensive, systematic change across all sectors, including industry. We must get this change right as the products made by industry are vital to life in the UK, and the sector supports local economies across the country.
This strategy covers the full range of UK industry sectors: metals and minerals, chemicals, food and drink, paper and pulp, ceramics, glass, oil refineries and less energy‑intensive manufacturing[footnote 1]. These businesses account for around one sixth of UK emissions, and transformation of their manufacturing processes is key if we are to meet our emissions targets over the coming decades (BEIS, Final UK greenhouse gas emissions from national statistics: 1990 to 2018: Supplementary tables, 2020).
The aim of this strategy is to show how the UK can have a thriving industrial sector aligned with the net zero target, without pushing emissions and business abroad, and how government will act to support this. An indicative roadmap to net zero for UK industry based on the content in this strategy is set out at the end of this summary. This strategy is part of a series of publications from government, which combined show how the net zero transition will take place across the whole UK economy.
Part 1: Foundations to deliver net zero for industry
Chapter 1: Why we need a strategy and our approach
We want to provide a clear signal to industry, setting out how we expect decarbonisation will happen through the sector, and the role government will take in supporting and enabling this transition. By doing so, we will support industrial development decisions, improve investor confidence, and provide the greater certainty needed to enable industrial businesses to begin the journey to net zero.
This chapter sets out:
- our ambition for decarbonising industry in line with net zero: our expectation is emissions will need to reduce by at least two-thirds by 2035 and by at least 90% by 2050, with 3 MtCO2[footnote 2] captured through Carbon Capture, Usage and Storage (CCUS) and around 20 TWh switching to low carbon fuels by 2030
- our policy principles to drive industrial decarbonisation via addressing barriers, mitigating carbon leakage risks, and playing a key role in the delivery of large infrastructure projects
- our priorities in the 2020s, which focus on aligning existing policy with net zero and putting in place new incentives to fill any policy gaps
- the policy framework that will be used to drive decarbonisation through the 2030s and 2040s, combining incentives to reduce emissions, carbon leakage mitigation, and supporting policy frameworks to address outstanding barriers to decarbonisation
- how we will position ourselves as a climate leader whilst ensuring UK industry retains its competitive advantage, by working with industry to enable decarbonisation utilising a range of policy approaches, and mitigating against the risk of carbon leakage through levers that grow the market for low carbon products and reduce differences in climate policy between trading partners
Chapter 2: Getting investors to choose low carbon
We want to support existing industry to decarbonise, and encourage the growth of new, low carbon sectors in the UK. In the long run we believe that markets will be best placed to determine the most cost-effective pathways to decarbonisation. Throughout the next decade government will need to help overcome the barriers that currently prevent industry from securing investment to start the low carbon transition.
This chapter sets out how we will:
- use carbon pricing as a tool to send a clear market signal, providing certainty over our net zero ambition for industrial sectors
- put in place funding mechanisms to support deployment and use of CCUS and low carbon hydrogen infrastructure
- establish the right policy framework to ensure uptake of fuel switching
- take initial steps to create a market for negative emissions technologies
- establish a targeted approach to mitigating carbon leakage
- work with stakeholders to understand how an EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) could affect the UK
Chapter 3: Getting consumers to choose low carbon
Without a clear demand for low carbon industrial products, industry risk being undercut by cheaper, high carbon alternatives after decarbonising. Government can take action to support low carbon manufacturers by creating demand and developing the market for low carbon industrial products, without significantly impacting end-consumers financially.
This chapter sets out how we will:
- develop proposals to improve data transparency
- develop proposals for new product standards
- develop proposals for product labelling
- use public procurement to drive change
- support businesses to make greener choices
Part 2: Transforming industrial processes
Chapter 4: Adopting low-regret technologies and building infrastructure
The diversity of industry means that decarbonisation of the sector will be achieved through a combination of different technologies and measures. We will use our industrial decarbonisation pathways modelling to focus on low-regret deployment of key technologies such hydrogen and CCUS, which is robust to future uncertainties such as industrial demand, technical challenges and fuel prices.
This chapter sets out how we will:
- support deployment of CCUS on industrial sites in clusters to capture and store around 3 MtCO2 per year by 2030
- support increasing amounts of fuel switching to low carbon hydrogen during the 2020s
- support low-regret fuel switching to electrification in industry during the 2020s
- review the most appropriate use of bioenergy in industry to provide evidence for the Bioenergy Strategy (2022)
- consider the implications of the recommendation of the Climate Change Committee to set targets for ore-based steelmaking to reach near-zero emissions by 2035
- work with industry to understand what is required to make sites retrofit-ready
- work with the cement sector to explore options to decarbonise sites in dispersed locations
- review policies to address specific barriers faced by less energy‑intensive, dispersed industrial sites
- use Project Speed to ensure the land planning regime is fit for building low carbon infrastructure
- improve co-ordination between decarbonisation and environmental policies to meet a common sustainability agenda
Chapter 5: Improving efficiency
Energy and resource efficiency measures, which reduce the level of energy and materials used in producing industrial goods, will be crucial to getting industry to net zero. Improvements in energy and resource efficiency will play a particularly significant role in reducing industrial emissions in the 2020s, leading the way in widespread emissions reductions while infrastructure for the deep decarbonisation options is built up throughout the decade.
This chapter sets out how we will:
- support sites to install energy management systems
- improve heat recovery and reuse across sites, particularly in sites with high operational temperatures
- help less energy‑intensive, dispersed industrial sites improve energy efficiency through the adoption of technologies available in the market with low payback times
- develop a communications plan to make industry aware of the support that is already available to increase energy efficiency
- support increased resource efficiency and material substitution within industry, by driving the transition towards a circular economy model and increasing reuse, repair and remanufacturing
Chapter 6: Accelerating innovation of low carbon technologies
The low carbon technologies that are needed to decarbonise industry are at various stages of development. We need to continue to innovate and develop a broad range of low carbon technologies to put us in the best position to reduce the cost of decarbonisation and maintain the competitiveness of industry throughout the net zero transition.
This chapter sets out how we will:
- support innovation in fuel switching technologies, including low carbon electricity, biomass and hydrogen
- support first-of-a-kind demonstration of carbon capture utilisation and storage from a range of industrial sources
- support the development of industrial digital technologies to maximise efficiency improvements
- support research into advanced technologies
- support advancements in product innovation
Part 3: Maximising the UK’s potential
Chapter 7: Net zero in a global market
Decarbonising industry is a global challenge. Industrial products are bought and sold in every country in the world, and the sector accounts for around 24% of global carbon dioxide emissions (IEA, Tracking Industry 2020, 2018). By leading and advocating for stronger international collaboration with others, we will develop new technologies faster, increase production, and bring down the costs of industrial decarbonisation more quickly.
This chapter sets out how we will:
- work with our partners to create a coalition of countries committed to shared approaches to developing the market for low carbon products
- lead global innovation efforts, through the UK’s leading role in Mission Innovation, to reduce the costs of supplying low carbon industrial products
- support industrial decarbonisation through trade policy
- capitalise on the export opportunities of having a world-leading net zero industry
- continue to work with key international organisations, countries and initiatives to encourage industrial decarbonisation in developing countries
Chapter 8: Levelling up
The manufacturing sector is a crucial part of local economies across the UK, often providing well-paid jobs in areas where salaries fall below the UK average, and it is vital that this sector thrives now and in the future. We will use the opportunity of net zero to transform the UK’s industrial regions, attracting inward investment, future proofing businesses and securing the long-term viability of jobs.
This chapter sets out how we will:
- unlock new job opportunities through deployment of low carbon infrastructure in industrial areas
- support the skills transition so that the current and future workforce benefit from the creation of new jobs
- create incentives for new industrial sectors to base themselves in the UK’s industrial hubs and promote opportunities to attract foreign investment
- work with devolved governments across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to unlock barriers to decarbonisation
Chapter 9: Tracking progress
Industrial decarbonisation is a complex process and it is imperative that we take action now to reach our 2050 goals. In this strategy, we are setting out new ambitions for a thriving low carbon industrial sector, and we need new indicators to measure our progress. For example, we need to track the deployment of new infrastructure that will enable widespread capture and storage of carbon dioxide, as well as monitoring the growth of green jobs in industry.
This chapter sets out how we will:
- take a strategic, effective, proportionate, flexible and responsive approach to track our progress on meeting our strategy goals
- use government’s annual response to the Climate Change Committee’s progress report on decarbonising the UK economy to inform the public on progress in delivering the strategy, and undertake a full review of strategy actions every five years
- use a range of metrics to update on our progress, including UK industry emissions and volume of carbon dioxide captured and stored, and hydrogen used in industry
Part 1: Foundations to deliver net zero for industry
Chapter 1: Why we need a strategy and our approach
The UK was the first major economy in the world to pass laws to end its contribution to global warming with our 2050 net zero target. With the publication of this strategy, we become the first to show how we can have a thriving industrial sector aligned to net zero. We will work in partnership with industry, its workforce, customers and communities, sharing the costs and opportunities of this green industrial revolution.
This strategy builds on the ambition and actions set out in the Industrial Decarbonisation and Energy Efficiency Roadmaps to 2050 project: updating the pathways analysis and adapting actions to reflect our net zero target, considering fully the role of hydrogen and resource efficiency, and expanding to consider all of UK industry.
This strategy reflects advice and feedback from trade associations, businesses, environmental groups, academics and the Climate Change Committee (CCC). Workshops explored themes such as incentives to adopt low carbon technologies, carbon leakage risks and the importance of a clear policy and funding landscape. The role of government, industry and the consumer in the net zero transition were discussed at a Confederation of British Industry roundtable with over 40 industry representatives, as well as the BEIS Industrial Energy and Energy Intensive Industry stakeholder forums. Finally, the pathways analysis in Annex 4 was tested with a group of academic experts. We look forward to continued partnership with our stakeholders, so that we can deliver the ambition of this strategy together over the coming years.
The decarbonisation challenge
Industrial products are vital to life in the UK, from the fabric of our buildings to the materials we use in our daily life. Without manufacturing industry, there would be no cars, no COVID-19 vaccine, no food or the packaging it goes in. UK industries combine high end technology and highly skilled workers with ingenuity to make products that are traded all over the world.
Industry plays an essential role in society, contributing £170 billion to the overall economy. It is a high value area of employment, directly accounting for 9% of the UK’s GDP and providing 2.6 million direct jobs (ONS, Annual Business Survey, 2020) as well as over 5 million jobs across the value chain (UK in a Changing Europe, Manufacturing and Brexit, 2020). These businesses are disproportionately important to regions outside the South East, providing well paid jobs in areas such as the North West, Yorkshire and South Wales.
This strategy covers the full range of UK industry sectors: metals and minerals, chemicals, food and drink, paper and pulp, ceramics, glass, oil refineries and less energy‑intensive manufacturing[footnote 1]. It also covers the new emerging industries, which will be the hallmarks of the net zero transition, including low carbon hydrogen and carbon capture, usage and storage.
Today our sectors are highly emitting, and combined produce 16% (72 Mt CO2e) of UK emissions (BEIS, Final UK greenhouse gas emissions from national statistics: 1990 to 2018: Supplementary tables, 2020)[footnote 3]. Around half of these emissions are concentrated in industrial clusters (BEIS, 2020 – BEIS analysis of the NZIP model, see Annex 4).
Figure 1.1: Breakdown of current UK industry as considered in this strategy[footnote 4]
- Clustered sites – total 37.6 MtCO2e
- Non-iron and steel industry – 25.6 MtCO2e
- Iron and steel – 12.0 MtCO2e
- Dispersed sites – total 33.6 MtCO2e
- Dispersed cement sites – 4.2 MtCO2e
- Energy intensive (excluding cement) – 12.3 MtCO2e
- Less energy intensive – 17.1 MtCO2e
This strategy comes at a time of substantial economic challenge and decreased ability of companies to invest. COVID-19 has resulted in a fall in production output, exports, and turnover growth across many of our industries. In the short term, industry has been able to access a range of cross economy government support, and in the longer term we are pursuing a green response to this crisis, including through the actions detailed in this strategy.
At the same time, there are significant positive changes taking place in the global fight against climate change, which will support industry’s net zero transition. In November 2021, the UK will host the 26th UN Climate Change Conference of Parties (COP26), through which we are committed to reaching a constructive, negotiated outcome that drives forward collective climate action globally in line with the temperature goal of the Paris Agreement. The UK is also implementing and negotiating new free trade agreements following our exit from the EU, growing our decarbonisation export and collaboration opportunities in turn.
Supporting the sectors to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050 will provide new opportunities to level up the economy across all nations and regions of the country. Enabling investment in decarbonised technologies can drive job creation and new inward investment in the UK, and create new markets for our manufacturers.
Decarbonisation also creates challenges for industry. Many essential low carbon[footnote 5] technologies are in earlier stages of development, and not yet deployed regularly at a commercial level. Low carbon manufacturing will also be more expensive for some sectors, leading to an increase in their costs, and therefore risking a reduction in their competitiveness. This creates a risk of “carbon leakage” (Chapter 2), which could impact both our domestic and global climate goals. We need to work with industry to overcome these barriers in the coming decades. Any action taken will need to be consistent with our international obligations, both under the Paris Agreement and wider international trade rules.
To meet net zero, our modelling shows industrial emissions will need to fall by at least 90% by 2050 (Chapter 4), equivalent to taking all the cars off the roads today. Any remaining emissions will need to be offset by separate methods, such as planting trees and capturing carbon from the air. All industrial sectors will need to act to meet this challenge. We need to transform how industry uses energy and makes products, and rethink the way consumers buy industrial products.
Through this strategy, we are aiming to:
- show how the UK can have a thriving industrial sector aligned with the net zero target, without pushing emissions and business abroad
- show how and when government will act to support this, while sharing the costs and risks fairly between industry, its customers and the taxpayer
- start a conversation with industry, its workforce, customers and communities about the future of industry in a net zero world
Every part of the UK has an important role to play in decarbonising industry. There are unique challenges to reaching net zero in each of the devolved nations, and some of the ambition set out within this strategy may require devolved powers to deliver. We look forward to continuing to work collaboratively with the devolved administrations to ensure that industry decarbonises across all nations.
To keep industry on the journey to net zero, and meet our carbon budgets and nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement, we expect that emissions need to fall by around two thirds by 2035, delivering this in a way that capitalises on clean growth opportunities. Annex 4 sets out the modelling and analysis that has informed this. Our current expectation is that to meet this we need:
- four of our major industrial regions linked up to the necessary decarbonisation infrastructure by 2030
- around 3 MtCO2 of industry emissions captured each year by 2030, the same as planting over 500 million trees
- low carbon fuels such as hydrogen, electricity and bioenergy replacing fossil fuels, unless combined with carbon capture. To be on track to deliver net zero, we expect that the minimum, in all future scenarios, is 20 TWh per year of fossil fuel use replaced with low carbon alternatives in 2030
- maximum energy, resource and material efficiency within industry, including the adoption of circular economy measures, particularly through the 2020s
- development of a thriving market for low carbon materials
- established approaches to equip workers and local residents to take advantage of new opportunities of decarbonising industry
- cooperation with other leading nations and support to the developing world to ensure that industrial decarbonisation is happening across the globe
We will revisit these expectations as part of the analysis for the Net Zero Strategy later this year, and as relative costs evolve over time. Additionally, in collaboration with the Steel Council we will consider the implications of the recommendation of the Climate Change Committee to ‘set targets for ore-based steelmaking to reach near-zero emissions by 2035’ and the business environment necessary to support the transition.
Over the long run, we believe carbon markets are best placed to determine the most cost‑effective pathways to decarbonisation. But industry faces a range of well documented barriers to clean growth, and government efforts so far have not provided the framework needed to make decarbonisation viable. We will change the policy landscape to overcome these issues, through actions driven by the following principles:
- government intervention should focus on addressing market failures or barriers to decarbonisation. Intervention should be technology neutral, and fairly share the cost and risk between industry, consumers and taxpayers (Chapter 2 and 3)
- where decarbonisation leads to significant costs that creates carbon leakage risk, it should be supported by targeted intervention to mitigate this risk (Chapter 2)
- government should play a key role in delivery of large infrastructure projects for key technologies (for example CCUS and hydrogen networks) where there is a shared benefit and the risk or cost is too great for the private sector (Chapter 4)
- government should intervene to deliver specific strategic outcomes in line with wider priorities set out in Build Back Better: our plan for growth (Chapters 6 and 8)
These principles inform the commitments in this strategy, and will be the basis for our interventions through the 2020s and beyond. Annex 1 collects the full range of delivery commitments made in this strategy and Annex 3 sets out how we will deliver our goal of achieving four low carbon clusters by 2030 and at least one fully net zero cluster by 2040.
Action in the 2020s
We are entering a crucial decade where we will lay the policy and infrastructure foundations to enable deep decarbonisation and ensure businesses do not lock in high carbon technologies. We also hear the feedback that current policies are complicated and overlapping. Our actions in the 2020s will focus on aligning existing policy with net zero and putting in place new incentives to fill any policy gaps, to create a clear set of incentives that stands the test of time. Through these changes we will create the conditions for the first industrial businesses to deeply decarbonise, forging a path for other companies to follow. At the same time we will continue to incentivise energy efficiency improvements across industry, to ensure emissions targets are met.
For our funding approach, this means having the right schemes in place to support the deployment of low carbon technologies. And it means investing in the critical shared infrastructure required to deploy these technologies.
For our approach to carbon pricing, this means ensuring the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) sets a cap in line with our emissions targets, and that our policy provides the right long-term signals to incentivise abatement across industry. It also means ensuring appropriate mitigations for competitiveness are in place that accurately reflect carbon leakage risks and do not disincentivise abatement.
For regulation, this means introducing new incentives to address other market failures. This includes measures to support the development of the market for low carbon products.
Frameworks for the 2030s and 2040s
In the 2030s and 2040s, deep decarbonisation will set in across industry, building on the concrete steps taken in the 2020s. As decarbonisation becomes more widespread, government’s role will change. Certainty about the impact and cost of technologies will improve, gradually reducing the need for government funding to support deployment. Essential foundations such as building infrastructure and maturation of the low carbon product market will be completed, further reducing the need for government intervention.
Government will continue to play a role in reducing emissions. We see emissions trading and product regulation policies continuing to form the core levers used to drive deployment of low emissions technology through to 2050. Long term, we need to address the competitiveness risks arising from such policies that give rise to carbon leakage. This will include ensuring that both global and local incentives to decarbonise endure by seeking to reduce differences in climate policy between trading partners. For example, by closing differentials in global carbon prices as the cap of the UK ETS tightens and fewer emission allowances are given for free. As set out in the Net Zero Review Interim Report, this could be achieved through a range of policy approaches including climate diplomacy and treating imports in ways that seek to compensate for the competitiveness impacts of any asymmetries between trading partners’ climate policies.
Measures to improve productivity could also be implemented to mitigate competitiveness pressures. These options are discussed in the Net Zero Review Interim Report. Figure 1.3 sets out the framework of policy options that could drive abatement in industry by 2050, building on work undertaken in the 2020s.
Figure 1.3: Possible industrial emissions policy approaches by 2050
1. Primary sector decarbonisation incentive (essential)
Gets existing and new industries to keep emissions low so we can meet net zero
- Carbon pricing
- Product standards
2. Carbon leakage mitigation mechanism (necessary if other countries decarbonise more slowly)
Appropriately addresses risks of carbon leakage as a result of differences in climate policies
- Climate diplomacy
- Improving productivity
- Treatment of imports
3. Wider supporting policy framework (beneficial to support net zero transition)
Enables transition across sector and addresses any final barriers
- Skills transition
- Energy / resource efficiency regulation
- Targeted assistance for innovation and complex sites
Direct government funding for new abatement projects in industry will decrease in the 2030s and into the 2040s as, in line with our principles, we increasingly see the market driving investment in reducing industrial emissions. Government at a national or local level will play a role supporting any necessary training of the workforce as companies evolve in the transition to net zero, to ensure we have the skills needed for a low carbon industrial sector.
Figure 1.4: Strategy interrelation with other relevant UK government publications
|Previous publications that informed the Strategy||Current strategy publications and beyond that inform and were informed by the Strategy||Current strategy publications and beyond that will be informed by the Strategy|
|Overarching strategy||Clean Growth Strategy (BEIS 2017)||Net Zero Srategy (BEIS 2021)
Build Back Better: our plan for growth (HMT 2021)The ten point plan for a green industrial revolution (HMG 2020)Net Zero Review (HMT 2021)
|Future Spending Reviews (HMT)|
|Industrial Decarbonisation Policy||Industry roadmaps (DECC 2015)
Future of UK carbon pricing consultation (BEIS 2019)
CCUS business models consultation (BEIS 2020)
Industrial Energy Transformation Fund consultation (BEIS 2019)
|Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy (HMG 2021)||Call for evidence on market for low carbon industrial products (BEIS)
UK Emissions Trading Scheme reforms (BEIS)
Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy implementation (BEIS)
|Wider System change||Resources and waste strategy for England (Defra 2018)
Hy4Heat (BEIS 2018)
|Transport Decarbonisation Plan Consultation (DfT 2020)
Hydrogen Strategy (BEIS 2021)
National Infrastructure Strategy (HMT 2020)
Construction Playbook (Cabinet Office 2020)
Procurement Green Paper (Cabinet Office 2020)
Energy White Paper (BEIS 2020)
Net Zero Heat & Buildings Strategy (BEIS 2021)
|Future UK Free Trade Agreements (DIT)
Transforming Infrastructure Performance: Roadmap to 2030 (IPA)
National Policy Statement for Energy (BEIS)
Progress so far and next steps
Total industry emissions have more than halved over the past 30 years (BEIS, Final UK greenhouse gas emissions national statistics: 1990 to 2018: Supplementary tables, 2020). Analysis by the CCC suggests this can be explained by a combination of the changing structure of the UK’s manufacturing sector, improved energy efficiency, and a shift to lower-carbon fuels. However, emissions reductions in industry are slowing, and more action is needed if we are going to meet our net zero commitments.
We have a good policy foundation that can help us meet this challenge. Energy‑intensive industry has been covered by a cap-and-trade policy in the UK since 2005. In 2015, we published the Industrial Decarbonisation and Energy Efficiency Roadmaps to 2050, which set out a series of pathways for emissions reductions for energy-intensive sectors. Alongside the 2017 Clean Growth Strategy, we published action plans that identified how government and industry should work together to enable decarbonisation in line with our previous 80% emissions reduction target.
More recently, we have set out to have the world’s first net zero industrial cluster by 2040, launched the new UK Emission Trading Scheme and the Industrial Energy Transformation Fund, consulted on commercial support for carbon capture, and announced a £1 billion Carbon Capture and Storage Infrastructure Fund and a £240 million Net Zero Hydrogen Fund. Annex 2 details the full set of extant UK government policies that support industrial decarbonisation.
Industry is greatly interconnected with the UK’s energy system, and delivering net zero in the sectors will have a wide range of interactions with our wider economy as it too decarbonises. This strategy builds on commitments in previous government strategies and policy consultations, including the 2020 Ten Point Plan or a Green Industrial Revolution (Ten Point Plan). It sits in a wider system of strategies that set out how net zero will be achieved for the UK as a whole.
We are setting our policy framework for the 2020s now, and will implement this over the rest of the decade; driving deep decarbonisation of first movers, energy efficiency improvements across sectors, and setting the incentives to ensure a smooth transition to net zero for all of industry, taking advantage of the innovation opportunities available and retaining competitiveness as we reduce emissions.
This is the start of the journey. We need to stay focused on our overarching net zero 2050 goal, but respond to feedback and evolve how we get there. We will track emissions and other indicators and update on our progress annually. We will build on this strategy, updating our actions every five years. (Chapter 9)
|Phase 1. Establishing and developing policy framework to kick-start industry net zero transition||Phase 2. Developing and finalising our policy framework to support wider industrial decarbonisation||Phase 3. Long-term steady deep decarbonisation ongoing across all industry sectors|
|State of emissions in industry||– First businesses begin deep decarbonisation
– Building of transport and storage networks for CCUS and hydrogen commenced
|– More UK businesses begin deep decarbonisation process, majority developing net zero aligned plans
– Low-carbon industrial clusters begin to come online
|– All UK businesses completed, undertaking or fully planned deep decarbonisation process in line with net zero
– First net-zero industrial clusters begin to come online, businesses outside of clusters access shared hydrogen and CCUS infrastructure
|Business case for decarbonisation||– Business model of capital funding and revenue support contract
– Energy efficiency measures undertaken funded in part by the Industrial Energy Transformation Fund (IETF)
|– Competitively allocated business model contracts, phase-out of upfront funding
– ETS cap tightening with reformed leakage mechanism, and cost of technology reducing
– Implementation of demand-side policies to support consumer decision making
|– ETS cap and/or product standards limit emissions, with leakage mechanism established in Phase 2
– Wider demand-side policies in place to support consumer decision making
|Wider government policy development||– ETS cap and trajectory set to deliver net zero in traded sector – free allocation mitigates against leakage risk
– Other funding streams support technology innovation
– Development of policies to enable fuel switching to hydrogen and electrification
|– IETF and other funding streams supporting additional abatement begin to phase out
– More comprehensive smaller policy interventions remain to mitigate other barriers (e.g. retrofit ready)
|– Policy interventions to support net zero transition across economy (e.g. skills transition support)|
Chapter 2: Getting investors to choose low carbon
Reducing industrial emissions to net zero is a commercial challenge. In many cases, the financial cost of making low carbon industrial products will be higher than the carbon intensive production methods used now. In all cases, the costs associated with decarbonising industry are uncertain and will be influenced by factors such as fuel prices, costs of new equipment and the proximity of industrial sites to shared infrastructure or other industrial users. We want to support existing industry and encourage the growth of new, low carbon sectors in the UK. To achieve this, we need to help make low carbon investments become a viable option for industry, meeting industry’s need for short term pay back on investment. Aligning with the principles set out in the government’s Net Zero Review Interim Report, we need to consider how costs of net zero can be shared fairly between the taxpayer, industry and its customers.
In the long run, markets will be best placed to determine the most cost-effective pathways to decarbonisation. Throughout the next decade, government will need to help overcome a number of different market failures and barriers to entry that prevent industry from securing investment needed to start the low carbon transition. Three levers will be key to any policy framework designed to unlock investment in the technologies we need to decarbonise industry – as set out in Figure 2.1. An ambitious UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) cap will send a clear signal to the market that this government is committed to reaching net zero. While risks associated with low carbon investments remain high, or if the carbon price is low, targeted government funding mechanisms will pull through investment from the private sector for the deployment of technologies. A reformed approach to mitigating carbon leakage, adapting over time to reflect a tighter ETS cap alongside increased deployment of low carbon technologies, will ensure our global and domestic climate goals are met, while supporting the growth of low carbon manufacturing in the UK.
Figure 2.1: A framework to unlock investment in low carbon industry
– An effective carbon pricing mechanism sends a clear market signal
– Funding mechanisms overcome barriers to securing private sector investment
– Policy reform mitigates risk of carbon leakage for specific sectors
Over time, we expect that costs of deploying new technologies for industry will fall. This reflects experience in the offshore wind sector, where the government’s Contracts for Difference scheme for low carbon electricity delivered investment and significant cost reductions, with costs of offshore wind falling by two-thirds in the past five years (HM Government, Ten Point Plan, 2020). Other barriers faced by industry, associated with risk, or coordination, will also be addressed, reducing the need for direct government support.
The policies set out in this chapter will adapt in a way that reflects changes in the market, to ensure that any government support guarantees value for money for the taxpayer, while industry and its customers pay a fair price for their emissions.
To help drive investment in low carbon industry, government will:
Action 2.1: Use carbon pricing as a tool to send a clear market signal, providing certainty over our net zero ambition for industrial sectors
Carbon pricing is a cost-effective and technology-neutral tool for getting industry to take account of its emissions in business decisions. Pricing policies like the Carbon Price Support and EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) have helped drive a switch from coal to gas generation in the power sector, and the UK ETS will be a key part of the framework to reduce emissions from industry.
In January 2021, we established a UK ETS to replace the UK’s participation in the EU ETS. To reflect our ambition on carbon pricing, the cap on allowances – which represents the overall limit of emissions allowed in the system – will be aligned with the UK’s net zero ambition by January 2024. In 2021, we will carry out a review of the UK ETS. This will include consulting on a net zero consistent emissions cap; reviewing the long-term role of free allowances; exploring expanding the scope of the scheme to cover more sectors of the economy and linking with other schemes internationally; and considering the case for a supply adjustment mechanism.
Some industrial businesses, or facilities within an installation, will remain out of scope of the UK ETS at this time. For those businesses, we expect the Climate Change Levy (CCL) and action agreed through the Climate Change Agreements (CCA) scheme to act as a driver for energy efficiency improvements and decarbonisation. The CCA scheme has recently been extended by two years, providing significantly reduced CCL rates until March 2025 for participants who meet their targets. We intend to undertake further assessment of the purpose and targeting of a long-term scheme following the extension, informed by the responses to last year’s consultation.
Action 2.2: Put in place funding mechanisms to support deployment and use of CCUS and low carbon hydrogen infrastructure
CCUS will be crucial to reaching net zero, and low carbon hydrogen has the potential to play a key role in enabling the economic transformation of the UK’s industrial regions. With both technologies at early stages of development, government will need to play an active role in overcoming market failures; sharing the risk and costs of scaling up deployment of both CCUS and low carbon hydrogen.
Throughout the early 2020s, we will support the engineering and technical design elements of decarbonisation projects across the UK’s industrial clusters through UK Research and Innovation’s (UKRI) Industrial Decarbonisation Challenge. Throughout the 2020s and 2030s, further support to develop markets for these technologies will be necessary. We have already committed to a £1 billion CCS Infrastructure Fund to provide industry with certainty required to deploy CCUS at pace and scale, alongside a £240 million Net Zero Hydrogen Fund. Later this year, we will bring forward further details of the revenue mechanism that will support business models for both industrial carbon capture and low carbon hydrogen projects.
Industrial carbon capture
We are already working with industry to develop an industrial carbon capture contract. In December 2020, we set out our ‘minded-to’ position on the commercial business model designed to incentivise deployment of carbon capture technology for industry. For first of a kind projects, we expect the model to cover operational costs, transport and storage fees and a rate of return on capital investment, with an element of capital co-funding for initial projects. The model will be based on the Contract for Difference model with, for initial projects, a pre-defined, fixed trajectory for the reference price, coupled with a bilaterally negotiated strike price that is intended to reflect the actual costs of capture. As carbon capture is established and the low carbon market matures, it is intended that the reference price would evolve to the market-driven carbon price. We plan to finalise the industrial carbon capture business model in 2021 and to implement it in 2022.
Transport and storage
Carbon dioxide transport and storage networks are fundamental to supporting efficient and cost-effective decarbonisation of industry. They also offer a pathway for negative emissions through Bio-Energy CCUS (BECCS) and Direct Air Capture with Carbon Sequestration (DACCS). In our December 2020 update on CCUS business models, we set out plans to publish a carbon dioxide Transport and Storage Regulatory Investment business model. The regulatory framework will support a stable, predictable and indexlinked model which will underpin investment returns so that carbon capture can play a role in the UK’s economy, supported, where needed, by appropriate levels of government intervention (BEIS, CCUS: an update on Business Models, 2020).
Low carbon hydrogen
The government’s Ten Point Plan confirmed that a £240 million Net Zero Hydrogen Fund will provide capital co-investment for early low carbon hydrogen production projects. The December 2020 update on CCUS business models also included an update on our work on hydrogen business models and summarised our approach to developing business models that aim to overcome the cost gap between low carbon hydrogen and higher carbon fuels, such as natural gas. We have committed to a consultation on preferred low carbon hydrogen business models in Q2 2021, with a final model to be agreed in 2022. We have also committed to setting out further details on the revenue mechanism to fund our hydrogen business model later in 2021.
Alongside work on business models, we are considering the role that fuel standards can play in helping industry invest in low carbon alternatives. We are gathering evidence on the emissions associated with different hydrogen production technologies and will work with industry to develop a UK standard that defines low carbon hydrogen. Further details will be provided in the UK Hydrogen Strategy.
Action 2.3: Establish the right policy framework to ensure uptake of fuel switching
While CCUS will be critical to achieving net zero, fossil fuels (gas, coal and oil) will also need to be replaced with low carbon alternatives such as low carbon hydrogen, electricity or biomass (primarily with CCUS). Industry face barriers to fuel switching (set out in detail in Chapter 4) and we acknowledge that there may be a role for government to support uptake of fuel switching, beyond the business models for low carbon hydrogen set out in the previous section. During 2021, we will review the existing policy landscape and assess the impact that barriers have on business decisions about investing in electrification and biomass (primarily with CCUS) technologies. We will also consider how industry can make use of smart technologies, such as storage and demand side response, to provide flexibility to the system, helping industrial consumers use energy when it is cheapest and cleanest.
By the end of 2021, we will set out any initial steps that the government will take to support the uptake of electrification and biomass (primarily with CCUS) for industry.
We recognise that the UK’s industrial electricity costs are currently higher than those of some of our competitors, which partly reflects how the costs of the electricity system are distributed across household and industrial customers. We have taken steps to reduce the cumulative impact of energy and climate change policies on industrial electricity prices for eligible sectors. The total package of compensation and exemptions from electricity policy costs was worth over £470 million in 2019, through compensation for indirect costs of the EU ETS and Carbon Price Support, as well as exemptions for Contracts for Difference, Renewables Obligation and small-scale feed-in-tariffs. The UK’s industrial gas prices are competitive; gas prices for medium industrial users were the fourth lowest in the EU15 in the second half of 2019.
As set out in the Energy White Paper, fairness sits at the heart of our approach to decarbonising the energy system. We want households and businesses to be confident that all energy users are fairly sharing in the benefits and costs of the UK’s transition to net zero. To help make this happen, we will publish a call for evidence by April 2021 and begin a strategic dialogue between government, consumers and industry on affordability and fairness in our energy system.
Action 2.4: Take initial steps to create a market for negative emissions technologies
Our pathways modelling demonstrates that there will be a small amount of residual emissions (about 6 Mt CO2e) that will need to be offset through a combination of different greenhouse gas removal (GGR) measures. GGR technologies include afforestation as well as innovative technologies including DACCS and BECCS.
In June 2020, the government announced up to £100 million of new research and development funding to help develop direct air capture technologies in the UK. This will support the development of GGR technologies to help them achieve commercialisation. In December 2020, we launched a call for evidence on GGRs, to strengthen the government’s evidence base on the viability of different GGRs in the UK and the role of government in addressing market barriers and stimulating the development and deployment of GGRs. We will use responses from this call for evidence to inform the government’s future policy in this area, including considering how the UK ETS could be developed to incentivise deployment of GGRs.
Case study: Chemicals sector decarbonisation
The chemicals sector will be a vital part of the net zero economy. A large proportion of the manufacturing sector uses chemicals to make products such as batteries, wind turbine blades and solar panels, lightweight materials for transport and fuels such as hydrogen. In 2020, the Chemical Industries Association published their report ‘Accelerating Britain’s Net Zero Economy’, setting out how the sector can provide a direct and indirect contribution to reaching net zero. Working closely with government, the chemicals sector can benefit from policy designed to deploy new technologies in industrial clusters across Scotland, Wales and the North of England, as well as the demand‑side mechanisms we discuss in Chapter 3.
Action 2.5: Establish a targeted approach to mitigating carbon leakage
Managing the trade-off between driving change as we seek to meet our domestic and global climate goals and keeping businesses competitive is key to achieving a successful transition to low carbon industry.
As the UK transitions to net zero, there will be implications for the competitiveness of UK businesses. Some businesses will benefit from new export opportunities (Chapter 7), but others could face competitiveness concerns if other countries do not decarbonise as quickly as the UK. These changes could lead to carbon leakage.
Carbon leakage is when policies achieve their goal of lowering emissions in one jurisdiction but drive some companies to move production or reallocate investment to other countries with less ambitious greenhouse gas emissions reduction policies. This could lead to an increase in overall global emissions, and a worse outcome for climate change. The risk of carbon leakage depends on several factors, including each sector’s costs of decarbonising, how many emissions they produce, how much a sector trades internationally, and climate and business environment policies in other countries.
Carbon leakage can arise through several channels. In the context of industrial decarbonisation, we are particularly concerned with:
- domestic producers losing market share to higher carbon imports as a result of higher domestic carbon costs than those faced by international competitors
- diversion of investment from countries with more ambitious carbon constraints to those with less ambitious ones, leading to increased emissions
Leakage is first and foremost an environmental issue, but it is also an obstacle to a fair and level global playing field for businesses. Industry should not wrongly lose their competitiveness because of their exposure to more stringent emissions targets than their global competitors.
Beyond immediate climate policy, there are wider circumstances that affect the competitiveness of UK industry, and can also lead to investment moving abroad. ‘Build Back Better: our plan for growth’ sets out the government’s plans to support growth across the economy through significant investment in infrastructure, skills and innovation, in a way that enables net zero. As cited above, we will publish a call for evidence later this year on affordability and fairness in our energy system. Net zero is a shared commitment across all of government and a consideration of climate change impact will need to be embedded across all future policy making.
Current approaches to mitigating leakage
Historically, the UK’s approach to mitigating carbon leakage risk has been through issuing free allowances under the EU ETS and providing energy-intensive sectors with compensation for increased energy costs. We recognise this approach may overcompensate for the risk of leakage, and as we further develop our policy framework, we want to ensure that carbon leakage policies are better targeted.
Under the UK ETS, a proportion of allowances are also allocated for free, with the initial approach similar to that of the EU ETS (Phase IV). The UK ETS 2021 review will include considering the role that free allowances play in mitigating carbon leakage as we move towards net zero.
Developing an evidence base
Research undertaken for government in 2020 found limited empirical evidence of carbon leakage to date. These results can in part be attributed to historically low carbon prices in many jurisdictions, as well as the proactive use of measures to limit the leakage risk and competitiveness impacts, as described above (BEIS, UK Business Competitiveness and the Role of Carbon Pricing, 2020).
As UK policy becomes more ambitious and world-leading in line with our emissions reduction targets, the risk of leakage may increase, particularly for high emissions intensive and trade exposed sectors. Long term we envisage that as costs of decarbonisation technologies go down, our key global trading partners will also take action to reduce domestic emissions, and through that the risk of UK industry leakage will decrease.
We have developed a framework to assess the competitiveness of UK sectors and the impact of carbon pricing (BEIS, UK Business Competitiveness and the Role of Carbon Pricing, 2020). We will build on and apply this framework to better understand the impact that government policy, including on carbon pricing, compensation schemes and other measures has on the competitiveness of different industrial sectors.
Considering a range of carbon mitigation policies
There are a range of levers available to government to mitigate the risk of carbon leakage. Some policies we are pursuing will provide some leakage mitigation alongside their primary objective, for example funding policies that reduce the cost of decarbonisation, or demand‑side policies that enable greater passthrough of costs to consumers (Chapter 3).
In the immediate future, government’s preferred method for mitigating the risk of carbon leakage will continue to be free allocation of UK ETS emissions allowances, which will be decreasing throughout the 2020s. We are exploring the impacts of a net zero consistent cap trajectory and the most appropriate way to mitigate the risk of carbon leakage and adverse effects on UK industrial competitiveness as part of the review into free allocations. We have opened a call for evidence on how our use of free allocation can better incentivise decarbonisation and mitigate the risk of carbon leakage for energy‑intensive, trade-exposed industries.
The UK will continue to holistically consider the full set of policies, both in existence and in development, as part of our future trade and carbon leakage mitigations policy development. In the longer term, particularly in the 2030s and 2040s, a range of wider measures could be deployed to address leakage risks for industry, primarily falling into the categories of:
- climate diplomacy: continuing work with other countries and multilateral bodies to align our approaches and minimise the differentials that create a leakage risk
- treatment of imports: seeking to mitigate the competitiveness impacts of any asymmetry in domestic and international emissions mitigations policies
- improving productivity: boosting the competitiveness of UK sectors and making them more resilient
We will analyse options and impacts over the next few years, alongside the government’s Net Zero Review, which will build on the analysis of the risks of carbon leakage and competitiveness that could arise from the transition to net zero.
In considering carbon mitigation policies, the UK will also take account of their wider effects on international trade and investment. The UK is committed to promoting free and fair trade and ensuring that its policies are consistent with our international trade obligations, including at the World Trade Organization (WTO) and our international trade agreements.
Action 2.6: Work with stakeholders to understand how an EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism could affect the UK
As part of the EU Green Deal, the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) proposal is expected in June 2021. Little detail has been provided on what the mechanism would look like in practice, although options considered in the consultation included a tax on imports; extension of the EU ETS to non-EU operators; and a new consumption-level tax. The EU plans to discuss carbon leakage with WTO members, including the UK, with a view to agreeing a ministerial statement at the WTO Ministerial in December. We will work with business, academic and government stakeholders in the EU and UK to understand how such a policy would affect UK industry, and are committed to ensuring our businesses do not face any unreasonable barriers to trade, given the UK and EU’s shared high levels of climate ambition.
Chapter 3: Getting consumers to choose low carbon
A key barrier to reaching net zero is fairly distributing the costs of decarbonisation between the taxpayer, industry and consumers of industrial products. Deploying low carbon technologies will likely mean that the resulting low carbon products will be more expensive to manufacture, unless supported by government fiscal interventions such as carbon pricing. Since cheaper, carbon intensive products will continue to be available at least in the short-term, action needs to be taken to support the development of a market for low carbon products. This will complement fiscal action to reduce the risk of carbon leakage set out in Chapter 2.
Analysis suggests the cost increase in consumer products from the switch to using low carbon industrial materials and components will be relatively low (Energy Transitions Commission, Mission Possible, 2018). Government can support low carbon manufacturers by implementing policies that aim to increase overall demand for low carbon products (“demand-side” policies), without significantly impacting the cost to end consumers. There are two key obstacles which can be addressed through new government action:
- first, there is a lack of information about the carbon intensity of industrial products. There may be consumers who are willing to pay more for low carbon products, but are not currently able to identify them. Consumers need a simple way to recognise low carbon products, and a better understanding of how they can use their purchasing power to support the transition to net zero
- second, carbon-intensive products are currently cheaper than low carbon alternatives. In the long-term, demand-side policy can play a key role in making low carbon products competitive, helping the development of the market and mitigating the risk of carbon leakage
By putting measures in place to address these barriers, government can help to develop a market and boost demand for low carbon industrial products. Over time the market for low carbon products can become self-sustaining, becoming a driver of decarbonisation in and of itself.
Design principles for demand-side measures
We want to use demand-side measures to increase industry confidence in the profitability of decarbonisation and to support consumers to make low carbon choices. To be successful, the measures we introduce should:
- support industry to share the cost of decarbonisation with consumers
- create incentives for emissions reductions which are balanced across industry
- apply equally to domestically produced and imported products to ensure a level playing field
- be adaptable according to the needs of different sectors
- be technology-neutral to allow for the possibility of future innovation
- work in harmony with other policies, such as carbon pricing, energy efficiency and business models for low carbon technologies
- be suited to a joint approach between the UK and other countries pursuing similar goals
Scope for demand-side measures
Industrial products cover a huge range of goods, from intermediary products manufactured from raw materials such as steel and cement, through to final consumer products such as vehicles and appliances. Focusing our policies at the right point in this complex chain will be essential to effect the change we want to see. We will focus on two crucial parts of the supply chain:
- intermediary product manufacturer: government will support the decarbonisation of intermediary industrial products, so that the supply chain is gradually supplied with green materials that trickle down to make up greener final products.
- end-product consumer: government will encourage consumers to make informed choices about the environmental impact of products, creating pressure feeding upwards to encourage greener purchases throughout the supply chain.
Defining low carbon products
A shared definition of what is meant by a “low carbon” industrial product is essential for the development of demand-side policies and will help industry know what to aim for when reducing emissions in their manufacturing processes. There has been significant progress on this issue already, and a range of voluntary definitions and standards have been developed by industrial groups and academia, particularly in the construction sector. However, take up of these definitions is generally limited, and there are few examples where they have become standardised across a sector.
For the purposes of this strategy, when we talk about low carbon industrial products, we mean products manufactured producing fewer, or even zero emissions. However, further work will be needed define low carbon products in a way that is measurable and comparable, for the implementation of demand-side measures.
In developing this definition, we will be looking at the embodied emissions of products. But we are also interested in the entire lifecycle of these products and their impact on the environment – whether they are made of recycled material, their recyclability or repairability, and emissions they produce during the in-use phase. Any definition of a low carbon product will need to take these, and other relevant factors, into account.
To help support the development of a market for low carbon industrial products, government will:
Action 3.1: Develop proposals to improve data transparency
To develop the market for low carbon products, we need increased data transparency so that the embodied carbon in industrial products can be accurately determined. This is a complex task; UK businesses already have to meet a range of emissions reporting requirements, most notably through compliance with the UK ETS and Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting, as well as forthcoming regulations government is proposing to require climate-related financial disclosures.
However, current systems were not designed to provide information to calculate the emissions associated with individual products. More or better data may be needed in order to introduce demand-side policies. To understand how this can be achieved with minimal additional burden to industry, we will launch a call for evidence on low carbon industrial products within the next year, which will cover data collection for the development and delivery of demand-side policies.
Based on the results of this call for evidence, we will develop a proposal by 2023 for how any necessary reporting could best be achieved. This system would form the bedrock of the demand-side measures we will introduce later this decade. We are committed to ensuring that this system is streamlined, is user-friendly and places the least possible additional burden on industry.
Action 3.2: Develop proposals for new product standards
Our review of data reporting will inform our understanding of the embodied carbon in industrial products across the market. Our upcoming call for evidence will also consider how we can define low carbon products.
Definitions of low carbon products could be used to develop a voluntary product standards system for key intermediary industrial products. Under this system, manufacturers meeting the standards set by government would receive accreditation certifying their products as lower carbon than the norm in the market. This would enable manufacturers to clearly distinguish their products from high carbon competitors and could provide an opportunity for organisations who have already laid the groundwork on sectoral definitions of low carbon products to gain government endorsement of their work. We will consider the benefits of a voluntary product standards system following the results of the call for evidence, with a view to their potential introduction by 2025.
If a voluntary standards regime is pursued, we will work with industry in the coming years to agree definitions, ensuring standards are tailored to the product and how it is manufactured, without compromising the safety or suitability of materials used in construction and infrastructure.
Beyond voluntary product standards
The use of mandatory standards is one medium-term mechanism which could be used to drive reductions in industrial emissions. Mandatory standards can be used differently to voluntary standards to set an upper limit on the emissions associated with industrial products, as opposed to recognising the best performing manufacturers in the market.
If government chooses to pursue a mandatory standards regime, and potential legal and trade barriers can be overcome, mandatory standards could be introduced in some sectors over the course of the mid to late 2020s. Initially this would be aimed at intermediate industrial products, but the potential for expanding product standards to other stages in the supply chain will be explored. Out to 2050, mandatory product standards could become incrementally more stringent as the definition of a low carbon product narrows, supporting our carbon pricing policy in driving industrial decarbonisation. Further research and analysis, as well as public consultation would be required before this policy could be introduced.
Action 3.3: Develop proposals for product labelling
Low carbon industrial products are often identical to carbon-intensive alternatives; for example, a low carbon glass bottle will perform the same function as a glass bottle produced with high emissions. The ability to assess the embodied emissions of products will provide a new opportunity to give consumers greater detail on the climate impact of their purchases.
We will develop a proposal for a new labelling system for intermediary industrial products reflecting their impact on the environment, which could be implemented in the mid-2020s. In developing this proposal, we will consider whether existing certification systems such as Environmental Product Declarations, could be used or made mandatory. We will also consider which sectors are most suitable to be covered by a labelling system, and how the sectoral scope could broaden over time. This will be subject to further research and analysis on the impact and benefits of such a system, which government will undertake over the next year.
We will also consider expanding existing labelling for consumer products, such as vehicles and appliances, to include an assessment of embodied emissions from the mid-2020s onwards. We will test different methods of doing this, including examining the use of lifecycle assessments. Any label on a final product will need to be easily understood and used by consumers, building on existing labelling approaches such as energy efficiency labels currently required for energy-related products such as fridges and dishwashers. We will also consider ongoing work on resource efficiency labelling, for which powers are being obtained under the Environment Bill.
Case study: Construction materials: Increased circularity and resource efficiency
The construction sector is one of the biggest purchasers of industrial products, using significant quantities of energy‑intensive materials such as steel and concrete to build the buildings and infrastructure of a modern society. A range of initiatives have been developed by the sector to reduce emissions, including the adoption of a standard to manage carbon in infrastructure projects (PAS 2080), as well as new tools aimed at influencing procurement decisions away from lowest cost such as the Construction Leadership Council’s Procurement for Value work. One example of a project using energy and resource efficiency measures is the Thames Tideway Tunnel, which is currently under construction. Through resource efficient design and the use of waste materials in construction, the project is predicted to be completed at reduced cost and with a lower level of embodied carbon. The measures are projected to save 2,000 tonnes of material, equivalent to 31% of the original design, with 1,379 tonnes of CO2e being saved as a result (Business in the Community, Advancing Circular Construction, 2020).
Action 3.4: Use public procurement to drive change
Government spent a total of £292 billion on procurement in 2018/19 (HM Treasury, Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2019, 2019). In 2018/19, government spent at least £81 million on procuring UK-made steel (BEIS, Steel public procurement, 2020). As a significant buyer of industrial products for construction and defence, government can directly increase demand for low carbon products.
Procuring low carbon materials for public projects will likely be more expensive, at least initially, compared to the high carbon alternatives, but should not lead to significant increases in end-product cost. For example, using green steel in the manufacture of a car has been estimated to add less than 0.5% to the final cost of the vehicle, (Rootzén and Johnsson, Paying the full price of steel, 2016) and using deep-decarbonised cement is estimated to increase the cost of a residential building by a maximum of 1% (Rootzén and Johnsson, Managing the costs of CO2 abatement in the cement industry, 2016).
Ahead of COP26, the UK is developing a new initiative under the Clean Energy Ministerial, supported by the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation and several leading countries. This initiative will explore the role of coordinated action on public procurement to create demand for green industrial products. We want to bring together a coalition of willing countries to set out a collective intention to use public procurement to drive the adoption of green practices, underpinned by a common plan and timetable to collaborate and coordinate our actions.
By acting together, countries can increase the demand pull for low carbon products, helping to achieve economies of scale and drive down costs for all, reducing the risk of carbon leakage and allowing a broader market to develop. International collaboration will support our work to deliver our net zero target. Changes in public procurement behaviour offer an important opportunity to accelerate the adoption of low carbon products in the coming decades.
There are existing measures in place to allow us to consider broader environmental and societal impacts within the commercial process in the UK. This includes Social Value, Balanced Scorecard and the Greening Government Commitments. These measures will be strengthened by forthcoming definitions of low carbon products, and the development and implementation of low carbon product standards and labelling (see Actions 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3). This will ensure a systematic approach is taken to achieving net zero by 2050.
Ongoing procurement reform
Government is in the process of reforming public procurement policy to reflect our values and respond to national priorities.
Green Paper on procurement reform
The end of the transition period provides a golden opportunity to reform the UK’s public procurement regulations, to make public procurement simpler and better able to meet the needs of this country, while still complying with our international obligations. Our aim is for bold reforms that improve commercial outcomes, deliver simplification and flexibility, reduce administrative burdens, drive innovation, get small and medium enterprises winning public sector business and provide more transparency. On 15 December 2020, Cabinet Office published a Green Paper consultation on Transforming Public Procurement ahead of bringing forward primary legislation in the summer. The Green Paper includes a number of proposals to enable procurement to better deliver government policy and maximise societal benefits, such as amending the basis on which contracts are awarded from most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) to most advantageous tender (MAT) and retaining the requirement for criteria to be linked to the “subject matter of the contract” but allowing specific exceptions set by government.
National Procurement Policy Statement
The government will publish a National Procurement Policy Statement setting out national priorities of strategic importance in public procurement, including tackling climate change. The government intends to legislate to require all contracting authorities to have regard to these priorities in their procurement and commercial activities.
Action 3.5: Support businesses to make greener choices
Alongside government, the private sector can create demand for low carbon industrial products. We want to ensure that businesses have the knowledge and resources available to make greener choices as low carbon products become more widely available.
We want to help private companies combine their purchasing power by facilitating the formation of voluntary buyers’ alliances. By acting together through buyers alliances, businesses could benefit from economies of scale while supporting demand for low carbon products. We will engage closely with stakeholders to understand how government can bring businesses together to achieve this outcome.
Efforts to create a market for low carbon products can benefit significantly from global collaboration. A joint green procurement approach would increase and consolidate demand for low carbon products, improving investors’ confidence in decarbonisation. Shared definitions of low carbon products and common product standards can simplify processes for industry and make international trade between countries smoother.
The UK intends to be a key player in a coalition of progressive countries leading the way for the rest of the world in seeking a joint approach on creating demand for low carbon products. We will use key upcoming international meetings, including COP26, to seek joint commitments on these issues. More information on our approach is set out in Chapter 7.
Part 2: Transforming industrial processes
Chapter 4: Adopting low-regret technologies and building infrastructure
A net zero target requires a major change in how industry makes goods and consumes energy. This transformation is unprecedented in terms of scale, pace and cost. Based on what we know today, our analysis shows that net zero for industry is likely to mean:
- Overall, we expect that emissions need to fall by about two thirds by 2035 and by at least 90% by 2050, compared to today’s level[footnote 6]. The remaining emissions will need to be offset by GGR technologies
- Efficiency maximised to make best use of energy and materials, including how materials are used, repaired and recycled (Chapter 5)
- Carbon capture usage and storage playing a vital role. We expect that, in all future scenarios, around 3 MtCO2 is the level of capture required in industry by 2030 to be on track to deliver net zero
- Low carbon fuels such electricity, hydrogen and bioenergy replacing fossil fuels, unless combined with carbon capture. To be on track to deliver net zero, we expect that the minimum, in all future scenarios, is 20 TWh per year of fossil fuel use replaced with low carbon alternatives in 2030.
This is our expectation with current information, and we will revisit this as part of the analysis for the Net Zero Strategy later this year and as relative costs evolve over time.
By the mid-2020s, we will already see change on the ground, notably our first two clusters connected to infrastructure for capturing, transporting and storing carbon dioxide, supported by the £1 billion CCUS Infrastructure Fund and our new CCUS business models. In another five years, we aim to have another two clusters connected, as well as low carbon fuels being tested and adopted across many industrial users.
With a challenge of this scale, a successful strategy means being adaptive as we learn more about decarbonisation and the future shape of industry, but not losing sight of our goals. Our future decisions will be guided by these principles:
- align with the UK’s carbon budgets and Paris Agreement commitments, and help us reach our goal of achieving four low carbon clusters by 2030 and at least one fully net zero cluster by 2040
- support adoption of technologies we know we need (“low regret action”) and avoid locking in high carbon production methods
- where there is more than one technology solution, allow industrial sites to choose the best one for them (“technology-neutral”)
- minimise the cost of the transition by building infrastructure in the clusters first, where multiple industrial sites can use it, including the industrial sectors of the future
- reflect industry’s needs in decisions about the whole energy system, especially the gas and electricity grids
Our technology strategy is summarised in Figure 4.1, showing the timing of the technological changes we need to get to net zero. The first part outlines the low regret actions in the 2020s, a critical decade to start deploying low carbon technologies at scale and building the necessary infrastructure to support them. Large scale infrastructure projects have long lead times and require co-ordination across multiple parties, which is why we are planning them today. The second part outlines the strategic choices for government and industry in the 2030s and beyond. We will keep the strategy relevant in light of changes in technologies and industries by reviewing the actions in this document every five years (Chapter 9).
Figure 4.1: Overview of technology strategy for the next 3 decades
- 2020-2025: Development of industrial digital technologies (M)
- 2025-early 2030s: Increased reuse, recycling and substitution of materials within industry (M)
- 2020-2030: All sites adopt EE technologies with low payback times already available in the market
- 2020-2026: Widespread implementation of improved energy management system
- 2026-2030: Smart metering widely adopted in industry
- 2030- 2035: Heat recovery maximised in sites operating with high temperatures (M)
- 2020-2025: Build CCUS network infrastructure in the first two clusters
- 2025-2030: CCUS infrastructure expanded to additional clusters
- 2028-2045: CCUS networks expanded to remaining clusters and beyond dispensing on technical development (M)
- 2020-2030: Demonstration of CO2 capture across a range of industries (M)
- 2020-2030: Testing hydrogen as a fuel for heating in industrial process (M)
- 2025-2035: Widespread fuel switching (chosen technology depends on various factors) across clusters (M)
- 2028-2045: Fuel switching extends to dispersed sites (hydrogen vs electrification depends on system changes such as repurposing the gas grid) (M)
- 2020-2030: Installation of commercially ready electrification options in low temperature applications
- 2020-2030: Development of high temperature electrification technologies (M)
(M) – milestones which require developments in innovation (see Chapter 6)
- CCUS operational in two clusters (Mid-2020s)
- Four low carbon clusters (2030)
- Industrial emissions reduced by two thirds (2035)
- Share of low carbon fuels increases to around half of total industrial energy consumption (2035)
- First net zero cluster (2040)
- 2020s – Low regret actions: the main focus of this strategy
- Later decades – Uncertainty in the mix of technologies in later decades: actions will need to be reviewed in response to innovation, wider system changes and demand changes
The technology strategy is based on the pathways modelling explained in Annex 4 and supplemented with wider evidence, such as the 2050 Industrial Decarbonisation Roadmaps (DECC, Industrial Decarbonisation and Energy Efficiency Roadmaps to 2050, 2015) and the Climate Change Committee’s (CCC) Net Zero Report (CCC, Net Zero:
The UK’s contribution to stopping global warming, 2019). A pathway shows the quantity and timing of emission reductions from different technologies, which depends on expectations about growth, costs and other factors.
Decisions about infrastructure networks for CCUS and low carbon hydrogen will shape the route we take to net zero, including whether low carbon hydrogen or electricity becomes the dominant low carbon fuel. In the 2020s, we need to see progress in both of them to allow those future choices, which are illustrated in Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2A is a scenario where infrastructure networks are extensive throughout the UK. Figure 4.2B is a scenario where infrastructure networks are limited to clusters. Both achieve significant emission reductions that are broadly consistent with net zero but look different beyond 2035. The second scenario allows less decarbonisation through CCUS and switching to low carbon hydrogen, leading to more electrification instead. It also has higher emissions in 2050 overall, as some dispersed sites, such as cement, are unable to decarbonise fully due to lack of access to carbon dioxide transport and storage infrastructure. This means more emissions need to be offset by GGR technologies. The costs, benefits and feasibility of different options will inform future government decisions about the location of infrastructure networks.
The rest of this chapter is focused on actions in the 2020s, split into action in clusters, dispersed sites and the wider system. The characteristics of different sites and their main decarbonisation challenges are summarised in Figure 4.3.
Figure 4.3: Grouping of industrial sites by common decarbonisation challenges (BEIS, 2020)
|Type of site||Segments (current emissions in MtCO2e)||Profile||Challenges|
|Clustered||Non-iron and steel
|– Sector breakdown varies across clusters but refineries and chemicals dominate
– Mostly covered by emissions trading
|– These sites present opportunities for early deployment of infrastructure
– Challenge is to develop hydrogen & CCUS business models which can support deployment beyond first projects
|Clustered||Iron and steel
|– Two sites make up 95% of emissions from iron and steel: Port Talbot in South Wales and Scunthorpe in Humberside
– Covered by emissions trading
|– Decarbonisation options include: (a) hydrogen direct reduced iron coupled with Electric Arc Furnace or (b) CCUS
– Scunthorpe would have access to CCUS infrastructure; however, Port Talbot would likely need shipping of carbon dioxide to utilise CCUS or Hydrogen
|Dispersed||Dispersed cement sites
|– Cement plants located far away from CO2 storage sites e.g. Rugby cement: 150km from Humberside, Hope Cement: 70 to 100km, through the Peak District
– Covered by emissions trading
|– CCUS is the main solution for addressing process emissions. Some sites are located in areas of natural beauty. The location of these cement sites poses cost, distributional and technical challenges|
|Dispersed||Energy intensive (excluding cement)
|– Sites outside of clusters that are energy intensive such as glass, lime and chemicals
– Covered by emissions trading
|– Often far away from clusters, so challenging to pipe carbon dioxide emissions to a T&S network or hydrogen in from clusters. Access to hydrogen could be through a dedicated hydrogen supply network or repurposing the gas grid|
|Dispersed||Less energy intensive
|– Sites outside clusters that are less energy intensive e.g. food and drink, equipment and vehicle manufacture
– Mostly not covered by emissions trading
|– Electricity costs are a barrier given the relative price of electricity vs natural gas. Future decarbonisation options likely to depend on the future of the gas grid|
Clustered sites total 37.6 MtCO2e Dispersed sites total 33.6 MtCO2e
Supporting clusters to lead the way
The UK’s six industrial clusters account for half of industrial emissions (BEIS, 2020 – BEIS analysis of the NZIP model, see Annex 4) and are well-placed for early deployment of low carbon infrastructure, as costs and risks can be shared between multiple industrial sites.
To help drive the deployment of low-regret technologies and development of infrastructure in clusters, we will:
Action 4.1: Support deployment of CCUS on industrial sites in clusters to capture and store around 3 MtCO2 per year by 2030
In our modelling scenarios, the emission reductions from CCUS are around 3 MtCO2 per year in 2030 and between 8 and 14 MtCO2 per year in 2050. Without CCUS, emissions from current industrial processes cannot be reduced to levels consistent with net zero. Although we can learn from international experience, it is critical that we demonstrate CCUS at scale in the UK in the 2020s and develop our own supply chain. We are working with industry to understand how we can build a thriving UK supply chain, drive growth, and seize the commercial opportunities in the UK and abroad.
Alongside the CCUS business models explained in Chapter 2, we are planning where and when infrastructure should be built. We set out a potential approach for doing this in the CCUS Cluster Sequencing Consultation in February 2021, which sets out a potential two-phase process: the first phase would determine which cluster locations would be prioritised; the second phase would allocate CCUS programme support, including the CCS Infrastructure Fund and revenue support, to individual projects within the clusters. This approach will be refined in response to consultation feedback and other options may be considered.
Action 4.2: Support increased fuel switching to low carbon fuels over the 2020s
To be on track to deliver net zero, we expect that the minimum, in all future scenarios, is 20 TWh per year of fossil fuel use replaced with low carbon alternatives in 2030. Hydrogen, electrification and bioenergy all have a role to play and we will take action to support uptake of these low carbon fuels while taking into account the wider sustainability agenda set out in Action 4.8 as follows:
In our modelling scenarios, consumption of hydrogen as a fuel[footnote 7] in 2030 ranges from 10 TWh per year (if uptake is limited to clusters only) to 16 TWh per year (if some potential in dispersed sites is realised). By 2050, the potential for hydrogen fuel switching in clusters alone is around 24 TWh. In a scenario with widespread access to hydrogen across the UK, hydrogen consumption could be as high has 86 TWh by 2050.
The government is committed to developing a low carbon hydrogen economy in the UK. To support this, we have committed to a £240 million Net Zero Hydrogen Fund to kickstart both commercial CCUS-enabled (blue) and electrolytic (green) hydrogen production. We want to work with industry on the design of the scheme and further details will be set out in the coming months. Details of how hydrogen uptake will be driven in industry will be set out in the Hydrogen Strategy to be published in 2021.
It is critical that we demonstrate fuel switching to hydrogen in industrial sites in parallel to ramping up low carbon hydrogen production. In the short term, early, low-regret opportunities for conversion to hydrogen include steam boilers and combined heat and power processes on chemicals, refineries and paper. In the longer term, hydrogen is currently the most promising low carbon option for high temperature direct firing. These high temperature hydrogen technologies are not yet commercially ready and require innovation and testing to bring them to maturity. Chapter 6 sets out how we are supporting innovation to ensure these technologies are ready to be deployed when they are needed.
Our modelling indicates that electrification of industry could reduce emissions by between 5 MtCO2e and 12.3 MtCO2e per annum by 2050. Many low temperature electrification technologies are commercially ready and it is technically possible to electrify up to half of present industrial fuel consumption globally (McKinsey and Company, 2020). As new technologies emerge and renewable electricity prices continue to drop, electrification will become a more attractive option for industry. Smart technologies, such as storage and demand‑side response, can also provide flexibility to the electricity system, helping industrial consumers use energy when it is cheapest and cleanest.
The main barrier to electrification is the large disparity in the price of natural gas and electricity, resulting in high operating costs. As we set out in Chapter 2, we recognise that UK electricity prices are higher than those of competitors. A range of support mechanisms for eligible sectors are already in place and we will continue to engage with industry and consumers to ensure that fairness and affordability sit at the heart of our approach to decarbonising the energy system.
Electricity networks will need to accommodate increased demand from the electrification of industrial processes. We will work with the independent regulator, Ofgem, network companies and local stakeholders, including industrial clusters, on the approach to planning and delivering transmission and distribution network requirements, including strategic network investment.
We are planning to publish a Bioenergy Strategy in 2022. This will review the amount of sustainable biomass available to the UK and how this could be best used across the economy to help achieve our net zero greenhouse gas emissions target by 2050 while also support the delivery of our wider environmental targets. The strategy will also establish the role which Bioenergy with Carbon Capture & Storage (BECCS) can play in reducing carbon emissions across the economy. Current evidence strongly suggests that, given limited sustainable biomass supply, we may need to prioritise the use of biomass where it can be combined with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), resulting in negative emissions. Cement sites are examples of processes where biomass could be combined with CCUS.
The Industrial Energy Transformation Fund (IETF) currently restricts support for biomass as a decarbonisation measure to industrial applications where there are limited commercial alternatives in the near term. Biomass projects are only supported when they involve switching away from fossil fuels used in high temperature applications (greater than 240 degrees Celsius). Biogas to fuel direct combustion or combined heat and power projects are also supported where the site is based off the gas grid, and injection of the fuel into the grid would not be feasible. The scheme design of the IETF is likely to evolve as the needs of industry develop.
Action 4.3: Consider the implications of the recommendation of the Climate Change Committee to set targets for ore-based steelmaking to reach near-zero emissions by 2035
Steel is used in much of the UK’s critical national infrastructure, from rail to submarines, wind turbines to nuclear power stations. The UK’s main primary steel production facilities are Port Talbot in the South Wales cluster and Scunthorpe in the Humber cluster. These two sites alone produced 11 MtCO2e in 2017, 95% of the total emissions from iron and steel sites and around 15% of total industrial emissions (BEIS, 2020 – BEIS analysis of the NZIP model, see Annex 4). Decarbonising these two blast furnace sites and the wider steel sector will be essential to the decarbonisation story of UK industry.
In our modelled pathways, the iron and steel sector is largely decarbonised by 2035 (Annex 4). This year, in collaboration with the Steel Council, we will consider the implications of the recommendation of the Climate Change Committee to “set targets for ore-based steelmaking to reach near-zero emissions by 2035” and the business environment necessary to support the transition.
Coking coal use in steel manufacturing
Coking coal is currently essential for primary steel manufacturing using the basic oxygen furnace route, which produces the highest quality steel and is the dominant technology in Europe. This strategy takes a technology-neutral approach and so does not rule out the use of coking coal in an integrated steel making process together with CCUS as a net zero compliant option going forward. Any mining of the coal itself needs to be net zero compliant in the future. The mining sector needs to plan for this in partnership with government, in line with the principles set out in this strategy.
Preparing the way for dispersed sites
Dispersed sites (those outside the clusters) are highly diverse, including both energy‑intensive processes such as cement production, glass manufacturing and lime, and less energy-intensive processes such as food and drink manufacturing.
Emissions reductions in dispersed sites will be largely driven by energy efficiency in the early 2020s, as discussed in Chapter 5. Low temperature electrification technologies, such as heat pumps, which are already commercially available, could present options for early fuel switching in dispersed sites. Fuel switching in later decades will be influenced by access to infrastructure and wider system changes, such as the possibility of repurposing the gas grid for low carbon hydrogen.
Under the Hydrogen Grid R&D programme, the government is supporting a range of research, development and testing projects designed to help determine the safety, feasibility, costs and benefits of converting the natural gas grid to carry 100% low carbon hydrogen. We will continue to work with key stakeholders to explore the safety case for blending hydrogen into the gas grid for end-users, including industrial consumers. We will aim for an expected policy decision by the mid-2020s on the future of hydrogen for heating, and linkages with the natural gas grid.
The role for CCUS in dispersed sites is less certain. Although it is technically possible that CCUS could be applied to glass manufacturing or even a large food and drink site, this would only be economical if technology costs for CCUS reduced substantially and if there was an extensive carbon dioxide pipeline network. CCUS could be applicable for large, dispersed sites but will again depend on there being viable options for transporting carbon dioxide to the nearest storage site. Some sites are in protected areas, which could limit options.
Because of lack of access to infrastructure, we expect that the deeper decarbonisation potential of these sites will only be realised in the 2030s onwards. At this point, uptake in dispersed sites will need to be rapid. Dispersed sites will benefit from the technology demonstrations and associated lessons in the clusters, but it is still critical that sites are preparing now for the action they will need to take in the future. We will take the following actions to help dispersed sites prepare:
Action 4.4: Work with industry to understand what is required to make sites retrofit-ready
There are limited windows of opportunity for equipment to be replaced with low carbon alternatives between now and 2050. Fuel switching frequently requires a major overhaul of equipment on an industrial site. Shutting down a plant to replace or retrofit equipment is expensive and disruptive. Typically, equipment is only replaced or upgraded at the end of its lifetime. Industrial equipment often has long replacement cycles, with cement kilns lasting 25-40 years, glass furnaces 12-20 years and blast furnaces around 40-60 years.
There is a risk that sites could miss this window if their equipment comes up for replacement before they have access to necessary infrastructure or before supporting policy frameworks are in place. This is true for all sites, but particularly for dispersed sites that might have to wait longer for access to infrastructure than clustered sites. We will work together with industry to better anticipate machinery lifecycles, so that major capital investments are replaced with low carbon alternatives. This may require flexibility regarding decisions to retire assets – for example, potentially retiring higher carbon equipment early.
Where replacement with fossil fuel technology cannot be avoided, we can reduce delays and costs of later replacement by ensuring that upgraded equipment is low carbon “ready” (either for CCUS or hydrogen). We will engage with industry to understand the feasibility of ensuring that replacement equipment is able to be easily retrofitted with CCUS or hydrogen as applicable. The Industrial Energy Transformation Fund will support this transition through the provision of grant funding towards the commercial demonstration of fuel switching technologies. We will also explore the option of making it a mandatory requirement for upgraded equipment to be low-carbon ready later in the 2020s, as recommended by the CCC (CCC, Net Zero: The UK’s contribution to stopping global warming, 2019).
Action 4.5: Work with the cement sector to explore options to decarbonise sites in dispersed locations
Dispersed cement sites pose a unique challenge. Half of emissions from cement production arises from the calcination of limestone, which produces carbon dioxide as a by-product, resulting in so-called “process emissions”. Currently, CCUS is the only viable option for addressing these emissions. In the UK, several cement sites are far away from clusters and some are in or close to areas of natural beauty. This poses a significant challenge and increases costs for deployment of carbon dioxide transportation pipelines. Alternative means of transport of carbon dioxide by rail or road are possible options that we will explore with the cement industry.
As recommended by the Climate Change Committee, we will work with the minerals industry to consider options for dispersed sites, building on the report published in August 2020 (BEIS, CCS deployment at dispersed industrial sites, 2020).
Case study: Cement sector decarbonisation
The concrete and cement sector is a key part of a combined mineral products industry, manufacturing products for the built environment and infrastructure. In 2020, the UK Mineral Products Association published the ‘UK Concrete and Cement Industry Roadmap to Beyond Net Zero’; detailing how the industry will decarbonise all aspects of production, supply and use. The sector is carrying out demonstrations of a ‘zero carbon fuel mix’ for cement kilns in 2021, funded by the BEIS fuel switching programme. Further research, funded by the BEIS Industrial Energy Efficiency Accelerator programme, is enabling the sector to formulate and demonstrate new low carbon multi-component cements for the UK market. Through utilisation of new technologies and improved efficiency of infrastructure as detailed in this chapter, the industry is set to deliver net zero concrete and cement products across all supply chains by 2050.
Action 4.6: Review policies to address specific barriers faced by less energy‑intensive, dispersed industrial sites
Substantial potential for energy efficiency improvements remains for less energy‑intensive industrial sites, particularly those that are geographically dispersed. However, these sites will also have to switch to low carbon technologies such as electrification, hydrogen or bioenergy in the future. There are specific challenges surrounding the uptake of technologies in these sites, including the fact that many of these organisations currently have little direct engagement with decarbonisation policies. In addition, these sites are often far from clusters, causing challenges in relation to infrastructure networks. Therefore, we will review the policy levers needed to achieve net zero across the less energy‑intensive sites.
Industrial decarbonisation in the context of the wider system
Decarbonisation of industry will not take place in isolation. We will ensure the right enabling environment for low carbon infrastructure and technologies, as follows:
Action 4.7: Ensure planning reforms brought forward as part of Project Speed support the delivery of low carbon infrastructure
Project Speed represents a revolution in the government’s approach in delivering infrastructure better, greener and faster. The National Infrastructure Planning Reform Programme, announced in the National Infrastructure Strategy, will refresh how the NSIP regime operates and seek to halve the time it takes for some projects entering the system from September 2023 to be determined. The programme will help to ensure low carbon infrastructure is developed at the required rate for net zero.
Action 4.8: Improve coordination between decarbonisation and environmental policies to meet a common sustainability agenda
In most cases, decarbonisation and environmental objectives are in alignment. For example, air quality is improved as fossil fuels are phased out as documented in the Air Quality Expert Group’s Net Zero Report (HM Government, Impacts of Net Zero Pathways on future air quality in the UK, 2020). In some instances, however, emissions reduction and wider environmental goals can misalign, leading to additional challenges and costs for industry. For example, increased use of biomass could have unintended consequences for broader emissions including air quality. Therefore, it is important that the deployment of new decarbonisation technologies and associated policies consider wider environmental outcomes, such as air quality and water conservation.
Therefore, it is important that we ensure that the deployment of new decarbonisation technologies and associated policies help us achieve our legally binding environmental targets, such as for air quality, water quality and biodiversity as set out in the 25 Year Environment Plan.
Chapter 5: Improving efficiency
Energy and resource efficiency measures, along with materials substitution, reduce the level of energy and materials used in production and keep industrial products and materials in use for longer. This will be crucial in getting industry to net zero. It is estimated that these measures could contribute up to 13 MtCO2e of annual emissions reductions by 2050 (see Annex 4) and reduce the overall cost of decarbonisation by lowering the amount of energy that needs to be converted to cleaner sources and reducing operational costs. Improvements in energy and resource efficiency will play a particularly significant role in reducing industrial emissions in the 2020s, leading the way in widespread emissions reductions whilst infrastructure for deep decarbonisation options is built up throughout the decade. By maximising energy and resource efficiency in the 2020s, the total cost of decarbonisation will be reduced as the level of emissions needing to be abated through expensive deep decarbonisation measures will be lower.
Industry has already made significant progress in this area, with the implementation of efficiency measures contributing to falling emissions in recent years. Government has played a key role in this process with a portfolio of programmes. These programmes include the UK ETS, CCL, CCA scheme and Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme audits, which encourage energy efficiency improvements, and the Resources and Waste Strategy which sets the foundations for minimising material use across the economy. Additionally, businesses who need support to invest to cut their emissions and energy use have access to funds such as the IETF.
Barriers to address
Although current policies have made great strides, there is a need to stimulate further efficiency savings to align with net zero. There is still untapped potential in industry due to many factors, including:
- awareness and capacity: efficiency is not always prioritised within industry and sites find it difficult to implement efficiency measures, due to the risk of disrupting operations and a lack of staff capacity. Consumer awareness regarding resource efficient decisions, such as prolonging the life of products through reuse and repair, also requires improvement
- access to expertise and advice: industry needs access to quality expertise and advice about available technical solutions and support
- access to finance: some efficiency measures have higher payback times than businesses are willing to invest in and businesses face internal investment competition between efficiency measures and other investments
- measurement and data: equipment (meters, sensors), information (for example from suppliers), access to audits and management of energy efficiency can be improved
- incentives to adopt circular solutions: business and consumer habits are not presently set up to encourage product sharing, reuse and other circular economy measures
We need to overcome these barriers and maximise the potential of energy and resource efficiency measures as they are a win-win for reducing costs and emissions and will be key to help industry reach net zero.
Increasing industrial energy efficiency
Improving energy efficiency in industry means maintaining at least the same quality and level of output, while using less energy in the process. By doing this, emissions can be significantly reduced, and the final products of these processes will represent a lower level of emissions per unit of output. Energy efficiency measures have the potential to contribute 4 MtCO2e abatement in industry by 2050 (see Annex 4) with heat recovery, process and equipment upgrades being most relevant for energy-intensive sectors, and further savings possible in less energy intense sectors.
To realise this potential, in addition to the specific actions listed in this chapter, we will also review regulatory options relating to energy efficiency, working with industry to determine which regulations are optimal in improving industry efficiency levels. This review process will focus on raising baseline energy efficiency levels and all suitable options will be assessed on several factors, including emission reduction potential and synergies with existing programmes and mechanisms.
To help improve efficiency within industry, we will:
Action 5.1: Support sites to install energy management systems
Energy management systems can help businesses improve their energy performance and potentially reduce their energy costs, but their uptake so far has been limited. To drive widespread adoption and improvement of these systems, we will encourage sites to adhere to the requirements set by international energy management standards such as ISO 50001, which enables companies to follow a systematic approach to improve their energy performance. By encouraging companies to meet the requirements of these standards, overall energy use in industry can be reduced.
We recognise that the early implementation of energy management systems may be challenging for some companies, particularly SMEs. Because of this, we are supportive of the work that is currently being undertaken to develop a new voluntary ISO standard, ISO 50005, that allows companies with limited resources to take a phased approach in implementing these systems. This can help companies decide in which areas efficiency improvements are required and the pace at which they should be pursued, based on their specific needs and resource availability. The introduction of this new standard will help our aim of encouraging all sites and companies to install these systems as soon as possible. We will also review how government can encourage more widespread collection and utilisation of data to drive improvements in energy efficiency. We recognise that these improved systems will have associated capital and operational costs, and therefore we will consider how government can help support and incentivise these improvements.
Energy Performance Contracts (EPCs) and Energy Service Contracts (ESCs)
The private sector has also developed mechanisms to improve energy efficiency in industry such as EPCs and ESCs. These contracts often involve private energy suppliers entering into an agreement with companies to identify and implement measures which could increase the company’s energy efficiency, with the energy supplier receiving payment for the contract from the resultant energy savings gained.
Action 5.2: Improve heat recovery and reuse across industry, particularly in sites which use high temperature processes
In the UK, the majority (70%) of the UK industrial energy demand is for heat (HM Government, Energy Consumption in the UK, 2020), with around 35% of this demand from steam systems alone. For example, superheated high pressure steam is often produced in boilers and then reduced in pressure within distribution networks for use in different processes. Unfortunately, when this pressure reduction occurs energy is lost (Chowdhury, et al., 2018). More widely, some heating processes such as those in the steel and glass making sectors, can waste up to 50% of the heat used, so there is significant scope to improve the efficiency of these heating processes.
The use of heat recovery technologies can significantly reduce energy consumption, improve the efficiency of manufacturing processes, and reduce waste. Both the Industrial Heat Recovery Support programme (IHRS) and the IETF provide support for industry to invest in new technology to recover and reuse heat (IHRS has closed to new applications but will continue to provide funding until 2022, phase 2 of the IETF will launch this year). These solutions include recycling heat for other thermal uses within the same site, different end users reusing the waste heat (heat networks) or converting the waste heat to electricity. To realise the full potential of these measures, we will support further research and testing related to new heat recovery techniques, having already supported several projects within industry under the IHRS. These projects include research into quantifying waste heat flows within cement sites for the purpose of utilising this heat for electricity generation. We are also considering further options such as targeted audits in specific industrial sites to drive increased use of heat recovery and reuse techniques.
Case study: Ceramics decarbonisation
Ceramics covers a diverse range of products, from bricks, to tableware, to aerospace components and electronic devices. The sector has the potential to support a low carbon, resource-efficient economy, by making highly durable products with low lifetime carbon footprints, or long-life thermal insulation for high temperature processes (e.g. those used in manufacturing) among others. As we set out in this chapter, using materials more efficiently is critical to reducing emissions. To date, the ceramics sector has invested in improving the energy and carbon efficiency of its processes, for example through heat recovery of kiln cooling air, switching from batch to continuous kilns, and making burner improvements. The British Ceramic Confederation identifies use of hydrogen and electrification as potential routes to decarbonising the sector. CCUS is also technically possible for larger sites but will depend on economics and access to infrastructure beyond clusters. Chapter 4 sets out how we are supporting dispersed sites to adopt these deep decarbonisation technologies.
Action 5.3: Help less energy-intensive, dispersed industrial sites improve energy efficiency through the adoption of technologies available in the market with low payback times
Less energy‑intensive and dispersed sites can make significant savings by adopting existing technologies, but they often do not have the resources to invest in them.
Energy efficiency improvement technologies that pay back in less than five years are already available in the market (Chowdhury, et al., 2018), but have not been fully adopted because of many factors, including users having limited information about their potential, a lack of finance to invest in them and long lifetimes of existing equipment. Examples of solutions with short payback times include boiler flue economisers, oxygen trim systems, and water treatment technologies that can increase boiler efficiency and reduce emissions. Key electrification technologies are also already available in the market, such as heat pumps that can reduce energy demand from industrial processes, particularly in low-temperature heat applications. Therefore, we will review how small and dispersed industrial sites can adopt these solutions, with measures being considered including audit programmes, efficiency standards, expert advice and training for SMEs, expanded funding schemes and finance options.
Cost effective technology options: boiler flue economisers
Significant heat losses from steam boilers occur through the flue gas, which accounts for more than 70% of heat loss in some cases. To reduce this loss, flue economisers are a widely accepted technology, which can either be used to retrofit existing boilers that have no form of heat recovery built in (e.g. non-condensing boilers) or as built-in technology to new boilers (e.g. condensing boilers). This technology represents a cost-effective option – for a boiler with an annual spend on gas of around £15,000, an investment of £6,000-£8,000 to retrofit an economiser could see a payback in four to five years. This payback time can be reduced further if replacing a boiler with a new one which already contains economiser technology (Chowdhury, et al., 2018).
Action 5.4: Develop a communications plan to make industry aware of the support that is already available to increase energy efficiency
We realise the energy efficiency policy landscape is complex, with the range of policies being particularly difficult for smaller companies to follow. Because of this, we will develop a communications plan together with industry to champion the wide range of support and regulation that is already in place to improve energy efficiency levels.
As part of this plan, we will consider options to develop resources such as direct advice, training, and best practice to address capacity and expertise gaps and highlight presently available solutions. We will also emphasise solutions related to behaviour change that could be utilised to improve energy efficiency. We will also focus on ensuring that digital solutions reach businesses at scale, providing self-service options as much as possible.
Industrial resource efficiency and material substitution
Action 5.5: Support increased resource efficiency and material substitution within industry, by driving the transition towards a circular economy model and increasing reuse, repair and remanufacturing
In addition to improving energy efficiency within industry, using the raw materials we rely on more efficiently is critical in reducing emissions. Increasing resource and material efficiency in practice means keeping products and materials in circulation for longer through circular economy approaches such as reuse, repair, recycling and reducing the quantity of materials used within manufacturing. This transformative approach, tackling both consumption and production related efficiency, reduces emissions at all stages of a product’s lifetime.
Resource efficiency and material substitution measures have significant potential, these measures could save 9 MtCO2e per annum in industry within the UK by 2050 (see Annex 4), including a reduction in emissions of 3MtCO2e relating to UK consumption. In particular, individual measures with the most potential in reducing emissions are using more construction materials with low embodied carbon (such as timber), reusing construction materials and using electronics and vehicles for longer. Aside from improved resource efficiency in materials, improved water efficiency has significant potential in realising additional energy and emissions savings in industry. Measures such as improved water reuse and recycling and filtering technologies that improve equipment performance are key options that could further reduce industrial emissions.
Aside from this emissions reduction potential, improving resource and material efficiency within industry can have widespread environmental benefits, for example reducing the demand on natural resources. From an economic perspective, by increasing material and resource efficiency, the productivity of the economy can be increased, making the UK more competitive and improving our resource security. Rather than leading to a loss of economic activity, this shift towards ‘recommerce’, remanufacture and repair activity can enhance our economy in terms of jobs and growth.
Because of these benefits, driving improvements in resource efficiency is a key priority. Our approach in driving the UK’s transition to a more resource efficient economy is set out for England in the Resources and Waste Strategy, which outlines how we will maximise the value of our resources and minimise waste to increase the circularity of our economy. Key components of our policy approach include: improving product designs to ensure durability, repairability and recyclability with the use of selective product bans to drive this improvement; advancing the design of buildings and infrastructure; implementing systems that support recycling including producer responsibility schemes and consistent collection systems; and wider utilisation of data to increase the reuse of secondary materials. As part of this, our modified Waste Prevention Programme will be launched for consultation in 2021, which aims to emphasise the importance of these measures and ensure they are a priority in reducing emissions.
Our wider approach to protecting the environment is set out in the Environment Bill. An important aspect of the Bill is the power to set long-term, legally binding environmental targets. The Bill establishes a duty on Defra’s Secretary of State to set long-term targets in each of the following priority areas: air quality, biodiversity, water, and resource efficiency and waste reduction by October 2022. This includes a proposed target to increase resource productivity, building on the goal of doubling resource productivity across the economy by 2050, as committed to in the 25 year Environment Plan.
The Resources and Waste Strategy emphasises that a collaborative, cross government effort is required. As part of this effort, we are supporting a new £30 million UKRI Circular Economy Research Programme that takes an inter-disciplinary approach in developing solutions that will help industry to innovate and develop best practice. Beyond these measures, we will support the uptake of smarter designs in industrial goods, to reduce demand for raw materials within industrial production. This will be achieved through encouraging collaboration between professionals in each stage of the production process, including designers, digital experts and engineers. By doing this, we will be building on existing initiatives such as the industry-led “Made Smarter initiative”.
Industrial symbiosis involves using the secondary materials from a given industrial process as inputs in a different industrial process. The UK already has considerable experience in this area, with the National Industrial Symbiosis Programme having operated between 2005 and 2013, however, there is significant scope to continue these efforts. Studies have shown the primary barriers to increased use of secondary materials by industry include a lack of knowledge, resourcing constraints, and access to data on potential symbiosis opportunities. We will determine how industrial symbiosis can be further supported to address these barriers and reduce industrial emissions arising from waste. Early-stage research on how a facilitated industrial symbiosis network could operate in the UK has already been commissioned.
We will also support the implementation of the vision of the Energy Data Taskforce through the Modernising Energy Data Programme, by working collaboratively with industry and other parts of government and the public sector to connect energy, waste and water flows from industrial sites across the country and encourage the elimination of waste and the reuse of materials. Finally, government will support resource efficiency improvements through its commitments to creating demand for low carbon products, using measures such as public procurement and product standards (Chapter 3).
Case study: Paper decarbonisation
The UK’s paper-based industry has long set a leading example of embedding efficiency principles into the manufacturing process. Recycling is integral to the sector, with around three quarters of paper made in the UK being produced from recycled fibres. The sector has seen important improvements in carbon intensity in recent decades, driven by fuel switching (from coal and oil to lower carbon fuels), use of high-efficiency CHP and investment in energy efficiency measures. The sector will need to work with government on development and delivery of policies to deliver this transition in energy use. Alongside continued resource and energy efficiency improvements, additional investment in technology innovation will be required to support the development of solutions that will enable the switch away from natural gas to zero carbon fuels.
Chapter 6: Accelerating innovation of low carbon technologies
The low carbon technologies that are needed to decarbonise industry are at various stages of development and investment is required to advance them. The private sector will play a significant role in this, but the uncertainties associated with novel technologies can be a barrier that government needs to help overcome. Many critical technologies such as CCUS from cement production, high temperature electrification and direct combustion firing[footnote 8] are still in the early stages of development. We need these technologies to be ready for large-scale deployment from the 2030s.
Although we cannot predict the exact mix of technologies that will get industry to net zero, we know we need to continue to innovate and develop a broad range of low carbon technologies. This will put us in the best position to reduce the cost of decarbonisation and maintain the competitiveness of industry. This chapter sets out our innovation priorities for industry and the actions we will take to achieve them.
As the HM Treasury 2020 Net Zero Review Interim Report sets out, accelerating innovation requires researching, testing and demonstrating technologies across different uses and stages. This process is often complex and lengthy; therefore industry, government and research institutions need to work in partnership if we are to innovate at the scale and speed that we need.
Our £1 billion Net Zero Innovation Portfolio shows that we recognise the importance of innovation in advancing net zero and will be complemented by up to £3.5 billion of funding from institutions such as industry and academia. For industry, this will build on the success of over £310 million of funding since 2016 (Figure 6.1), which has advanced key technologies including industrial CCUS and low carbon hydrogen production.
We will ensure funding for industry from the Net Zero Innovation Portfolio aligns with our innovation priorities, targeting the development of low carbon technologies where it will have the largest impact. In the near term, the Net Zero Innovation Portfolio will continue to build on the UK’s leadership role and existing projects in the deployment of CCUS, hydrogen and nuclear advanced modular reactor technologies, with dedicated workstreams furthering production, supply and use, feasibility and safety.
We will also draw on our world-class universities and research institutions, including through our £20 million funding that is being used to establish the Industrial Decarbonisation Research and Innovation Centre. Industry can also innovate using new tools we have funded such as the Met Office’s UK Climate Projections to anticipate and adapt to the effects of climate change. That may mean taking advantage of the UK’s cutting edge climate science capability to target measures to protect assets, operations and supply chains from climate impacts, now and in the future.
The partnership for innovation extends beyond our borders. By thinking globally, we can co-develop solutions, reduce risks and bring down costs faster. We can also take advantage of export opportunities for low carbon technologies developed in the UK. This is discussed further in Chapter 7.
Funding programmes related to industrial innovation
|Energy innovation programme||Amount|
|Industrial fuel switching competition||£20 million|
|Industrial Energy Efficiency Accelerator||£12 million|
|Carbon Capture and Utilisation Demonstration (CCUD) (FEED)||£5 million|
|CCUS Innovation Programme||£24 million|
|Accelerating Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Technologies (ACT)||£4.4 million|
|Low Carbon Hydrogen Supply Competition||£33 million|
|Other industry funding||Amount|
|Manufacturing Made Smarter Challenge||£147 million|
|Transforming Foundation Industries||£66 million|
The main near-term industrial decarbonisation innovation priorities can be broadly grouped into five areas: fuel switching, CCUS for industry, energy efficiency improvements (including digitalisation), advanced technologies and product innovation. Our plan is to take action in each of these areas. We also recognise that the innovation landscape is not static, so we will continue to review our priorities over time as new evidence arises.
To help accelerate innovation of low carbon technologies across industry, government will:
Action 6.1: Support innovation in fuel switching technologies, including low carbon electricity, hydrogen and biomass
Fossil fuels (coal, gas and oil) made up around 55% of industrial energy consumption in 2019, most of which was used to generate heat (HM Government, National Statistics: Energy consumption in the UK, 2020). This heat is used either directly, such as in a kiln where fuels are burned together with the material they are heating, or indirectly, such as in boilers that generate steam which is then used for heating elsewhere in the process. We need to support innovation in a wide range of fuels that are applicable to all types of industrial processes to reach net zero.
The Industrial Fuel Switching Competition (IFSC) which ran from 2019 to 2021, has been highly successful in progressing the development of new fuel switching technologies across a range of sectors, including cement, refineries, glass and lime. The latest round of funding was awarded in autumn 2020, with four projects moving from feasibility studies to demonstration. One example is the Glass Futures project in Merseyside, which includes a biodiesel trial on a full-scale commercial line, a hydrogen demonstration on a large lab scale and the provision of evidence to scale up electric melting technology.
The low carbon fuels supported in the IFSC to date were determined by the suitable projects brought forward by industry, with bioenergy and hydrogen projects featuring strongly. There is a gap developing in innovation around electrification, particularly for high temperature processes. As announced in the Ten Point Plan, the IFSC will continue as part of the Net Zero Innovation Portfolio. Going forward, we will work with industry to proactively accelerate the potential of fuel switching technologies, seeking out potential electrification projects and ensure we are progressing this technology alongside hydrogen and biomass fuel switching. As part of this process, we will promote innovation in new technologies that do not lead to conflicts with wider environmental goals, such as improving air and water quality.
Case study: Decarbonising the refining sector
The refining industry plays a pivotal role in the UK economy, providing a secure supply of energy for road and rail transport, aviation, commercial heating, feedstocks for the petrochemicals sector and other uses. Through the transformation of manufacturing processes and introduction of renewable and waste-derived feedstocks (as detailed in the UK Petroleum Industry Association’s 2020 Transition, Transformation and Innovation Report), the industry is well placed to decarbonise its own activities and products and to support other sectors in decarbonising operations, while developing new energy technologies such as hydrogen supply, energy storage and CCUS. Innovation in the industry can be seen in the development of hydrogen firing of furnaces and boilers and also in development of synthetic graphite for the manufacture of high-performance lithium-ion electric vehicle batteries. With the Phillips 66 Humber refinery being one of the world’s leading production facilities for graphite coke, there is significant potential for the UK to lead innovation in this area.
Action 6.2: Support first-of-a-kind demonstration of CCUS from a range of industrial sources
Recent government support for CCUS innovation has moved this technology forward: the £22 million CCUS Innovation Programme supported vital engineering studies, through advancing successful projects across the industrial clusters.
Despite this progress, we need to go further and faster. It is critical that the UK acts now to demonstrate CCUS from a wide range of industrial sources. The Net Zero Innovation Portfolio will include support for innovation in CCUS.
This is a key priority, as carbon dioxide capture from industrial sources can be expensive and technically challenging, and consequently the maturity of CCUS technology varies across different applications. CCUS applied to industrial sources such as steel and cement is still in the demonstration or prototype stage (IEA, CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions, 2020) and therefore requires greater support for innovation in the near term. Many industrial CCUS technologies require bespoke solutions, tailored to the specific conditions on site. Some of the challenges include heat integration of the capture process with the wider site and impurities in the flue gases. Advanced capture technologies such as calcium looping or membrane separation offer potential for addressing these challenges and reducing overall costs.
We will also further explore the opportunities for carbon utilisation. We are already supporting CCUS innovation through the £5 million Carbon Capture and Utilisation Demonstration Innovation Programme. There are still uncertainties around the extent to which some carbon utilisation technologies reduce and permanently store carbon dioxide but it may be appropriate in certain applications. We want to engage with industry to understand lifecycle emissions, consider what future innovation support might be required, and ensure that there is a stable and efficient regulatory framework that supports the development of carbon utilisation.
Action 6.3: Support the development of industrial digital technologies to maximise efficiency improvements
Chapter 5 highlights the significant potential that exists to reduce emissions through efficiency improvements. While many energy efficiency technologies are commercially available today, there is still scope for innovation to maximise efficiency potential. Digitalisation technologies are key to achieving this. Work undertaken for the Made Smarter Review (Maier, Made Smarter Review, 2017) found that the adoption of digitalisation technologies could reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 4.5% while increasing manufacturing growth between 1.5% and 3% a year.
We are already supporting the wider utilisation of digital technologies in industry. For example, funding from the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund has been made available for competitions to drive digital innovation in UK manufacturing supply chains. These competitions were set up to support both feasibility studies and industrial research projects which focus on supply chain integration and optimisation. Examples of such projects include improving track and trace capabilities to help businesses optimise their supply chains and eliminate waste, reducing emissions.
Although significant progress has already been made, we must support further growth in digitalisation. As stated in the Ten Point Plan, developing disruptive technologies such as artificial intelligence for energy is a key priority, and in order to achieve the maximum possible level of emissions reductions, we will support developments in several key areas. These areas could include technologies such as 3D printing and digital twin technology.
3D printing: Producing parts and products through 3D printing can not only lead to lighter and stronger parts, but also reduce lead times and extend product life cycles – furthering the move towards a more circular economy. Being a world leader in 3D printing, in the UK there are several industrial sites that have already implemented the technology, notably in high value manufacturing sectors such as the aerospace and automotive sectors.
Digital twin technology: Digital twins are virtual simulations of real-world systems, which can contribute to improving the sustainability of a system. Smart components can be deployed within an industrial process which gather data, with this data then being connected to a cloud-based storage system to create a digital twin. This digital twin can then be used to identify potential issues within the system and address them before they occur. One example of this technology being implemented is a project run by the Materials Processing Institute which looks at implementing digital twin technology in UK steel plants to improve the cost-effectiveness, efficiency and flexibility of the production process.
Action 6.4: Support research into advanced technologies
Decarbonisation of existing industrial processes is limited by the chemistry and thermodynamics of the incumbent technology. Sometimes a new manufacturing process is needed to provide a step-change in emissions reductions. Steelmaking has seen such advancements over the centuries. The basic oxygen furnace invented in the 1950s, is almost twice as efficient as the open-hearth furnace which came before. Today, less than 1% of global steel production is from the outdated open-hearth technology (Worldsteel, Steel Statistical Yearbook, 2020). Going forward, novel processes such as electrolysis of iron ore may provide the solution to truly “green steel” (Cavaliere, Electrolysis of Iron Ores, 2019).
Continued innovation of decarbonisation technologies such as CCUS could present new opportunities. For example, Cambridge Carbon Capture’s patented CO2LOC technology enables industry to sequester its carbon dioxide emissions at a profit through a two‑stage mineralisation process. The flexibility of this process means it is suited to storing carbon dioxide emissions from a range of industrial sectors and is also a feasible option for small and medium-scale industrial applications. This combination of flexibility, cost-effectiveness and the creation of valuable by-products from the process, which include silicon dioxide and numerous trace metals, means this innovative technology has significant potential.
We will continue to support cutting edge innovation in novel and advanced technologies that could support a transformation to low carbon processes.
Nuclear process heat
While large-scale nuclear reactors are typically used for electricity generation, there are global examples of nuclear use in many industrial processes including: chemical processing, paper production, desalination, steam supplies as well as wider applications such as district heating. More recently, designers of new small and advanced modular reactors are focusing on systems with smaller power outputs which could offer flexible power generation and storage, as well as further potential applications ‘beyond the grid’, such as industrial process heat, low carbon hydrogen production and synthetic fuel production. This potential to produce high temperature heat can be used as an alternative to fossil fuels in industrial processes. The Ten Point Plan announced up to £385 million for an Advanced Nuclear Fund to invest further in these technologies including:
- Small modular reactors (SMRs): we aim to have the first SMRs commercially deployed in the early 2030s, with up to £215 million investment to develop a domestic SMR design
- Advanced modular reactors (AMRs): We are investing up to £170 million in an ambitious programme of R&D with the aim of an operational AMR demonstrator in the early 2030s. Some designs have the potential to produce high-quality, high-temperature heat up to 950°C which could significantly extend the opportunity for industrial heat use
Action 6.5: Support advancements in product innovation
Product innovation involves redesigning existing goods to be more sustainable as well as designing and producing entirely new goods that have sustainability in mind from the outset. Examples of product innovations which have significant potential include:
Alternative cements: by sourcing low carbon material inputs such as pre-calcined raw materials and developing lower clinker cements and concretes, alternative binders and cement formulations, embodied emissions within the cement that is manufactured can be reduced.
Remanufacturing: a series of manufacturing steps acting on an end-of-life part or product in order to return it to like-new or better performance, with warranty to match. Remanufacturing not only preserves valuable raw materials, but also uses less energy. The energy required to remanufacture a product can be up to 90% less than to manufacture from raw materials.
We will work with industry and academia to identify and support key innovations in the design of industrial products that can significantly reduce emissions.
Chapter 7: Net zero in a global market
Decarbonising industry is a global challenge. Industrial products are bought and sold in every country in the world, making up a significant proportion of international trade, and the sector accounts for 24% of global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions (IEA, Tracking Industry 2020, 2018). By leading and advocating for stronger international collaboration with others, we can develop new technologies faster, increase production of low carbon products, and bring down the overall costs of industrial decarbonisation. Driving decarbonisation internationally can further protect our domestic industries from the risk of carbon leakage, complementing our domestic measures discussed in Chapter 2.
Our vision is that over the next few decades, the UK will be a global leader in industrial decarbonisation and manufacturing of low carbon industrial products. We will use the full range of levers available to government to achieve this, strengthening international ties both bilaterally and multilaterally, and supporting industrial decarbonisation efforts across the globe.
The UK is already a leader in the fight against climate change, and we look forward to hosting the COP26 UN Climate Conference, which will take place between 1st – 12th November 2021 in Glasgow. Using our presidency of COP26 and the G7, and wider diplomatic efforts, we are working to establish greater coordinated climate action across sectors.
To help develop long-term partnerships for COP26 and beyond, government will:
Action 7.1: Work with our partners to create a coalition of countries committed to shared approaches to developing the market for low carbon products
In Chapter 3 of the strategy, we set out how the UK will develop proposals to grow demand for low carbon industrial products. Global alignment on these approaches can be mutually beneficial; providing a stronger market signal to drive decarbonisation in industry. Joint commitments and global coordination to procure low carbon industrial products can catalyse demand and increase the incentive for companies to move onto a low carbon pathway. Combining this with shared standards for products could enable the market to flourish, as well as simplify the policy landscape for businesses operating in multiple markets.
We will be pursuing opportunities through the G7, G20, Office for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to create coordinated and scaled-up action. We want to work with our international partners to share approaches to developing the market for low carbon products and take advantage of these benefits.
To do this, the UK is leading efforts to stimulate joint commitments in these areas through the Leadership Group for Industry Transition (LeadIT), which was established at the United Nations Climate Action Summit in 2019. This group aims to foster public-private collaboration supported by technical expertise sharing to accelerate the decarbonisation of industry. The UK is also developing a new initiative under the Clean Energy Ministerial, supported by the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation and several leading countries, which we want to focus on using collective public procurement action to enhance the demand for green industrial products, such as steel and cement.
Alongside this, we will work in partnership with industry-led organisations, including the Mission Possible Partnership, and SteelZero of the Climate Group, who are seeking to establish green buyers alliances for low carbon industrial products. Further development of these initiatives will progress in the build up to COP26 and beyond.
Action 7.2: Lead global innovation efforts, through the UK’s leading role in Mission Innovation, to reduce the costs of supplying low carbon industrial products
Innovation can benefit from coordination across countries, to avoid duplication of effort and maximise positive outcomes. Mutual knowledge exchange on global innovation efforts can support reaching economies of scale for the design and deployment of clean industrial technologies, reducing risk and overall costs for industry and taxpayers. This can also be a tool to engage countries in wider concerns for industry, including overcapacity, as within the steel sector, and barriers to collaboration, like how intellectual property regulations can prevent joint working.
Mission Innovation (MI) is a global initiative working to accelerate clean energy innovation. Since launching at COP21 in 2015, MI has driven increased clean energy innovation investments and strengthened collaboration between countries, accelerating the ‘push’ of new technologies through research development and demonstration (RD&D). Over the past five years, MI members have delivered $4.9 billion increase in annual investment in clean energy innovation; and over 1,000 innovations globally (Mission Innovation, 2020). The UK has exceeded the commitment we made to double our own clean energy innovation spend over the same period.
Innovation is a priority for the UK’s COP26 presidency, and we are actively leading the development of the next phase. Mission 2.0 will shift to a mission-orientated approach, setting ambitious goals for the technologies and sectors where international RD&D efforts will yield substantial benefits.
The UK will look to develop missions with other leading economies that will work towards bold targets and support the UK’s goals for industrial decarbonisation. We will seek to ensure new missions launched at the 6th MI Ministerial and COP26 accelerate the development of affordable, accessible solutions for transition pathways essential to achieve net zero in industrial sectors, such as clean hydrogen, electrification and clean industrial processes. In addition to the fora described under Actions 1 and 2, we are considering how best to advance the UK’s climate change objectives at the World Trade Organisation, with organisations like the OECD and World Economic Forum, and as part of the UK’s upcoming G7 presidency.
To help develop UK and global partnerships, government will:
Action 7.3: Support industrial decarbonisation through trade policy
The UK is starting out on a new and exciting chapter in our global trading history. We are now free to enter into our own trade agreements with third countries, and we are eager to develop new relationships across the world. The UK’s trade policy, including through our new Free trade agreements (FTAs) and independent membership of the WTO, can support industrial decarbonisation by:
- maintaining both parties’ right to regulate in pursuit of decarbonisation and reaffirming our respective commitments to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Paris Agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
- improving market access for low carbon technologies, services and systems by tackling both tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade, for example agreeing a common framework for the certification of low carbon industrial products
- supporting greater collaboration on decarbonisation, such as exploring opportunities for practical cooperation on carbon pricing, including through possible linking of emissions trading systems, and committing to increased joint information exchanges and cooperative working in international forums
- addressing unfair industrial subsidies, which distort markets and prevent long term, low carbon investments
Potential implications of future trade agreements
We have successfully agreed an ambitious trade deal with the EU, our biggest trading partner. The Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) is unprecedented in the crucial importance and prominence it attaches to tackling climate change. It elevates both the UK and EU’s commitment to the fight against climate change and respect for the Paris Agreement, making it an ‘essential element’ of the agreement. It also demonstrates our continued commitment to carbon pricing as an effective tool to help fulfil our climate change objectives. The deal protects both parties’ right to regulate, to set our own policies and priorities to meet our ambitious climate goals.
We have also concluded an FTA with Japan and are currently negotiating ambitious bilateral trade deals with other countries, including New Zealand, Australia, and the United States. In current and future FTAs, we want to emphasise the importance of core climate provisions, and to reduce technical barriers to trade, including of low carbon industrial products.
Through our FTAs, the UK and its trade partners can affirm commitments to implement, and cooperate to address global issues through multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), including the Paris Agreement.
Trade agreements also change industry’s exposure to international competition, and have the potential to impact the environment by changing patterns of production for the goods and services that are traded. We will ensure these considerations are properly understood and factored into UK trade and decarbonisation policy, particularly around the risk of carbon leakage, as discussed in Chapter 2.
Action 7.4: Capitalise on the export opportunities of having a world-leading net zero industry
The race to net zero is on: we need to capitalise on our strengths and remain at the forefront of emerging innovative technologies and industries in the years ahead. In doing so, we will position the UK to springboard into expanding its low carbon technologies export markets and maximising the ‘first mover’ advantage to provide knowledge and technologies to emerging markets.
As countries continue to increase their ambition to meet the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement, there will be expanding export opportunities for the products and services needed in a low carbon economy. It is estimated that global trade in a selection of low carbon products and services could increase from around £0.5 trillion in 2015 to £1.1–£1.6 trillion in 2030, and to £2.8–£4.5 trillion in 2050 (CCC, UK business opportunities of moving to a low carbon economy, 2017).
If global industry emissions are reduced by just 70% in 2050 relative to 2012 levels, exports of related decarbonisation technologies can offer approximately £1.4 billion in GVA per annum to the economy (Vivid Economics, Energy Innovation Needs Assessment: Industry, 2019). Hydrogen production equipment has the potential to cover a market of approximately £4 billion annually by 2050 and stationary fuel cells used for vehicles could make up a traded market of £15 billion annually (Vivid Economics, Energy Innovations Needs Assessment: Hydrogen and fuel cells, 2019).
Value of UK exports related to industrial decarbonisation technologies in 2050
Source: EINA Industry Report, 2019
- £1.4 billion added to GVA per annum by 2050
- 18,000 jobs supported by 2050
Identifying opportunities and promoting exports is one of government’s key objectives across the economy. We are working to secure global investment to support the growth of the UK’s green industrial base, growing supply chain capability and capacity across the UK, reducing the cost of clean growth technologies and creating sustainable opportunities for the UK to reduce emissions overseas through our exports. The UK low carbon export opportunities will be further supported by the UK Global Tariff Schedule launched in May 2020, which seeks to promote net zero industry through the reduction of tariffs on over 100 products to back renewable energy, energy efficiency, carbon capture, and the circular economy. At the WTO, the UK has joined a new group focused on advancing the sustainable trade agenda – the Structured Discussions on Trade and Environmental Sustainability – and will be exploring options to build on progress we have made on Environmental Goods and Services liberalisation. Finally, we will deploy UK Export Finance’s £2 billion Clean Growth Direct Lending Facility to international clean growth projects and create export opportunities for the UK supply chain through UKEF’s network of international export finance executives. We will open these international opportunities by connecting UK suppliers and providing trade finance support to enable SMEs across the whole of the UK to internationalise their activities.
Case study: Food and drink
Food and drink processing and the manufacturing of the packaging they go in are both sources of industrial emissions in the UK. The food and drink industries are also major exporters, with products such as whisky, salmon and chocolate being exported across the world. In 2020, the Food and Drink Federation published a report Decarbonisation of heat across the food and drink manufacturing sector, which sets out how the sector can achieve a net zero carbon footprint by 2050. Decarbonisation options for the sector focus on electrifying processes and fuel switching to low carbon gas such as hydrogen for high grade heat processes. Government and the sector will need to work together to deploy these technologies and ensure our businesses are able to decarbonise, and take advantage of the new international collaboration and export opportunities that will follow in the coming decades.
Action 7.5: Continue to work with key international organisations, countries and initiatives to encourage industrial decarbonisation in developing countries
Direct emissions from industry could be 28% lower in 2050 if industrial decarbonisation is supported in developing countries (Vivid Economics, BEIS ICF Mitigation Investment Options, 2020). Since 2012 we have committed £70 million of Official Development Assistance (ODA) for promoting carbon capture, usage and storage, a critical technology for decarbonising industry in developing countries.
Last year, we announced £15 million of UK international climate finance (ODA) through a new Clean Energy Innovation Facility to support research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) in developing countries to decarbonise industry. In addition, we committed up to £27 million to two programmes that help developing countries design and implement carbon taxes and emissions trading systems. These have shaped carbon taxes in Chile, South Africa and Mexico, and China’s national ETS, which will be the largest carbon-pricing instrument in the world by coverage.
Chapter 8: Levelling up
Overcoming geographic inequalities is a key priority for this government. The manufacturing sector is a crucial part of local economies across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, often providing well-paid jobs in areas where salaries fall below the UK average. For example, in 2020, the average steel wage was £34,000, almost 50% higher than the average in Wales and the Yorkshire and Humber regions (NOMIS, Official Labour Market Statistics, 2020) (ONS, Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2020)[footnote 9]. It is therefore vital that the manufacturing sector thrives now and in the future.
Decarbonisation is an opportunity to transform the UK’s industrial regions, attracting inward investment, future proofing businesses and securing the long-term viability of jobs. As we set out in the Ten Point Plan, building back better can also help repair the economic damage of COVID-19 and put in motion a Green Industrial Revolution. This plan, which is part of the government’s mission to level up the country, will mobilise £13 billion of government investment, to create and support up to 250,000 green jobs throughout the UK (HM Government, Ten Point Plan, 2020).
While reaching net zero is our ultimate goal, decarbonising industry will have benefits that span beyond reducing emissions. Latest statistics show, between 1990 and 2019, the UK has reduced emissions by 44% (BEIS, Final UK greenhouse gas emissions national statistics: 1990 to 2019), while growing the economy by 78% (ONS, Gross Domestic Product: chained volume measures, 2021). This trend can continue with a low carbon industrial sector that drives economic growth and supports green jobs. Figure 8.1 demonstrates the range of areas of potential growth offered by industrial decarbonisation. From building new infrastructure for innovative technologies, to developing the circular economy value chain, decarbonisation presents a significant opportunity to boost the UK’s economy and revitalise our industrial heartlands.
Figure 8.1: Opportunities from decarbonisation – examples of the five channels of potential growth
Illustrative example of the five channels of potential growth from decarbonisation (BEIS analysis, 2020).
1. Competitiveness of existing industry
- Efficiency (boosts competitiveness)
- Increased demand for zero carbon products
2. Circular economy value chain
- Reuse and repair of products
- Recycling and remanufacturing of materials
- Industrial Symbiosis
3. Net zero technologies
4. New net zero manufacturing
- Innovative new sectors offering low carbon products
5. Low carbon services
- Software, Intellectual Property (IP)
- Other services e.g. food and drink, hospitality and transport
To help regions across the UK to benefit from the low carbon transition, government will:
Action 8.1: Unlock new job opportunities through deployment of low carbon infrastructure in industrial areas
Earlier chapters in this strategy set out the need to build new infrastructure that will be required to use technologies like CCUS and low carbon hydrogen. There is – particularly across the UK’s industrial clusters – significant potential to create new jobs through the deployment of low carbon infrastructure and technologies. For example, our commitment to support deployment of CCUS could help to create 50,000 jobs alone in the UK by 2030 (HM Government, Ten Point Plan, 2020).
As demonstrated in Figure 8.2, UK industry is located across different areas of the UK, with significant clusters based outside of London and the South East. We have published, as an annex to this strategy, a delivery plan for industrial clusters, summarising how we will work with industry and local communities to achieve our bold ambition to establish four low carbon industrial clusters by 2030 and at least one net zero industrial cluster by 2040. Successful deployment of low carbon technology in these areas could result in new job creation across Teesside, Yorkshire and the Humber, Black Country, North West of England, Solent region, Scotland and South Wales. For example, analysis carried out by Vivid Economics illustrates that UK-wide deployment of CCUS and low carbon hydrogen has the potential to support up to 33,000 direct jobs and £2.5 billion in direct GVA in 2030, across a number of decarbonisation projects based in the Humber, Teesside, Scotland and the North West (Vivid Economics, Capturing Carbon at Drax: Delivering Jobs, Clean Growth and Levelling up the Humber, 2020).
To supplement the investment in infrastructure and new technologies discussed in Chapters 2 and 4, we will explore the action required to help create new job opportunities for those based in industrial regions while enabling rollout of low carbon infrastructure across the UK.
Action 8.2: Support the skills transition so that the current and future workforce benefit from the creation of new jobs
As the low carbon industrial sector grows and new jobs are created, there will be an opportunity for local people to take advantage of new jobs across industry and its supply chain. As the skills requirement evolves with industry’s adoption of low carbon technologies, we will need to make sure that local workers are supported in the transition from high carbon to low carbon jobs.
Government schemes and policies will play a vital role in supporting this transition to ensure that businesses can appropriately upskill and retrain their staff. The future workforce will also need to be equipped with the right skills to help them succeed in a low carbon world; supporting sustainability through the education system will be crucial. In September 2020, we introduced the first wave of T Levels, new technical study programmes for 16-to 19-year-olds that combine classroom learning with a substantive industry placement. Pathways in construction, engineering and manufacturing and agriculture will support progression into skilled occupations related to sustainability, including areas of sustainable construction and renewable energy. The Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education has set up a Green Apprenticeship Advisory Panel which is supported by a wider green community. The panel and community will inform the Institute’s strategy on apprenticeships and the creation of new apprenticeships suited to a low carbon workforce.
As announced in the Ten Point Plan, the government’s Green Jobs Taskforce will develop recommendations for an action plan to support 2 million good quality, green jobs by 2030. Building on the findings of the Green Jobs Taskforce, we will be developing our evidence base on the skills needed in a low carbon industrial sector. This will inform our understanding of the skills requirement to achieve our industrial decarbonisation ambition, and whether any further government action is needed to support the transition.
We also acknowledge that as more workers acquire the skills to implement low carbon technologies, we must ensure we have the supply chain capabilities to achieve our ambition. As set out in Chapter 4, we will support the development of a UK based supply chain and ensure that this can meet the demands of future low carbon jobs and wider industrial decarbonisation efforts.
Action 8.3: Create incentives for new industrial sectors to base themselves in the UK’s industrial hubs and promote opportunities to attract foreign investment
We want the UK to be the world’s most innovative economy and the best place to start and grow a business. As well as decarbonising existing industry, we want to grow future industrial sectors and position the UK as a world leader in the production of low carbon industrial goods. We want to encourage global investment in our old and new industrial sectors, increasing our competitiveness, innovation and expertise. There is scope for the UK to achieve competitive advantage in the industrial sectors of the future, for example speciality chemicals and production of electric vehicles.
High Potential Opportunities (HPOs) are one of several investment support programmes designed to promote foreign investment into innovative areas of the economy, with recent funding supporting a range of decarbonisation projects across the UK’s manufacturing sector. For example, the HPO programme has identified that Manchester has the potential to become a ‘super-centre’ for sustainable packaging design and manufacture in the food and drink sector.
Other government policy that can support investment in low carbon manufacturing include:
- the new Office for Investment, encouraging foreign investment into the UK and ensuring that this drives economic recovery and growth across the UK
- recently announced ‘Investment Champions’ across the Midlands Engine and Northern Powerhouse, helping to showcase the region’s strengths and attract foreign investment
Freeports will also play a key role as we level up across the country. A number of industrial clusters are located in or nearby UK ports. We will establish Freeports as national hubs for global trade and inward investment across the UK. A Freeport is usually defined as a place to carry out business inside a country’s land border but where different customs rules apply. The UK’s bespoke, flexible Freeports model goes further, combining customs zones with tax reliefs, planning freedoms and support for regeneration and innovation.
As part of Budget 2021, following a fair, open and transparent selection process, eight Freeport locations in England have been announced at East Midlands airport, Felixstowe and Harwich (Freeport East), Humber, Liverpool city region, Plymouth and South Devon, Solent, Thames, and Teesside. We expect the first Freeports to be operational this Autumn. There are ongoing discussions with the administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to establish at least one Freeport in each nation as soon as possible.
We will continue to design policy to attract investment in the UK’s manufacturing sectors, encouraging businesses to locate themselves in the UK’s industrial clusters, where they will have the potential to benefit from low carbon infrastructure in the future.
Case study: EV battery production
As part of our ambition to develop and embed the next generation of zero emission technologies and vehicles in the UK, we have committed to investing nearly £500 million through the Automotive Transformation Fund (ATF) over the next four years. This is part of our commitment to provide up to £1 billion to support the electrification of UK vehicles and their supply chains. Securing battery cell manufacturing (‘gigafactories’) is a priority as this will help to anchor the mass manufacture of electric vehicles in the UK, safeguarding jobs, and driving emissions to net zero by 2050.
Targeted investment in motors, drives, power electronics and hydrogen fuel cells is also a priority. This commitment will boost international investment into our strong manufacturing bases, supporting the 167,000 existing jobs in the automotive sector including the clusters of activity in the Midlands and North East (ONS, Annual Business Survey 2018 data, 2020). ATF support is available to businesses and investors in all parts of the UK.
Action 8.4: Work with devolved government across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to unlock barriers to decarbonisation
Successful utilisation of this strategy, including on jobs and skills, will require leadership and support at a regional level. We will continue to strengthen relationships with local government across England, and with the devolved administrations, to understand and unlock the unique barriers to decarbonisation faced by industry across the UK.
Regions across England
In England, local government can play an important role in supporting the delivery of industrial decarbonisation, being most informed about local skills and infrastructure needs. Government can steer local action through working with places as they develop local economic strategies or local plans for economic recovery and encouraging pan-regional partnerships such as the Northern Powerhouse and Midlands Engine to set decarbonisation as a key focus. Following publication, we will continue to work closely with local and regional partners across England to champion the local voice, to ensure the economic benefits are captured locally and to understand and overcome any barriers to decarbonisation that prevent implementation of this strategy.
In 2019, the UK government committed to meeting a UK wide net zero target by 2050. The Scottish Government has legislated to reach its own net zero target by 2045. The Welsh Government currently has a legislated target for a 95% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 (against a 1990 baseline), but has recently laid new legislation before the Senedd to amend this target to net zero by 2050. Northern Ireland currently does not have a separate target.
While decarbonisation presents an exciting opportunity for the UK, there are unique challenges and opportunities for industrial decarbonisation in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Government funding has been designed to support the decarbonisation of industry across the UK. For example, the £170 million Industrial Decarbonisation Challenge has so far committed £8 million to industrial cluster projects, including those in Scotland and South Wales to advance their cluster decarbonisation plans. The Energy Innovation programme is accelerating the commercialisation of innovative clean energy technologies with £100 million available for industrial decarbonisation across all nations.
The case studies set out below demonstrate the key role that industrial decarbonisation could play in supporting devolved nations to reach net zero. The allocation of new government support to these particular clusters remains subject to future decision-making processes. We will continue to work with devolved administrations to ensure that UK policy is designed in a way that supports Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland as well as the UK overall.
Project Acorn, Scotland
A range of Scottish industrial stakeholders have developed plans to decarbonise the Lothian/Grangemouth/Fife to St Fergus industrial cluster, one of the largest in the UK. Project Acorn’s plans include establishing CCS infrastructure and development of a scalable hydrogen production hub that offers significant benefits to the UK economy. If these plans are developed further, the proposals could help achieve Scotland’s net zero target, as well as economic growth and an energy and job transition for Scotland.
South Wales Industrial Cluster
Ambitious plans are in place to decarbonise a number of industrial sites across South Wales. A collaborative partnership of businesses in Wales are seeking to explore what infrastructure is required to develop large scale CCUS projects, as well as a hydrogen economy for Wales. A transition to a low carbon future in Wales could help support local communities, create new jobs and contribute to local economic growth. It could also position Wales as a key area for possible inward investment.
Encirc, Northern Ireland (Glass)
Unlike other parts of the UK, Northern Ireland does not have large industrial clusters. Manufacturing in Northern Ireland spans a number of dispersed sites across advanced and heavy engineering, life sciences and agri-food sectors. One example is Encirc, a glass manufacturer that supplies glass bottles to a range of food and drink producers. Encirc’s 2021 fuel switching project in partnership with Glass Futures saw it switch one of its furnaces from natural gas to a sustainable biofuel (derived from organic waste). Encirc used 100% recycled glass as part of the trial, creating sustainable glass bottles and demonstrating that furnaces can operate without the need for fossil fuels. Encirc has been investigating options for deep decarbonisation across all of its operations, including the production of green hydrogen from renewable electricity. This could enable Encirc to fully decarbonise its production and transport operations, and potentially become carbon negative.
Chapter 9: Tracking progress
Industrial decarbonisation is a complex process and it is imperative that we take action now to reach our 2050 goals. The UK already has a well-established system for reporting on emissions through the carbon budgets, a process that is supported by the independent Climate Change Committee (CCC). There are also various schemes for industry to report on emissions and energy use. In this strategy, we are setting out new ambitions for a thriving low carbon industrial sector and the technologies that will underpin that. For this reason, we need additional indicators to measure our progress. We want to see significant emission reductions, but there are other changes we need to track too. For example, we need to track the deployment of new infrastructure that will enable widespread capture and storage of carbon dioxide, as well as monitoring the growth of green jobs in industry.
This chapter sets out our principles for tracking progress, the indicators and examples of metrics we plan to use and how we will report on them.
The UK is setting world-leading ambition for decarbonisation. There are few international standards in this space and our approach will set a benchmark that others can follow. We aim to track progress effectively while minimising the burden on industry and government. To be successful, our approach needs to be:
- strategic in aligning to our wider goals for clean growth and levelling up, making sure we reduce emissions in the UK without pushing them abroad
- effective in providing insightful results that allow us to assess progress, hold government and industry to account and take remedial action if needed
- proportionate in the burden this puts on industry and government, making best use of existing data sources and encouraging firms to champion their own results
- flexible and responsive to changes in technologies, society and the market for industrial products, which could require changing the indicators in the future
Both government and industry have a responsibility to keep the public informed about progress on decarbonisation.
Every year, government publishes a response to the Climate Change Committee’s (CCC) annual progress report. This response outlines the progress made in decarbonising each of the major sectors, including industry, reporting on current levels of emissions and energy use, and responding to the recommendations of the CCC. We will use this response to inform the public on progress against the actions set out in this strategy and the indicators and metrics set out in this chapter.
Low carbon technology, industry and society will change over time. Policy will need to adapt as we learn more about industrial decarbonisation, drawing on lessons from home and abroad. We therefore plan to review the actions in this strategy and update them where needed every five years.
Shareholders, customers and employees will take an increasing interest in the actions industry is taking to decarbonise and company reporting is an important resource to inform public debate. Noting this importance, we are proposing forthcoming regulations to require climate-related financial disclosures, as referenced in Chapter 3.
We need concrete measures to assess progress against the ambitions set out in Chapter 1 of this strategy. Table 9.1 gives example metrics that allow regular comparisons over time. These link directly to our ambitions, as shown in Table 9.1. We will test and develop these indicators with stakeholders and provide further details in the next progress report.
As described in this strategy, there are different phases to industrial decarbonisation. Some metrics, like efficiency improvements and engineering studies for infrastructure, will be particularly important in the 2020s. Others, such as the percentage of low carbon industrial products in circulation, will be more relevant in future decades. We can also add new metrics in the future in response to developments in technological innovation and economic and societal change.
Emissions and energy use data is already collected through several schemes, including the Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting scheme and the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) for larger energy users. Areas where more work may be needed include the evidence base for smaller site emissions, energy and resource efficiency, embodied carbon in products and materials and full life cycle assessment data. Carbon savings from CCUS are not currently reported but we will monitor progress in line with specific CCUS programmes. As robust sources of evidence in these areas are not yet available, we will monitor developments in these evidence bases and report on them in the future.
This strategy shows it is possible to have a thriving industrial sector consistent with our net zero target. Government, communities, industry and customers now need to put this strategy into practice. Our delivery plan (Annex 1) summarises the actions in this strategy and what we plan to do in the next two years to make progress. This year, we will set out our overall Net Zero Strategy, which will build on this strategy and other sectoral strategies, by showing how the whole economy will achieve net zero emissions by 2050.
There will be big decisions to take in the 2020s: where to build infrastructure first, how to make all low carbon technologies commercially attractive, and how to treat imports and exports as industry decarbonises. These decisions will be based on the best evidence, ideas and expertise. In parallel, we will also need adaptation action, building resilience to the effects of climate change we are already experiencing.
Climate change is a global issue, and the UK must use our own net zero ambition to encourage other nations to adopt similar targets. In November 2021, the UK will host the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Conference of the Parties (COP26), bringing together world leaders, climate experts, business leaders and citizens to agree ambitious action to tackle climate change. The Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy demonstrates the UK’s commitment to net zero in an area of the economy that was often labelled as too hard to decarbonise. By showing that it can be done, we hope to encourage similar levels of action from others around the world.
Table 9.1: Measuring progress against our ambitions
|Strategy ambition||Example metric|
|Industrial clusters. Four major industrial clusters linked up to the necessary decarbonisation infrastructure by 2030, and the world’s first net zero industrial cluster by 2040||Number of clusters connected to low carbon infrastructure|
|Industry to consume an increasing amount of low carbon fuels (Hydrogen, Electricity, Bioenergy) during the 2020s, reaching around 20 TWh by 2030||Amount of low carbon fuels used in industry (TWh)|
|Around 3 Mt CO2 of industry emissions captured each year by 2030||Amount of CO2 captured in industry (MtCO2)|
|Continued improvement in energy, resource and material efficiency and increased material substitution consistent with pathways to net zero from latest government modelling||Remaining potential of energy efficiency, resource efficiency and material substitution to be achieved based on latest government modelling|
|Development of a market for low carbon materials||We will work with industry to develop a set of indicators which appropriately reflect relevant considerations such as embodied carbon and life cycle assessment|
|Improve the skills base across the UK in line with required deployment of low carbon technologies||Number of low carbon manufacturing jobs available in different areas of UK|
|Cooperation with other leading nations and support to the developing world to ensure that industrial decarbonisation is happening across the globe||Number of countries signed up to key multilateral industry decarbonisation organisations/initiatives or bilateral cooperation on industrial decarbonisation|
Figure 9.1: Indicative strategic indicator framework
|2050 goal||Stop UK industry’s contribution to global warming||Lead in low carbon manufacturing||Share the costs and opportunities fairly across the regions of the UK|
|Indicator / metric||Greenhouse gas emissions
– UK industry emissions
– amount of carbon captured and stored in industry (MtCO2)Efficiency
– level of energy loss (kWh)
– level of material waste
– key technologies ready for large-scale use
– low carbon fuels used in industry (TWh)Infrastructure
– number of engineering studies completed
– number of clusters connected to low carbon infrastructure
– number of low carbon manufacturing jobs available in different areas of UKLow carbon industrial products
– to be developed with industry as demand-side policy is progressed
Annex 1: Industrial decarbonisation strategy delivery plan
|No.||Action||Timeframe||2021 to 2022|
|1.1||We will change the policy landscape, creating a set of incentives that are coherent and enough to drive emissions in line with our carbon budget targets and all the way to net zero 2050.||2030||Embed strategy principles into key policy decisions: UK ETS reforms; CCUS and low carbon hydrogen business models development; demand-side policy call for evidence.|
|2.1||Use carbon pricing as a tool to send a clear market signal, providing certainty over our net zero ambition for industrial sectors.||2020s-2050s||This will include consulting on a net zero consistent emissions cap; reviewing the long-term role of free allowances; exploring expanding the scope of the scheme to cover more sectors of the economy; exploring linking with other schemes internationally; and considering the case for a supply adjustment mechanism|
|2.2||Put in place funding mechanisms to support deployment and use of CCUS and low carbon hydrogen infrastructure||2020s-2040s||Publish initial business models for CCUS (2021) and low carbon hydrogen (2022)|
|2.3||Establish the right policy framework to ensure uptake of fuel switching||2020s||Launch a call for evidence on energy affordability|
|2.4||Take initial steps to create a market for negative emissions technologies||2020s||Publish response to the Greenhouse Gas Removals Call for Evidence.|
|2.5||Establish a targeted approach to mitigating carbon leakage.||2020s-2030s||Review the design of the UK ETS, including the long-term role of free allowances.|
|2.6||Work with stakeholders to understand how an EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism could affect the UK.||2020s-2030s||Engage with EU and UK business, academic and government stakeholders to understand how the policy could affect UK industry.|
|3.1||Develop proposals to improve data transparency.||2023||Call for evidence on low carbon products to include data collection to support demand-side measures.|
|3.2||Develop proposals for new product standards.||2025||Call for evidence on low carbon products to include defining low carbon products.|
|3.3||Develop proposals for product labelling.||2020s||Consider benefits of labelling system for intermediary products.|
|3.4||Use public procurement to drive change.||2020s-2050s||Develop Clean Energy Ministerial initiative on coordinated public procurement action; publish National Procurement Policy Statement.|
|3.5||Support businesses to make greener choices.||2020s-2050s||Engagement with businesses to understand how government can support changes in procurement practices and encourage consolidated demand via buyers’ alliances.|
|4.1||Support deployment of CCUS on industrial sites in clusters to capture and store around 3 MtCO2 per year by 2030.||2030||Announce Industrial Decarbonisation Challenge Deployment Phase 2 winners. Publish Initial business models for CCUS (2021). Response to consultation on Carbon capture, usage and storage: market engagement on cluster sequencing.|
|4.2||Support increasing amounts of fuel switching to low carbon fuels during the 2020s.||2020s-2030s||Develop production of hydrogen through the Net Zero Hydrogen Fund and publish Hydrogen Strategy. Launch a call for evidence on energy affordability. Publish the Bioenergy Strategy in 2022.|
|4.3||Consider the implications of the recommendation of the Climate Change Committee to set targets for ore-based steelmaking to reach near-zero emissions by 2035.||2020s||Collaborate with the Steel Council to understand the business environment necessary to support the transition.|
|4.4||Work with industry to understand what is required to make sites retrofit-ready.||2020s||Assess the feasibility of mandating that new equipment is retrofit ready.|
|4.5||Work with the cement sector to explore options to decarbonise sites in dispersed locations.||2020s||Engage with the minerals industry to consider options for dispersed sites, building on the report published in August 2020 (BEIS, CCS deployment at dispersed industrial sites, 2020).|
|4.6||Review policies to address specific barriers faced by less energy‑intensive, dispersed sites.||Early 2020s||Undertake analysis of current and emerging energy policies and engage with less energy‑intensive, dispersed sites.|
|4.7||Ensure planning reforms brought forward as part of Project Speed support the delivery of low carbon infrastructure||2020s||Review planning regimes to enable net zero to be delivered at pace.|
|4.8||Improve coordination between decarbonisation and environmental policies to meet a common sustainability agenda.||2020s||Assess synergies and alignment between decarbonisation and environmental policies.|
|5.1||Support sites to install energy management systems.||Early 2020s||Encourage organisations to adhere to the requirements set by international energy management standards.|
|5.2||Improve heat recovery and reuse across industry, particularly in sites which use high temperature processes.||2020s||Develop projects through the Industrial Heat Recovery Support (IHRS) programme (closed to new applications but funding will be provided until 2022) and the Industrial Energy Transformation Fund (IETF), with phase 2 of the IETF launching in 2021.|
|5.3||Help less energy‑intensive, dispersed industrial sites improve energy efficiency through the adoption of technologies available in the market with low payback times.||2020s||Review how sites can adopt energy efficiency solutions, with measures being considered including audit programmes, expert advice, and training for SMEs as well as expanded funding schemes and finance options.|
|5.4||Develop a communications plan to make industry aware of the support that is already available to increase energy efficiency.||Early 2020s||Develop a plan which focuses on providing direct advice, advice on best practice, behaviour changes and digital solutions.|
|5.5||Support increased resource efficiency and material substitution within industry, by driving the transition towards a circular economy model and increasing reuse, repair and remanufacturing.||2020s||Publish modified Waste Prevention Programme.|
|6.1||Support innovation in fuel switching technologies, including low carbon electricity, biomass and hydrogen.||2020s-2040s||Utilise funds from the Net Zero Innovation Portfolio to accelerate the development of electrification and hydrogen/biomass fuel switching.|
|6.2||Support first-of-a-kind demonstration of CCUS from a range of industrial sources.||Mid 2020s||Support CCUS innovation through the Carbon Capture and Utilisation Demonstration (CCUD) Innovation Programme.|
|6.3||Support the development of industrial digital technologies to maximise efficiency improvements.||Early 2020s||Support research and analysis into funding, feasibility and deployment of the latest digital technologies, through the Manufacturing Made Smarter Challenge programme.|
|6.4||Support research into advanced technologies.||2020s||Analyse opportunities and develop an approach towards utilising digitalisation technologies to support industrial decarbonisation ambitions using advanced technologies to support industrial decarbonisation ambitions.|
|6.5||Support advancements in product innovation.||2020s–2050||Incentivise the uptake of smarter designs of industrial products and more efficient technologies through programmes such as Made Smarter.|
|7.1||Work with our partners to create a coalition of countries committed to shared approaches to developing the market for low carbon products.||2021–2030||Use COP26 and the G7 Presidency to seek joint commitments on using public procurement to drive industrial decarbonisation.|
|7.2||Lead global innovation efforts, through the UK’s leading role in Mission Innovation, to reduce the costs of supplying low carbon industrial products.||2020s–2050||Participate in emerging Missions (public-private innovation alliances); engage the UK private sector, governments and academic in Missions; and share knowledge about innovation advances and successes in UK industry through the Innovation Platform that will be launched as part of MI 2.0.|
|7.3||Support industrial decarbonisation through trade policy.||2020s – 2050||Ensure the UK’s right to meet our Net Zero target is protected within Free Trade Agreements and advance the UK’s climate change objectives at the WTO, with organisations like the OECD and WEF, and as part of the UK’s upcoming G7 presidency.|
|7.4||Capitalise on the export opportunities of having a world-leading net zero industry.||2020s-2050s||Explore further options to build on progress on Environmental Goods and Services liberalisation and ensure UK exports continue to be supported by the UK Global Tariff Schedule and the Clean Growth Direct Lending Facility to create opportunities globally.|
|7.5||Continue to work with key international organisations, countries and initiatives to encourage industrial decarbonisation in developing countries.||2020s-2050s||Support industrial decarbonisation projects with Official Development Assistance through existing programmes: the Clean Energy Innovation Facility and the International CCUS Programme.|
|8.1||Unlock new job opportunities through deployment of low carbon infrastructure in industrial areas.||2020s-2030s||Announce Industrial Decarbonisation Challenge Deployment Phase 2 winners.|
|8.2||Support the skills transition so that the current and future workforce benefit from the creation of new jobs.||2020s||Building on the findings of the Green Jobs Taskforce, further develop our understanding of the skills requirement to achieve our industrial decarbonisation ambition and support educational institutions and industry to deliver.|
|8.3||Create incentives for new industrial sectors to base themselves in the UK’s industrial hubs and promote opportunities to attract foreign investment.||2020s-2040s||Ensure future UK economic growth policy supports investment in the UK’s low carbon manufacturing sector. There are ongoing discussions with the administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to establish at least one Freeport in each nation as soon as possible.|
|8.4||Work with devolved government across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to unlock barriers to decarbonisation.||2020s-2040s||Understand local barriers and opportunities faced by industry and local government in England. Continue to work closely with devolved administrations where devolved powers are required to take forward policy development.|
|9.1||Publish an update on the progress of the Strategy every year in the annual government response to the Climate Change Committee’s progress report. Publish an update of the actions in the strategy every five years.||2020s–2050||Ensure frameworks are in place to publish an update on the progress of the strategy within the annual government response to the Climate Change Committee’s progress report.|
Annex 2: Current UK government industrial decarbonisation policy
The table below details the full set of current UK government policy that directly enables or supports decarbonisation in industry. As set out in Chapter 1, government will build on this policy landscape in the coming years, aligning approaches to our net zero target and introducing new policies to address any outstanding barriers to decarbonisation. All policies are listed in alphabetical order within the associated funding group (the Net Zero Innovation Portfolio is a continuation of the Energy Improvement Programme).
|Industrial Decarbonisation Policy||Policy Aims||Policy Impact|
|Climate Change Levy (CCL)||The scheme acts as an environmental tax on commercial energy use (electricity and gas) applicable to organisations operating in various sectors and aims to promote energy efficiency across industry. Organisations are eligible to receive a reduction in fees related to the main rates of the CCL, if they are an energy-intensive business that has entered into a Climate Change Agreement (CCA) with the Environment Agency.||Industry spending: £510 million per year (2018/19). £2 billion in total per year across all sectors, including industry, agriculture, commercial and public services. Net zero contribution: Maximising energy efficiency is essential for achieving net zero.|
|UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS)||The UK ETS aims to provide a long-term carbon price signal for UK heavy industry, aviation and power sectors to incentivise sector decarbonisation and support the UK to meet its legally binding carbon reduction targets.||Industry spending: £390 million per year (based on previous EU ETS costs for 2019). Net zero contribution: The cap (limit on emissions) will be aligned with net zero by 2024. The initial cap has been set 5% below the UK’s notional share of the EU ETS for Phase IV to ensure long-term carbon reduction across industry.|
|Industrial Decarbonisation Policy||Policy Aims||Policy Impact|
|Climate Change Agreements (CCAs)||CCAs have the dual aim of supporting industrial businesses to achieve energy and carbon savings through energy efficiency improvements; while helping to reduce energy use in energy-intensive sectors by providing a significant discount on the CCL payments. Operators who achieve the required improvements in energy efficiency and reduced carbon emissions are certified to continue to receive the CCL payments discount.||Government spending: £200 to 300 million per year. Net zero contribution: Collectively, the scheme secures savings of 0.3 – 0.7 MtCO2e per annum. Uptake of the scheme represents 80-100% of businesses participating in most eligible sectors; covering an estimated 114 TWh of energy use in 2018 (approximately 43% of all industry) 98% of participants have taken some action on energy efficiency since the start of the second CCA scheme. Annual energy savings attributable to the scheme are 1.2-2.3 TWh (BEIS, Evaluation of the Second Climate Change Agreements scheme, 2020).|
|Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) free allowances||Under the UK ETS, energy-intensive industries are eligible to receive a volume of emissions allowances for free, with the aim of minimising the risk of industries being disadvantaged due to increased financial costs associated with the purchasing of allowances. Free Allocation is the main policy instrument through which carbon leakage risk and competitiveness impacts are addressed under the UK ETS.||Government spending: £1.05 billion per year (in 2019) Net zero contribution: Maintaining the Free Allocation of allowances under the UK ETS fulfils the government’s commitment that any replacement of the EU ETS would be at least as environmentally ambitious in terms of carbon emissions reductions.|
|Financial relief for Energy Intensive Industries (electricity costs)||The policy aims to provide relief (compensation and exemption) for certain energy-intensive industries facing high electricity costs to reduce the risk that investment in the UK will be lost. With renewable energy and carbon reduction schemes increasing electricity prices for industry, government manages schemes to support businesses that are most at risk to help offset costs.||Government Spending: £470 million per year (a mixture of spending and bill discounts). Net zero contribution: Alongside direct compensation for UK ETS and Carbon Price Support cost passthrough, discounts on energy bills are provided under schemes such as Contracts for Difference, Renewables Obligation, and the Feed- in-Tariff. These measures support the competitiveness of energy-intensive industries in the UK, enabling investment in new and more efficient technologies, and supporting jobs and supply chains across the UK.|
|Industrial decarbonisation policy||Policy aims||Policy impact|
|Energy Innovation Programme (EIP) (2016 – 2021)||The programme aims to accelerate the commercialisation of innovative clean energy technologies and processes across industry into the 2020s and 2030s. The Programme has provided direct investment to unlock and deliver opportunities and projects across industry in relation to smart systems, energy efficiency and heating, Carbon Capture Usage and Storage (CCUS), nuclear, renewables, energy entrepreneurs and green financing.||Government spending: £100 million assigned to industry and CCUS from 2016-2021.Total of £505 million for entire programme funds. Net zero contribution: As part of the £100m assigned to industry and CCUS within the programme, a range of decarbonisation schemes have been developed across a number of industries, including: Low Carbon Hydrogen Supply competition, CCUS Innovation Programme, Industrial Fuel Switching Programme, Accelerating CCUS Technologies, Industrial Energy Efficiency Accelerator and the Carbon Capture and Utilisation Demonstration Innovation Programme.|
|Net Zero Innovation Portfolio (2021- 2025)||The portfolio aims to build on the funding streams and projects delivered to support industrial decarbonisation under the Energy Innovation Programme (EIP). This supports the UK’s vision to be a global leader in the technologies needed to decarbonise industry and economies to transition to net zero through the utilisation of new technologies and carbon reduction initiatives.||Government spending: £200 million per year. Total of £1 billion from 2021-2026. Net zero contribution: Building on the projects funded as part of the EIP, the Portfolio will enable the development of innovative technology deployment across industry, with funding dedicated towards key areas of industrial decarbonisation, including: hydrogen, CCUS, bioenergy and disruptive technologies such as artificial intelligence for energy management.|
|Industrial Decarbonisation Challenge (IDC)||The IDC aims to accelerate the cost-effectiveness of decarbonisation across industrial clusters by supporting the development of low carbon technologies such as CCUS and hydrogen at scale. The IDC will demonstrate and validate decarbonisation measures through funding the uptake of engineering plans; business plans; the demonstration of cost-effective technologies and processes; and enabling deployment of core infrastructure.||Government spending: £170 million from 2019 – 2024. Net zero contribution: Through the rollout of the decarbonisation of industrial clusters, development of industrial cluster decarbonisation roadmaps and the creation of the Industrial Decarbonisation Research and Innovation Centre (IDRIC), the Fund will directly support the facilitation of four low-carbon industrial clusters by 2030 and at least one net zero cluster by 2040.|
|Transforming Foundation Industries (TFI)||The programme aims to bring businesses from different Foundation Industries together to work on common resource and energy efficiency opportunities. Funds will be applied on a cross-sector basis and designed to improve collaboration and research aimed at improving the productivity and competitiveness of the sectors’ companies and supply chains.||Government spending: £66 million from 2020-2025. Net zero contribution: The programme will enable carbon reduction across the Foundation Industries. Collectively, these sectors produce 75% of all the materials in the UK economy and account for approximately 10% of the UK’s total carbon emissions (UKRI, 2020). Measures will ensure that key industrial sectors remain competitive and are ready to meet the government’s commitment of net zero carbon by 2050.|
Deployment and infrastructure funding
|Industrial decarbonisation policy||Policy aims||Policy impact|
|CCUS Infrastructure Fund||The fund aims to support the development of business models and enable the deployment of Carbon Capture Usage and Storage (CCUS) across energy‑intensive industries to enable organisations to remain economically competitive while reducing carbon emissions. Decarbonisation will be achieved through stimulating future private sector investment in CCUS, driving scale-up and market development to support initial carbon capture projects and catalysing deployment during the 2030s.||Government spending: £100 million per year. Total of £1 billion from 2021 – 2030. Net zero contribution: The fund will facilitate the delivery of CCUS at four clusters, two by the mid-2020s and a further two by 2030. (HM Government, Ten Point Plan, 2020). This will enable the fund to directly support deployment of at least 3 MtCO2 of CCUS on industrial sites in clusters by 2030 and up to 14.3 MtCO2 by 2050.|
|Clean Steel Fund||The fund aims to enable the transition to lower carbon iron and steel production through supporting new technologies and processes, placing the sector on a pathway that is consistent with achieving a net zero target and harnessing clean growth opportunities.||Government spending: £250 million total funds (in development as of January 2021) Net zero contribution: Organisations operating in the steel industry will benefit from the adoption of energy efficiency and low carbon technologies to decarbonise manufacturing processes and contribute to the development of wider renewable energy, CCUS and hydrogen deployment strategies.|
|Heat Network Improvement Programme (HNIP)||The programme has a number of financial and environmental aims, including the ability to increase the number of heat networks being built across different industries, deliver carbon savings and help create the conditions necessary for a sustainable heat network market to develop.||Government spending: £106.7 million per year. Total of £320 million from 2019 – 2021. Net zero contribution: The programme directly contributes towards the development of low carbon heat production across industry and the requirement to ensure that 18% of heat in the UK comes from heat networks by 2050 if the UK is to meet carbon targets in a cost-effective manner. (BEIS, Clean Growth – Transforming Heat, 2018).|
|Industrial Energy Efficiency Accelerator [part of the Energy Innovation Programme]||The scheme aims to increase the number of innovative energy efficiency technologies available to industry to help reduce energy consumption and cut carbon emissions, while strengthening the global competitiveness of UK industry in sectors including manufacturing. The accelerator seeks to deploy industry-specific solutions which are close to commercialisation by leveraging private sector investment and strengthening supply chains to reduce energy costs for UK industry.||Government spending: £2.6 million per year. Total of £13 million from 2017 – 2021. Net zero contribution: Technology developers and companies have carried out innovative energy saving projects through the programme. Successful projects include ultrasonic technology to reduce the energy required for plastics manufacturing, highly efficient cooling technologies for data centres and low energy fertiliser production from wastewater.|
|Industrial Energy Transformation Fund (IETF)||The fund aims to help businesses with high energy use, including energy‑intensive industries, to invest in energy efficiency and low carbon technologies to reduce carbon emissions and energy bills. These measures will enable UK industry to cut emissions in the near-term and bring down costs and risk for wider decarbonisation to help achieve net zero 2050.||Government spending: Approximately £71.25 million per year (variable amounts depending on funding window). Total of £315 million from 2020 until at least 2024. Net zero contribution: Energy efficiency of industrial processes will be improved by bringing payback of projects within an investable range for company decision makers and by incentivising early movers by making low-carbon investment financially more attractive than alternative, high-carbon alternatives.|
|Industrial Heat Recovery Fund||The fund aims to encourage and support investment in heat recovery technologies. Funding has been made available to support businesses to identify and invest in opportunities for recovery and reusing heat that would otherwise be lost in industrial processes.||Government spending: £3.6 million per year. Total of £18 million from 2018 – 2022. Net zero contribution: The fund has enabled industrial organisations to implement heat recovery technologies in order to lower fuel costs, reduce waste heat, and increase the deployment and uptake of innovative carbon reduction solutions.|
|Net Zero Hydrogen Fund||The fund aims to increase the uptake and generation of hydrogen across industry in order to enable commercially viable fuel switching. Implementation of the scheme will help to develop the market with a sufficient supply of low carbon hydrogen at a competitive price for use across manufacturing and business operations.||Government spending: £60 million per year. Total of £240 million from 2021 – 2025. Net zero contribution: The fund supports the deployment of low carbon hydrogen production and encourages private sector investment. As a result, the programme directly helps to reduce carbon emissions from heavy industry production and aids the transition to zero carbon fuel-use.|
|Renewable Heat Incentive (Non-Domestic)||The scheme provides financial incentives with the aims of increasing the uptake and installation of renewable heat technologies throughout industry and reducing the reliance on fossil fuels. Participating organisations are able receive direct payment as a result of the generation of low-carbon heat, thereby increasing the uptake and deployment of biomass, ground/air source heat pumps, geothermal, solar thermal and CHP technologies across industry.||Government spending: £684 million (in 2019-2020), including commercial, public and industrial premises. £1.01 billion total budget for both domestic/non-domestic schemes in 2019/20. Net zero contribution: 41,393 gigawatt hours of renewable heat have been generated and paid for under the scheme through approximately 20,000 eligible properties (November 2011 – December 2019) (Ofgem, NDRHI Annual Report, 2019-2020, 2020). The scheme supports the UK’s legally binding targets of increasing the amount of heat produced from renewable sources.|
Annex 3: Industrial clusters delivery plan
Industry is a crucial part of the UK’s economy, employing over 2.6 million people in high-quality, skilled jobs and generating exports worth £300 billion in 2018 (ONS, Annual Business Survey, 2020) (ONS, UK Trade in Goods, 2020). However, the sector is also responsible for around 16% of the UK’s emissions and must contribute to reducing emissions to net zero by 2050 while remaining competitive (BEIS, Emissions Publication 1990-2018, Supplementary Tables, 2020).
Progress has already been made. Emissions from industry fell by 64% between 1990 and 2018 (BEIS, Final UK greenhouse gas emissions national statistics: 1990 to 2018, Supplementary tables, 2020) while output grew by 7% (ONS, GDP quarterly national accounts time series, 2020). This largely reflects a combination of improved energy efficiency and a shift to less carbon-intensive energy sources, but we need to go further.
We will work with industry and local communities to achieve four low carbon industrial clusters by 2030 and at least one net zero industrial cluster by 2040. Decarbonising clusters to this timetable supports the wider objectives of this strategy and the government’s net zero target.
About this plan
This Delivery Plan sets out the overarching approach to delivering this goal, with specific actions out to the mid-2020s. It sets out a programme of work that the government will deliver in partnership with industry and relevant stakeholders. At the end of 2022 we will review progress and consider what further actions are required beyond the mid-2020s.
Industry engagement will be important to the implementation of the Delivery Plan, with the government committed to ongoing dialogue on how best to support industrial clusters to decarbonise. This represents a partnership between government, local areas and industry, with policy implementation tailored where appropriate to the needs and features of each local area.
This document is intended to:
- Illustrate the broad range of funding available across government that will support the decarbonisation of industry
- Set out the timeline to achieving our commitment of having four low carbon clusters by 2030 and at least one net zero cluster by 2040.
- Demonstrate how decarbonising clusters will contribute to our long-term ambition of reaching net zero emissions by 2050
- Ensure that we are providing the required support to allow industry to transition to net zero by unlocking investment and innovation, capture the supply chain opportunities, and provide good quality green jobs
Action incudes supporting the deployment of decarbonisation infrastructure, while supporting the development of new markets; supporting innovation; building delivery capability; and ensuring that places and society feel the wider potential benefits – from high-skilled jobs to cleaner air.
Industrial clusters are places where related industries have co-located. Benefits include deploying and utilising shared decarbonisation infrastructure, enabling industry to reduce the unit cost for each tonne of carbon abated as well as opportunities for resource and energy efficiency and learning and innovation sharing.
There are a number of industrial clusters of various sizes, locations, and emissions levels across the UK. Figure 1 shows the six largest clusters by level of carbon dioxide emissions.
Figure 1 data: major UK industry cluster emissions
|Cluster location||CO2 emissions (MtCO2e)|
Clustered industrial sectors tend to be those that require energy‑intensive manufacturing processes, specifically: chemicals, glass, oil refining, paper and pulp, iron and steel. Figure 2 shows a breakdown of each cluster by industry type.
Figure 2 data: Cluster emissions breakdown by sector (MtCO2e)
|Cluster location||Cement||Chemicals||Food / drink||Iron / steel||Non-ferrous metals||Non-metallic minerals||Other industry||Paper / pulp||Refining|
Many of the clusters are in relatively deprived regions and often act as a driver of prosperity for the surrounding area as key employers paying above the UK median wage (MHCLG, English indices of deprivation, 2019).[footnote 10] For example, in 2020, the average steel wage was £34,000, almost 50% higher than the average in Wales and the Yorkshire and Humber regions (NOMIS, Official Labour Market Statistics, 2020) (ONS, Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2020).[footnote 11] The importance of industrial clusters to local places is illustrated by the fact that the Humber cluster generates approximately £4.8 billion of value to its surrounding area, representing nearly a quarter of the region’s total Gross Value Added (GVA) (ONS, Regional gross value added (balanced) by industry, 20)[footnote 12]
These clusters will be the starting point for a new carbon capture industry, taking advantage of agglomeration benefits and the advantages of co-locating infrastructure. The government committed in its Ten Point Plan to deploying carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) in two industrial clusters by mid 2020s, aiming for four of these sites by 2030, with the goal of capturing up to 10 MtCO2 per year (HM Government, Ten Point Plan, 2020). Developed alongside hydrogen, we can create these transformative “SuperPlaces” in areas such as the heart of the North East, the Humber, North West and in Scotland and Wales. Our £1 billion CCUS Infrastructure Fund will provide industry with the certainty required to deploy CCUS at pace and at scale. Alongside this, we will bring forward details in 2021 of a revenue mechanism to bring through private sector investment in industrial carbon capture and hydrogen projects, to provide the certainty investors require.
While we believe that clusters should be self-identifying, there are four key characteristics that a successful cluster should demonstrate:
1. Clusters should be able to demonstrate cooperation between businesses and organisations across the region, and evidence joint decision-making for the benefit of the wider cluster
2. Clusters should consider wider societal benefits of their activity. For example, the importance of public benefit from local decarbonisation, and alignment with public funding and local priorities
3. Clusters should have a membership that represents the industries within their geographies i.e. not just a small subset. They will have engaged relevant public sector organisations and have support from the communities in which they operate
4. Clusters should realise the wider benefits that decarbonisation can bring for the region, going beyond individual decarbonisation projects. They will ensure a holistic take on benefits to maximise emissions reductions potential and the development of supply chains and jobs
Non-cluster sites will also benefit from much of this plan, including our actions to support innovation, improve delivery capability, build markets, and help society feel the benefits of clean growth.
Delivering these actions will require significant commitment from both government and industry. We will work closely with local and regional partners across England to ensure the economic benefits are realised locally and to understand and overcome any barriers to decarbonisation. We will also continue to strengthen relationships with the devolved administrations to support decarbonisation of clusters based in Scotland and Wales.
These actions will focus on supporting the deployment of initial decarbonisation infrastructure, enabling technological innovation to reduce the costs of decarbonisation, encouraging investment and finance, increasing the supply of local jobs, and ensuring that there are suitable skills and supply chain to support the transition to net zero.
Government will need to regularly engage with industry to provide better understanding of its progress, opportunities to share knowledge and also address any obstacles to the development of low carbon infrastructure and a market for low carbon products.
Shared infrastructure is crucial to establishing low carbon and net zero clusters but will require significant investment.
Sites within clusters will need to share low carbon infrastructure such as carbon dioxide transport and storage pipelines to provide decarbonisation at least possible cost. While support from government is required to de-risk the early stages, in the long run we will need to unlock private sector investment to achieve rapid large-scale deployment.
We recognise that aside from the capital costs of infrastructure deployment, there will also be increases to operating costs in the short term. Revenue support for projects such as industrial carbon capture and low carbon hydrogen production is critical for the net zero transition. In the long term, cost reductions in low carbon technologies, coupled with a sustainable increase in the carbon price and a thriving market for low carbon products will make decarbonisation economically viable without subsidy.
The government has already supported the early stages of project development in clusters through the Industrial Decarbonisation Challenge. We will continue to support the initial deployment of low-carbon technologies to provide a solid foundation to reduce the costs of future deployment.
Support initial deployment of decarbonisation infrastructure
To support the deployment of low carbon infrastructure in clusters we will:
- invest an additional £40 million through the Industrial Decarbonisation Challenge Fund. This includes:
- £172 million to demonstrate and validate at-scale decarbonisation through the UKRI-led Industrial Decarbonisation Challenge
- £8 million for clusters to develop comprehensive blueprints to achieve net zero emissions
- £20 million for the development of an Industrial Decarbonisation Research and Innovation Centre, to accelerate challenge-led research and transformative innovation
- support the deployment of infrastructure at two carbon capture clusters by the mid-2020s through the £1 billion CCS Infrastructure Fund. A further two clusters will be supported to deployment by 2030
- deploy a £240 million Net Zero Hydrogen Fund for capital co-investment in new low carbon hydrogen production
- the Cluster Sequencing Market Engagement document published in February 2021 sets out a potential approach to determining the deployment sequence of CCUS clusters and for allocating CCUS programme support including the CCS Infrastructure Fund, NZHF and CCUS and hydrogen business model support. We are aiming to seek views on the proposals through the consultation process
- where possible, seek to optimise the re-use of existing oil and gas infrastructure to reduce the overall costs of CCUS projects
Secure revenue mechanism for companies investing in low carbon infrastructure and projects
As set out in the Ten Point Plan and Energy White Paper, we will:
- bring forward details in 2021 of a revenue mechanism to bring through private sector investment into industrial carbon capture and hydrogen projects via our new business models to support these projects
Address barriers to deployment of shared infrastructure
To help address the barriers to deploying shared infrastructure, in 2021 we will:
- as part of Project Speed, the new infrastructure taskforce, determine how the efficiency of the planning system can be improved to deploy low carbon infrastructure in clusters
- engage clusters to determine whether there are non-physical infrastructure requirements to enable the deployment of shared infrastructure and the potential role of government to support this
Support a range of decarbonisation projects
In addition to supporting deployment of shared infrastructure, we will also support decarbonisation of specific sites and sectors by deploying other funds that will result in emissions reductions.
- deploy £315 million of funding for energy efficiency and decarbonisation projects[footnote 13]
- deploy the £66 million Transforming Foundation Industries Challenge to reduce energy and resource in the UK’s foundation industries
- develop a policy framework to facilitate greater resource efficiency in industry
- seek to incentivise industry to practice industrial symbiosis
Our approach to the deployment of sustainable infrastructure
|Early stage product development||Grant funding||Operational support||Long run sustainability|
|The early stages of project development will be supported through the IDC and second phase of the IETF||Grant funding will be provided by CCUS infrastructure fund and the Net Zero Hydrogen Fund to help with initial project costs||Business models will provide the commercial framework to allow projects to be economically viable||We will support the development of a low carbon products market as set out in the Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy|
Funding innovative projects is an important tool for us to develop, demonstrate and reduce the costs of industrial decarbonisation technologies. We are funding industrial fuel switching solutions, CCUS technologies, and energy efficiency projects. The outcomes from funding these projects will be an increased uptake of industrial decarbonisation technologies by UK industry; improved effectiveness of targeted funding since more viable technologies are available; and the increased likelihood of achieving our decarbonisation goals.
To ensure industrial decarbonisation technologies exist that increase the likelihood of achieving this we need to deploy funds to innovative projects now and in the future across a number of different technologies, sectors and locations.
Develop, demonstrate and reduce the costs of industrial decarbonisation technologies through government funded competitions
- as part of the £1 billion Net Zero Innovation Portfolio develop and deploy industrial innovation funding competitions in areas like industrial fuel switching, CCUS innovation, and industrial energy efficiency
- support research and innovation through the Industrial Decarbonisation Research and Innovation Centre
Investment and finance
Supporting industry in deploying the low carbon technologies that will reduce the embedded carbon in industrial products is a key activity to reach net zero. The cost of deploying these technologies needs to be shared between government, industry and consumers of industrial products. In most cases, low carbon industrial products will be more expensive than their higher carbon alternative initially. Although research suggests that the price increase on final products will be relatively low, (Energy Transition Commission, Mission Possible, 2018) there is still a risk that low carbon industry could be undercut by cheaper high carbon imports, especially since many purchasing decisions are driven by price. Currently, there is not sufficient demand for low carbon products, and the public do not have access to information about the environmental impact of the products they buy, even if they were willing to pay more for them.
In the long-term, it is our ambition that deployment of low carbon technologies does not require public subsidy. To get to this stage, we must both reduce the costs of decarbonisation technology and create demand for low carbon products.
Put in place long-term, sustainable business models to support investment in industrial decarbonisation technologies
To support investment in industrial decarbonisation technologies we will:
- publish an update in the second quarter of 2021 and finalise, by 2022, the commercial framework to incentivise deployment of industry carbon capture by the mid-2020s
- seek to stimulate private sector investment in low carbon hydrogen deployment by development of a low carbon hydrogen business model. We will consult on a ‘preferred’ business model in 2021 and look to finalise the model by 2022
Create demand for low carbon industrial products
To support the development of a market for low carbon industrial products by 2022 we will:
- outline our strategic approach to a range of policy objectives, including supporting the development of a market for low carbon products within the Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy
- consult on defining low carbon products in 2021/2 with a view to being able to set these definitions in the mid-2020s
- develop a proposal for introducing voluntary product standards across key intermediary industrial products by 2025
- develop a proposal for a new labelling system for intermediary industrial products reflecting their impact on the environment in the mid-2020s
Skills and supply chain capability
As the UK industrial sector transitions to net-zero, there will need to be a corresponding transition in the skills of the workforce, and a supply chain to match. We need to ensure that existing workers transition to the industry of the future, and that new workers are being trained with suitable skills. The requirement of trained technical and managerial personnel in industrial decarbonisation could be a barrier to its long-term success if not addressed.
Delivering our goals will require clusters, the supply chain, and other local stakeholders to work together to deliver industrial decarbonisation projects. Achieving this capability is a considerable delivery and coordination challenge that will require collaboration between industry and government.
Support the development of the supply chain capability requirements for a net zero carbon cluster
To support the development of a UK based supply chain for industrial decarbonisation we will:
- by 2022 we will set out the role for government in ensuring that the supply chain can meet the goals of decarbonisation while providing maximum growth opportunities for the UK
- develop jobs and skills pathways in low carbon industrial technologies
To support the transition to clean jobs we will:
- map the skills requirement for a net-zero industrial sector by the end of 2021
- work together with industry, local government and the education sector to invest in the skills needed to support good, green jobs in the clusters
Summary table of actions
|Action/Deliverable||Timeframes||Activity in 2021/22|
|Invest £132 million by 2024 to demonstrate and validate at-scale decarbonisation through the UKRI-led Industrial Decarbonisation Challenge||2024||Early stage of phase 2 projects.|
|Invest £8 million for clusters to develop comprehensive blueprints to achieve net zero emissions.||2024||Early stage of phase 2 projects.|
|Support the deployment of infrastructure at two carbon capture clusters by the mid 2020s through the CCS Infrastructure Fund. A further two clusters will be supported to deployment by 2030.||2030||CCUS Infrastructure Fund design.|
|Deploy a £240 million Net Zero Hydrogen Fund for capital co-investment in new low carbon hydrogen production.||2024/5||Engagement with industry on scheme design. More details will be included in the UK Hydrogen Strategy.|
|Where possible, seek to optimise the re-use of existing oil and gas infrastructure to reduce the overall costs of CCUS projects.||Ongoing||Engage with industry on the transport and storage regulatory investment model and consideration of re-used assets.|
|Bring forward details in of a revenue mechanism to bring through private sector investment into industrial carbon capture and hydrogen projects via our new business models to support these projects.||Ongoing||Bring forward details in 2021.|
|As part of Project Speed, determine how the efficiency of the planning system can be improved to deploy low carbon infrastructure in clusters.||Ongoing||Develop associated workstreams.|
|Engage clusters to determine whether there are non-physical infrastructure requirements to enable the deployment of shared infrastructure and the potential role of government to support this.||2022||Conduct a review of non-physical infrastructure requirements|
|Deploy £315 million of funding for energy efficiency and decarbonisation projects.||2024||IETF second phase.|
|Deploy the £66 million Transforming Foundation Industries Challenge to reduce energy and resource in the UK’s foundation industries.||2021||Funding calls to be launched in 2021.|
|Develop a policy framework to facilitate greater resource efficiency in industry.||2025||Evaluate the role of resource efficiency in industrial decarbonisation.|
|Seek to incentivise industry to practice industrial symbiosis.||2025||Run a discovery project to better understand the role of industrial symbiosis.|
|Develop and deploy industrial innovation funding competitions in areas like industrial fuel switching, green distilleries, CCUS innovation, and industrial energy efficiency.||Ongoing||Develop associated workstreams.|
|Support research and innovation through the Industrial Decarbonisation Research and Innovation Centre.||2024||Further stand up activity|
|Finalise the commercial framework to incentivise deployment of industry carbon capture by the mid-2020s.||2022||Finalisation of the commercial framework.|
|Seek to stimulate private sector investment in low carbon hydrogen deployment by development of a low carbon Hydrogen business model progressing work to assess potentially viable business models.||2022||Consult on a preferred low carbon hydrogen business model with an aim to finalise by the end of 2022.|
|Outline our strategic approach to a range of policy objectives, including supporting the development of a market for low carbon goods within the Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy.||2021||Publication of Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy.|
|We will develop our evidence base on defining low carbon products in 2021/2 with a view to being able to set these definitions in the mid-2020s.||Mid 2020s||Call for evidence on defining low carbon products in 2021/2.|
|We will develop a proposal for the introduction of voluntary product standards across key intermediary industrial products by 2025.||2025||We will begin designing a framework for setting low carbon product standards in 2022.|
|We will develop a proposal for a new labelling system for intermediary industrial products reflecting their impact on the environment in the mid-2020s.||Mid 2020s||We will assess the impact of this labelling system, including the costs and benefits in the early 2020s.|
|By 2022 we will consider the role of the Department in ensuring that the supply chain can meet the goals of decarbonisation while providing maximum growth opportunities for the UK.||2022||Consider the policies required to develop the supply chain to support the decarbonisation of industry.|
|Map the skills requirement for a net-zero industrial sector.||2021||Develop our understanding of the skills needed in a decarbonised industrial sector, and how best to develop them.|
Annex 4: Industry decarbonisation pathways technical annex
We have used a model of the UK industrial sector to generate plausible pathways that will help us to understand when, where and how to act to achieve a net zero industry by 2050. The model was developed by Element Energy for BEIS and the Climate Change Committee (CCC) and was used to underpin the manufacturing and construction sector analysis in the CCC’s Sixth Carbon Budget report (CCC, Sixth Carbon Budget, 2020).
Each pathway presented in this Technical Annex shows a possible route to net zero for a given set of assumptions. These are not intended to represent a predicted or forecasted pathway but instead consider a set of plausible pathways that industry might follow to reach net zero. The different pathway options allow exploration of different questions; consideration of the choices we face and improved understanding of the actions we need to take now to reach the 2050 target.
We have supplemented the pathways analysis with other sources of evidence to build a full picture of the challenges faced by industry. We recognise this picture of how industry could decarbonise will evolve over time as our understanding of these technologies and industries develop.
Method and assumptions
The analysis presented in this Technical Annex uses a pathway model (Net Zero Industrial Pathways, NZIP) that uses a least cost approach to test the social economic value of different measures to decarbonise industrial processes across UK Industrial sites. The industries in scope were categorised into 14 sectors, each with defined process archetypes and assumptions made regarding suitability for decarbonisation technologies.
The pathway modelling is built on the same assumptions as those used in the analysis by the CCC. Where there are differences these are set out below:
|Fuel prices||HMG Green Book LRVC electricity for Industry (central) (BEIS, Green Book supplementary guidance, 2012)|
|Blue and green hydrogen wholesale costs||Internal BEIS analysis|
|Supply chain constraints||BEIS UK Times (UCL & BEIS, UK TIMES) model|
N-ZIP Model (Element Energy, 2020) [footnote 14]
- Industrial emissions and fuel use projections
- Infrastructure requirements and cost
- NPV calculation for decarbonisation options
- Site decision making criteria
- Constraints application
- Infrastructure sizing
[if necessary back to Step 2: Infrastructure requirements and costs]
- Final decarbonisation pathway
- Sites are grouped by geography and represented by their current and projected emissions.
- The model is spatially aware, allowing it to calculate infrastructure costs specific for each site. The further a site is from infrastructure such as a hydrogen network or CO2 injection point the more expensive it is to transport CO2 or hydrogen by road.
- The model categorises each process (e.g. direct high temperature) and determines the suitable decarbonisation technologies, based on this categorisation. The model then calculates, for each process, which of the suitable technologies is most cost effective to deploy and in which year it is most beneficial to deploy.
There are many different paths that industry can take to reduce its emissions, each has a different technology mix and different sequencing of events. The pathway that industry will follow will ultimately be determined by the choices that each individual industrial site makes. A site’s choice can be influenced by several factors, including its location, its business model and the choices made by surrounding sites.
Industry itself is constantly evolving. Over the period covered by this strategy, it is highly likely that new sectors will emerge while others may decline. The pathways formed for this strategy assume that industry broadly follows[footnote 15] the projections set out in the BEIS Energy and Emissions Projections, 2019.
The analysis that underpins this strategy relies on several assumptions and simplifications which are also subject to uncertainty. For example, the model assumes that each industrial site maximises its net present value (NPV), with perfect information available to it. The NPV can be affected by the price of fuel and the assumed societal cost of emitting carbon dioxide, among other factors.
To manage this uncertainty, a range of pathways have been used to develop this strategy. These are encapsulated by the plausible world scenarios shown in Figure 2.
Cluster Networks restrict the availability of carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) and hydrogen fuel switching to industrial sites that sit within the following geographic locations:
- South Wales
These industrial clusters are reflective of the six major industrial sites across the UK plus other sites that could utilise hydrogen/CCS infrastructure (see page vi of Deep-Decarbonisation Pathways for UK Industry (Element Energy) for further information).
The Cluster Networks scenario assumes industrial sites within a 25 km radius of these locations have access to dedicated pipe networks for CO2 and hydrogen transport and storage. Sites that sit outside of these clusters are not able to decarbonise with CCUS, hydrogen or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). This means the extent to which CCUS and hydrogen can be utilised to decarbonise Industry is distinctly lower than under the National Networks scenario set out below. Sites beyond the reach of deep decarbonisation infrastructure must rely on electrification, resource efficiency, energy efficiency and materials substitution to reduce their emissions. Consequently, some dispersed sites with significant process emissions are unlikely to reach a net zero compliant end state by 2050 under this scenario.
National Networks assume full UK supply, distribution, and storage of hydrogen and CO2 enabling Industry to choose any appropriate decarbonisation technology irrespective of where they are located geographically. This pathway considers all technically viable options to decarbonise industrial processes. The only geographic consideration is the cost of building or transporting[footnote 16] hydrogen or carbon dioxide to relevant sites.
Resource and energy efficiency and materials substitution
Resource and energy efficiency and materials substitution are taken as an assumed proportion of industry emissions and subtracted from projected emissions before the pathway model considers how to decarbonise remaining emissions through deep decarbonisation processes (i.e. fuel switching and CCUS).
Resource efficiency is achieved by using raw materials more efficiently in production and from end-users consuming new products more efficiently. This may involve keeping products and materials in use for longer through reuse, repair and recycling, and also reducing the level of material used in the products that we produce. Resource efficiency can also involve new approaches such as industrial symbiosis, which connects material and waste flows between sites, using the waste products from one process as inputs in another.
Energy efficiency is achieved by using inputs more efficiently to reduce energy consumption and consequent emissions. Measures include process and equipment upgrades, installing/improving heat recovery systems, and clustering / networking with other sites and businesses to efficiently utilise waste heat and other by-products. The underpinning evidence stems from the BEIS roadmaps (BEIS; DECC, Industrial Decarbonisation and Energy Efficiency Roadmaps to 2050, 2015) with interpretation by the CCC.
The CCC estimate savings from materials substitution in manufacturing and construction. This is most relevant for cement manufacturing and construction sectors.
Table 1: Resource efficiency and materials substitution, and energy efficiency savings under the balanced pathway scenario for manufacturing and construction (CCC, Sixth Carbon Budget, 2020).
|Area||Annual Industry emission savings (MtCO2e) by 2050|
|Resource efficiency and materials substitution[footnote 17]||9|
|Energy efficiency[footnote 18]||4|
The following results present the differences between the National Networks and Cluster Networks scenarios. The baseline emissions and assumed level of resource and energy efficiency determine the extent to which residual emissions require deep decarbonisation options to reach net zero. The scenarios attempt to reach net zero through fuel switching, CCUS and resource and energy efficiency.
National Networks scenario
The National Networks scenario allows the possibility of hydrogen and CCUS decarbonisation options to all industrial sites across the UK for industrial processes that are suitable for these technologies. Other fuel switching options are also made available with the one exception that hydrogen and electric arc furnace are specifically chosen and deployed to large iron and steel sites.
The National Networks scenario enables a broadly net zero compliant pathway by 2050 with UK industrial residual emissions of 3 MtCO2e. Hydrogen is favoured over electrification in most fuel switching cases owing to cost and contributes most to decarbonising emissions (18 MtCO2e) followed by CCUS/BECCS (11 MtCO2e) and electricity (5 MtCO2e).
The model assumes a carbon price, which is a key determinate affecting the speed of uptake because it affects the social cost effectiveness of each decarbonisation option. In practice, lots of other factors will determine the actual speed of decarbonisation such as market factors, technological innovation, demand changes, supply chain constraints and government policies.
National networks scenario: Carbon abated (MtCO2e) per year by 2050
(figures are rounded)
Cluster Networks scenario
This scenario assumes industrial CCUS technology and hydrogen are available in cluster sites only. Industry sites that fall within 25 km of a CO2 injection point (see CCUS Infrastructure map on page 145) can access CCUS technology and hydrogen fuel supply to potentially decarbonise their industrial process.
Sites in non-clustered ‘dispersed’ locations are assumed to be isolated from potential CO2 and hydrogen transport infrastructure and therefore do not have CCUS or hydrogen as a decarbonisation option.
The Cluster Networks scenario decarbonises industrial emissions to a lesser extent (-7 MtCO2e) than the National Networks scenario which is a consequence of the unavailability of CCUS in dispersed sites.
Fuel switching to electrification plays a more significant role (12 MtCO2e) because of the unavailability of hydrogen in dispersed sites. Despite being restricted to clustered sites and Iron and steel, fuel switching to hydrogen contributes savings of 7 MtCO2e compared to 18 MtCO2e in National Networks.
Cluster Networks Scenario: Carbon abated (MtCO2) per year by 2050
(figures are rounded)
Deep decarbonisation technologies
The following results show the extent to which different deep decarbonisation technologies help Industry to decarbonise across the different plausible world scenarios.
Role of hydrogen
The extent to which Industry uses hydrogen for industrial heat or processes depends on two key considerations within the pathways analysis:
1. Availability within and outside of clusters
2. The technology choices made by iron and steel industry
The National Networks scenario sees the most hydrogen utilisation of 86 TWh by 2050. In this scenario hydrogen is available to all industrial sites and the Iron and steel sector opts to decarbonise through the DRI and EAF route (see Iron and steel section for further explanation). This compares to 24 TWh under the Cluster Network where hydrogen is restricted, and Iron and steel sector chooses CCUS to abate process emissions.
- 10-16 TWh of hydrogen use in Industry by 2030
- 20-34 TWh is achieved by 2035
- Total hydrogen use in industry ranges between 24 and 86 TWh by 2050
- The sectors that consume the most hydrogen are: chemicals, iron and steel, refining, paper, other minerals and food and drink.
Fuel switching requires industrial processes to switch from fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas to low carbon fuels such as electricity, biomass and hydrogen. The proportion of industrial energy consumption that is projected to switch to low carbon fuels between 2020 and 2050 is shown in the chart below.
- Between 51 to 57% of Industrial energy is decarbonised from fuel switching by 2035
- Fuel Switching increases to 71-84% by 2050
Carbon Capture and Storage
CCUS is used to abate process emissions from manufacturing such as cement and chemicals. In some cases, Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) is chosen because fuel switching to biomass in conjunction with carbon capture generates negative carbon emissions which are more attractive than CCUS alone from a social economic perspective. Carbon abatement from BECCS and CCUS are presented together to reveal the extent of carbon capture abatement to industry emissions.
- Around 3 MtCO2e of annual industrial carbon emissions is captured by 2030. From this point onwards the extent of CCUS varies significantly between the National Networks and Cluster Networks scenarios. At best 15 MtCO2e of annual industrial emissions are captured by CCUS by 2040 compared to ~ 9 MtCO2e under the Cluster Network scenario in which Iron and Steel chooses EAF and DRI. The sectors where CCUS carbon abatement is highest are: refineries, chemicals, cement, glass and lime.
Deep dive into industry segments
Industrial energy use and emissions[footnote 19] are highly diverse, with significant variation in how and why emissions happen, even within sectors or locations. This section explores decarbonisation challenges and options across five industry segments.
|Segment||Emissions in 2017 (MtCO2e)20||Common challenges|
|Less energy‑intensive dispersed sites (food & drink, other industry)||17||Not likely to be geographically concentrated making it harder to access hydrogen and CO2 networks. Energy costs are a relatively small part of their overall cost base providing less incentive to decarbonise.|
|Dispersed cement||4||Geographically dispersed and significant distances away from CO2 transport and storage points. Significant amounts of process emissions requiring CCUS to capture emissions.|
|Cluster (All sectors except iron and steel within 25km of a cluster)||25||Predominately the petro-chemicals sectors (refineries and chemicals sector), clustered around CO2 Transport and Storage points|
|High energy dispersed sites:
(ammonia, ethelene, lime, glass, other minerals, paper, refining, other chemicals, non‑ferrous metal)
|12||Not likely to be geographically concentrated making it harder to access hydrogen and CO2 networks.|
|Iron and steel||12||Iron and steel face particular issues with decarbonising blast furnaces and other highly specialised processes.|
Clusters considered in this analysis are any industrial site (except for iron and steel) that sit within 25 km of potential CO2 injection points located at major ports[footnote 22] across the UK. For example, industrial sites within 25km of Teesside are considered to be within an industrial cluster.
The chemical, cement and refinery industries are most prevalent in clusters.
Emissions in these sectors typically arise from process emissions that require CCUS as the only technological solution (in the absence of innovations that offer lower carbon material).
CCUS can benefit significantly from economies of scale. This means sites clustered near to a CO2 injection point could benefit from access to a large-scale infrastructure project such as CO2 transport and storage.
- The CCUS option is the predominant technology solution to abate process emissions in clusters (~ 6 MtCO2 including BECCS).
- BECCS is used in situations that allow for combustion of biomass in place of traditional fossil fuels in glass, lime, cement and paper industries. BECCS is chosen instead of CCUS alone because improvement in carbon cost effectiveness arises from negative emissions. Hydrogen (~ 20TWh) is favoured over electrification for processes requiring heat which is typical in food and drink, automotive, chemicals, and paper industries.
Clusters: Emissions abated (MtCO2e) each year by 2050
(figures are rounded)
|Emissions abated in Clusters||11||6||1||3||0|
Dispersed cement sector
Fully decarbonising cement generally requires CCUS for the process emissions and another technology for the heat.[footnote 23] The critical issue is that most cement plants are far away from CO2 storage sites posing cost, distributional and technical challenges. For example, Rugby cement is 150km from Humberside through central England, Hope is 70 to 100km from either Humber or Merseyside, through the Peak District (some cement sites are closer to clusters).
Around half of cement emissions are reduced by Resource and Energy Efficiency (REEE).
Deep decarbonisation technologies, for example CCUS, will be required to abate process emissions in the cement production industry. BECCS is chosen for fuel switching because biomass is considered suitable in cement heat applications.
There are practical considerations for building a CO2 network (or alternative transportation methods) to such geographically dispersed sites.
The CCUS/BECCS solutions are not available under the cluster scenario, meaning that advances in REEE will only achieve a 50% reduction in emissions by 2050.
In practice the technical options for the cement sector (particularly those that are located away from CO2 injection points) are:
- Building onshore pipelines or other transportation
- Focus on innovation and switching to green cement (e.g. using alternatives to Portland cement such as pozzolans).
Dispersed cement sector: Carbon abated (MtCO2e) each year by 2050 (figures are rounded)
Less energy‑intensive dispersed sites
Less energy‑intensive dispersed sites are those that sit outside clusters and are not considered to be energy‑intensive because their energy costs comprise a smaller proportion of their output. Sectors in scope include ‘food and drink’ and ‘other industries’ such as the automotive industry.
These sites typically require natural gas to run their industrial processes so hydrogen is a natural contender to decarbonise industrial heat. However, the supply of hydrogen is dependent on the ability to supply it to dispersed sites. The NZIP model considers costs of transporting or distributing CO2 and hydrogen via:
- building dedicated networks
- repurposing the gas grid.
A fourth option might be to produce hydrogen locally, but this isn’t explicitly considered in the analysis.
- Electrification poses a more expensive fuel switching option leading to widespread adoption of hydrogen in the National Network scenario
- However, if hydrogen is unavailable then electrification is the only fuel switching option to dispersed sites under the Cluster Network scenario. Some sites may not fuel switch to electricity if the costs are excessively prohibitive or the process is unsuitable for electrification
- Decarbonisation of this segment begins at pace in the late 2030s once the enabling infrastructure has been put in place. Alternative deployment profiles may exist depending on the infrastructure configuration for hydrogen (e.g. extent of local hydrogen production)
Less energy‑intensive dispersed sites: Emissions abated (MtCO2e) each year by 2050 (figures are rounded)
High energy dispersed sites
High energy dispersed sites are those in the chemical, refinery, glass, lime, metal and paper industries. The variety of these heterogenous sectors require a range of technology solutions to decarbonise them.
- Under the National Network scenario all technology options are used to decarbonise high energy dispersed sites.
- The cluster network scenario reveals the consequence of removing CCUS/BECCS and hydrogen options for these dispersed sites because they no longer fully decarbonise (around 4 MtCO2e of residual emissions remain by 2050):
- Hydrogen is substituted for electrification in sectors such as the Paper industry but not in sectors such as non-ferrous metal that require higher grades of industrial heat
- Lime, chemicals and glass manufacturing requiring carbon capture to abate process emissions no longer fully decarbonise
High energy dispersed sites: Emissions abated (MtCO2e) each year by 2050 (figures are rounded)
Iron and steel
Emissions from the iron and steel sector are dominated by two industrial sites in Scunthorpe and Port Talbot in South Wales. These two sites alone produced 11 MtCO2e in 2017, 95% of the total emissions from the iron and steel sector and around 15% of total industrial emissions. Other emissions from the sector are from numerous smaller sites. The highly concentrated nature of the iron and steel sector presents both challenges and opportunities in decarbonisation, with both shared and differing challenges existing in the two main sites.
Two of the major decarbonisation options considered for both sites are:
- Deployment of CCUS
- Electric Arc Furnaces with hydrogen replacing conventional feedstocks (i.e. coal) for use in direct reduced iron process. Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) are used instead of traditional blast furnaces which might be considered a process change rather than fuel switching (A switch of fuel takes place but a new EAF is also required to replace the blast furnace).
Under the EAF and DRI option Electric Arc Furnace is deployed during the early 2030s alongside hydrogen feedstocks for use in direct reduced iron processes. The speed at which these processes deployed is determined by the carbon price assumed in the model. In practice the timing of such events will be driven by decisions taken by industry.
Under the CCUS option a minimal amount of fuel switching to hydrogen takes place and process emissions are sequestered through carbon capture and storage.
The EAF and DRI option face the following considerations:
- EAF requires relatively high electricity use with impacts on electricity capacity and connection requirements.
- The source of hydrogen needs to be low carbon and will depend on the infrastructure built in South Wales and Humberside.
The CCUS option faces the following considerations:
- Both sites face the challenges associated with retrofitting carbon capture units to existing infrastructure which is both costly and will not fully decarbonise all emissions.
- The Scunthorpe site does have the option to use a Humberside carbon transport and storage network. In contrast, the Port Talbot site would not have access to such a network, meaning the predominant transport option being considered at present is shipping CO2 to the North West cluster.
Iron and steel: Emissions abated (MtCO2e) each year by 2050 (figures are rounded)
|Cluster networks (EAF and DRI)||8||–||–||4||4|
|Cluster networks (CCUS)||8||7||–||<1||0|
|Advanced Nuclear||Includes Small Modular and Advanced Modular Reactors.|
|Advanced Nuclear Reactors||Reactors which use novel cooling systems or fuels and may offer new functionalities (such as industrial process heat).|
|Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage||Refers to bioenergy processes (such as burning it for electricity) during which carbon is captured and stored. If carefully managed, using sustainable biomass, BECCS can generate ‘negative emissions’ because while providing energy it also it also captures and stores the atmospheric CO2 that is absorbed by plants as they grow.|
|Bioenergy||Refers to heat or electricity produced using biomass or gaseous and liquid fuels with a biological origin such as biomethane produced from biomass.|
|Biomass||Refers to any material of biological origin used as a feedstock for products (e.g. wood in construction to make chemicals and materials, like bio-based plastics), or as a fuel for bioenergy (heat, electricity and gaseous fuels such as biomethane and hydrogen) or biofuels (transport fuels).|
|Biomethane||Methane gas that is produced by processing biomass. It can be used for the same purposes as natural gas, like producing electricity or heat, and can use the same infrastructure for transmission and end-user equipment.|
|Carbon intensity||The amount of CO2 emitted per unit of product manufactured or unit of electricity generated.|
|Carbon capture readiness||When a plant is designed or modified so that it can be easily retrofitted with carbon capture technology at a later stage. Factors that can impact carbon capture readiness include: technology choice, equipment sizing, physical space and the layout of a plant.|
|Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage (CCUS)||The process of capturing carbon dioxide from industrial processes, power generation, certain hydrogen production methods and greenhouse gas removal technologies such as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage and direct air capture. The captured carbon dioxide is then either used, for example in chemical processes, or stored permanently in disused oil and gas fields or naturally occurring geological storage sites.|
|Carbon leakage||Refers to the situation where policies achieve their goal of lowering emissions in one jurisdiction but drive some companies to move production or reallocate investment to other countries with less ambitious greenhouse gas emissions reduction policies.
This could lead to an increase in overall global emissions, and a worse outcome for climate change.
|Carbon price||A cost applied to carbon pollution to encourage polluters to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases they emit into the atmosphere.|
|Clean electricity||Types of electricity generating technologies that emit little or no fossil fuel derived greenhouse gas from generation.|
|Clean Energy Ministerial||Multilateral forum to promote policies and programs that advance clean energy technology.|
|Climate Change Committee||CCC is an independent, statutory body established to advise the UK and devolved governments on emission targets and to report to Parliament on progress made in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and preparing for and adapting to the impacts of climate change.|
|Conference of Parties (COP)||COP refers to the decision-making body of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
In November 2021, the UK will be hosting the 26th annual session of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention, or “COP26”, in Glasgow.
|Consumer product (also referred to as a final product)||A product which, once purchased, is consumed or used directly by the purchaser and is not sold on or used in the manufacture of another product.|
|Contracts for Difference Scheme (CfD)||The main support mechanism for large scale low-carbon electricity generation projects. Successful projects are awarded a long-term contract which secures a price to which they will either be topped up if electricity prices are low or pay back to if electricity prices are high.|
|Decarbonisation||A process of reducing the amount of carbon dioxide we release into the atmosphere.|
|Demand-side measures/policies||Policies that aim to increase overall demand for a product or service.|
|Demand side response (solutions)||Is when consumers adjust their energy usage in response to an external signal. Examples include either reducing it, delaying it, or using on-site generation or storage. DSR was historically provided by large industrial and commercial consumers, but technology development is making it easier for smaller consumers to provide these services for example by charging their electric car with a smart charger.|
|Digitalisation||Is the integration of digital technologies into a process, organisation, or system. For example, smart meters which automatically send meter readings to energy suppliers, meaning more accurate bills for customers.|
|Direct air carbon capture and storage||Use of engineered processes to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) directly from the atmosphere, for storage or use.|
|Dispersed sites||Industrial sites located outside of industrial clusters.|
|Distribution networks||Regional networks that transport gas or electricity into homes and businesses and import electricity from small-scale generation.|
|Electrification||Switching from using fuels such as gas or petroleum, to using electricity. For example, switching from a gas boiler to an electric boiler for raising steam in industry.|
|Embodied emissions (or embodied carbon)||The sum of all the emissions produced in the manufacture of a product. This includes emissions from the extraction and transportation of raw materials, and the manufacturing processes used to create the final product.|
|Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)||Provides a long-term carbon price signal for UK heavy industry, aviation and power sectors to incentivise sector decarbonisation and support the UK to meet its legally binding carbon reduction targets.|
|Energy data||Historical, current, and future information covering things such as how, where and when energy is generated, transported, used, and stored.|
|Energy efficiency||When something performs better using the same amount of energy, or delivers the same performance for less. The principle of energy efficiency can be applied to many things: buildings, products, appliances, manufacturing processes, to name a few.|
|Energy Performance Contract||An approach designed to assist public sector organisations retrofit their buildings by installing energy conservation measures to reduce carbon emissions and achieve substantial guaranteed annual cost savings|
|Engineering standards||The specifications to which the energy system is designed and operated.|
|Environmental Product Declarations||A transparent, objective, comparable report, which is independently verified, that communicates what a product is made of and how it impacts the environment across its entire life cycle.|
|EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)||Policy proposed by the EU as part of the Green New Deal to put a carbon price on imports of certain goods from outside the EU to mitigate the risk of carbon leakage.|
|Freeports||A Freeport is usually defined as a place to carry out business inside a country’s land border but where different customs rules apply.|
|Flexibility||The ability to change generation and/or demand in response to an external signal (e.g. price or contract terms). Flexibility enabling technologies include batteries, demand side response, interconnectors and fossil fuel generators.|
|Fossil fuels||Oil (and fuels derived from oil), coal and natural gas.|
|Greenhouse Gas Emissions||Addition to the atmosphere of gases that are a cause of global warming, including carbon dioxide, methane and others.|
|Greenhouse Gas Removal Technologies (or negative emissions)||Methods that actively remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, ranging from engineered to nature-based solutions.|
|Gross value added (GVA)||Gross value added is the value generated by any unit engaged in the production of goods and services.|
|Heat network||A heat network, sometimes called district heating, is a system of insulated pipes that takes heat or cooling generated from a central source and distributes it to a number of domestic and non-domestic buildings.|
|Heat pump||A device that extracts heat from the air, ground or water and concentrates it to a higher temperature and delivers it elsewhere, for example to a central heating system. It can replace traditional fossil fuel heating, such as a gas or oil boiler. Heat pump systems are designed to extract a greater amount of heat energy from the surrounding environment than the energy they consume in doing so, therefore they can act as a more efficient source of heat than a conventional electric heater, producing two to three times (or more for very efficient systems) as much heat output as they consume in electricity input.|
|High Potential Opportunities (HPOs)||High Potential Opportunities (HPOs) are one of several investment support programmes designed to promote foreign investment into innovative areas of the economy.|
|Hydrogen for heat||The combustion of hydrogen produces no long-lived greenhouse gas emissions at point of use, making it a possible low-carbon replacement for natural gas as a fuel source for heating homes and other buildings.|
|Low carbon hydrogen||Hydrogen that is produced with significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions compared to current methods of production – methods include reacting methane with steam to form hydrogen and then capturing the carbon dioxide by-product (steam methane reformation with CCUS) or using renewable electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen (electrolysis).|
|Industrial cluster||Places where related industries have co-located. Clustered industrial sectors tend to be those that required energy-intensive manufacturing processes, specifically: chemicals, glass, oil refining, paper and pulp, and iron and steel.|
|Industry||Businesses and organisations involved in manufacturing, refining, coke production and mining.|
|Industrial symbiosis||The process by which energy, resource and waste flows are shared between neighbouring industrial facilities, allowing for certain by-products of an industry or industrial process to become the raw materials for another. Application of this concept allows materials to be used in a more sustainable way and contributes to the creation of a circular economy.|
|Intermediary industrial products||A product manufactured from raw materials which goes on to be used in the manufacture of a final product. Examples include steel, cement and glass. (Some products can be both an intermediary product and a final product.)|
|Leadership Group for Industry Transition (LeadIT)||Multilateral group aiming to foster public-private collaboration supported by technical expertise sharing to accelerate the decarbonisation of industry.|
|Low-carbon electricity generating technologies||Types of electricity generating technologies that emit little or no carbon, which include renewables, nuclear, CCUS power generation.|
|Low-carbon industrial product||A product manufactured producing fewer, or even zero, emissions. (This is a working definition for the purpose of this Strategy and will need to be expanded upon, per the discussion in Chapter 3.)
Industrial products range from intermediary materials such as steel, cement and glass, to consumer products such as vehicles and appliances.
|MtCO2||A unit of carbon dioxide: megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent.|
|Market failure||Market failure is where the market mechanism alone cannot achieve economic efficiency.
Economic efficiency is achieved when nobody can be made better off without someone else being made worse off. Economic efficiency enhances social welfare by ensuring resources are allocated and used in the most productive manner possible. One potential cause of inefficiency is when the private returns to an individual or firm from carrying out a particular action or activity differs from the returns to society as a whole, meaning there are external costs or benefits.
|Mission Innovation||Mission Innovation is a global initiative to accelerate public and private clean energy innovation to address climate change, make clean energy affordable to consumers, and create green jobs and commercial opportunities.|
|Mission Possible Partnership||A coalition of public and private partners working on the industry transition to set heavy industry on the pathway towards net-zero emissions by mid-century.|
|Negative emission||Achieved by removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, for example, through direct air capture or bio-energy production with carbon capture.|
|Net zero||Refers to a point at which the amount of greenhouse gas being put into the atmosphere by human activity in the UK equals the amount of greenhouse gas that is being taken out of the atmosphere.|
|The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)||An intergovernmental economic organisation with 37 member countries, which aims to stimulate economic progress and world trade.|
|Paris Agreement||A legally binding international treaty on climate change. It sets out a global framework to avoid dangerous climate change by limiting global warming to well below 2°C and pursuing efforts to limit it to 1.5°C. It also aims to strengthen countries’ ability to deal with the impacts of climate change and support them in their efforts.|
|Policy costs||Cost on energy bills of programmes to save energy, reduce emissions, and provide financial support to the fuel poor.|
|Product labelling||A mark or label on a product’s packaging which conveys information to the consumer about the product’s unique value. For example, a label might signal that a product has been certified as meeting a particular standard.|
|Renewable energy||Energy that is collected from resources which are naturally replaced in human timescales such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides and waves.|
|R&D||Research and development: thinking up new ideas and applying them.|
|Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)||SMRs are usually based on proven water-cooled reactors similar to current Nuclear Power station reactors, but on a smaller scale. They use nuclear fission to generate low-carbon electricity. SMRs are called modular reactors as their components can be manufactured in factories using innovative techniques and then transported to site to be assembled.|
|T Levels||T Levels are technical study programmes for 16 to 19-year-olds which combine classroom learning with a substantive industry placement.|
|Transmission networks||National networks that transport gas and electricity long distances across Great Britain; the motorways of our energy network.|
|TWh||A unit of energy: Terawatt hours|
|United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)||Responsible for coordinating responses to environmental issues within the United Nations system|
|United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)||International environmental treaty addressing climate change and the parent treaty of the 2015 Paris Agreement, signed in 1992.|
|United Nations Industrial Development Organisations (UNIDO)||A specialised agency in the United Nations system that assists countries in economic and industrial development.|
|Voluntary buyers alliance||Two or more organisations combining their purchasing power in order to achieve value for money.|
|Voluntary product standards||Voluntary product standards establish a recommended specification for a particular aspect of a product. Manufacturers can choose whether to meet this standard. Those that do receive certification which demonstrates to consumers the unique quality or value the product has, which differs from others on the market.|
|Wholesale costs||The amount energy companies pay to buy gas and electricity.|
|World Economic Forum (WEF)||An international organisation for public-private cooperation. It engages political, business, cultural, and other leaders in society to shape global, regional and industry agendas.|
|World Trade Organisation||The global international organisation that deals with the rules of trade between nations|
Business in the Community, 2020. Advancing Circular Construction: Case Studies from the building and infrastructure sectors
Carbon Trust, 2012. Steam and high temperature hot water boilers
Cavaliere, P., 2019. Electrolysis of Iron Ores: Most Efficient Technologies for Greenhouse Emissions Abatement. In: Clean Ironmaking and Steelmaking Processes. New York City: Springer, pp. 555-576.
Climate Change Committee, 2017. UK business opportunities of moving to a low carbon economy
Climate Change Committee, 2019. Net Zero: The UK’s contribution to stopping global warming
Climate Change Committee, 2020. Sixth Carbon Budget
Chowdhury, J. I. et al., 2018. Reducing Industrial Energy Demand in the UK: A review of energy efficiency technologies and energy saving potential in selected sectors, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 94, pp. 1153-1179
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy; Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2015. Industrial Decarbonisation and Energy Efficiency Roadmaps to 2050
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2019. Green Book supplementary guidance: valuation of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for appraisal
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2017. Industrial Clusters in England
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2018. Clean Growth – Transforming Heat
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2019. Creating a clean steel fund: call for evidence
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2019. Energy Innovation Needs Assessment, BEIS Research Paper number: 2019/033
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2019. Update energy and emissions projections: 2019
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2020. CCS deployment at dispersed industrial sites, BEIS Research Paper number 2020/30
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2020. Evaluation of the second Climate Change Agreements scheme: Synthesis Report
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2020. Final UK greenhouse gas emissions from national statistics
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2020. Final UK greenhouse gas emissions national statistics: 1990 to 2018 [Accessed 17 02 2021].
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2020. Standard Industrial Classification Emissions Publication 1990-2018 [Accessed 17 02 2020].
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2020. Steel public procurement
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2020. UK Business Competitiveness and the Role of Carbon Pricing
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2017. Clean Growth Strategy
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2017. Industrial Strategy: Building a Britain fit for the future
Department for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs, 2020. Impacts of Net Zero Pathways on future air quality in the UK
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2020. National Statistics: Energy consumption in the UK
Element Energy, 2020. Deep-Decarbonisation Pathways for UK Industry
Energy Transitions Commission, 2018. Mission Possible: reaching net zero carbon emissions from harder-to-abate sectors by mid-century
HM Government, 2020. National Statistics: Energy Consumption in the UK
HM Government, 2020. The Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution
HM Treasury; Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, 2020. Freeports budding prospectus
HM Treasury, 2019. National Statistics: Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2019
International Energy Agency, 2018. Tracking Industry 2020
International Energy Agency, 2020. CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions
Maier, J., 2017. Made Smarter Review
McKinsey and Company, 2020. Plugging In: What electrification can do for industry
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, 2019. English indices of deprivation 2019 [Accessed 15 02 2021].
National Atmospheric Environmental Inventories, 2020. Data [Accessed 17 02 2020]
NOMIS, 2020. Official Labour Market Statistics
Office for National Statistics, 2019. Regional gross value added (balanced) by industry: local authorities by NUTS1 region [Accessed 02 15 2021]
Office for National Statistics, 2019. Regional gross value added (balanced) by industry: local authorities by NUTS1 regions [Accessed 15 02 2021]
Office for National Statistics, 2019. Regional gross value added (balanced) by industry: local authorities by NUTS1 region [Accessed January 2020]
Office for National Statistics, 2019. Workforce jobs data
Office for National Statistics, 2020. Annual Business Survey [Accessed 17 02 2021]
Office for National Statistics, 2020. Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings
Office for National Statistics, 2020. GDP quarterly national accounts time series [Accessed 17 02 2021]
Office for National Statistics, 2020. UK Trade in Goods
Rootzén, J., Johnsson, F., 2016. Managing the costs of CO2 abatement in the cement industry. Energy Policy, pp. 781-800.
Rootzén, J., Johnsson, F., 2016. Paying the full price of steel – Perspectives on the cost of reducing carbon dioxide emissions from the steel industry. Energy Policy, pp. 459-469.
Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, 2016. Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2016 [Accessed 02 15 2021]
Scott, K., Giesekam, J., Barrett, J. & Owen, A., 2018. Bridging the climate mitigation gap with economy-wide material productivity. Wiley Periodicals, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp. 918-931
University College London, UK TIMES
UK in a Changing Europe, 2020. Manufacturing and Brexit
Vivid Economics, 2019. Energy Innovation Needs Assessment: Industry
Vivid Economics, 2019. Energy Innovations Needs Assessment. Sub-theme report: Hydrogen & fuel cells
Vivid Economics, 2020. BEIS ICF Mitigation Investment Options: Opportunity Assessment Reports.
Vivid Economics, 2020. Capturing Carbon at Drax: Delivering Jobs, Clean Growth and Levelling up the Humber
Worldsteel, 2020. Steel Statistical Yearbook
- Less energy‑intensive manufacturing includes the manufacturing of vehicles, wood products, pharmaceuticals and electronics, among other industries. ↩ ↩2
- Throughout this strategy we use carbon equivalent emissions (CO2e) except when specifically referring to CCUS/CO2 capture as these figures have been calculated on the basis of CO2 only ↩
- The definition of industry used in this strategy differs to that used in the Energy White Paper (2020). For more details see Annex 4. ↩
- Industry emissions for these segments were derived from the NZIP model which uses NAEI point source as its main data source which differs slightly to official statistics that are based on Standard Industry Classification codes. ↩
- Carbon dioxide makes up the majority of industrial greenhouse gas emissions, and for simplicity we often refer to “low carbon” technologies and policy levers for industrial decarbonisation. However to meet net zero our emissions will have to reduce across all greenhouse gases, and in this strategy “low carbon” should be read as short hand for low levels of all greenhouse gases. ↩
- Relative to emissions in 2018. ↩
- Feedstock switching is not considered in our modelling but could provide an opportunity for further low carbon hydrogen consumption. ↩
- Where fuel combustion occurs in the same chamber as the chemical reaction. ↩
- The median wage is 45% higher than Yorkshire and Humber, and 47% higher than Wales’ median. ↩
- Middlesbrough, Liverpool, Knowsley, and Kingston upon Hull are the local authorities with the highest proportions of neighbourhoods among the most deprived in England. Port Talbot and Grangemouth are also located to areas of deprivation. According to Index of Multiple Deprivation in England, Scotland, and Wales. ↩
- The median wage is 45% higher than Yorkshire and Humber, and 47% higher than Wales’ median. ↩
- Regional gross value added is the value generated by any unit engaged in the production of goods and services. GVA per head is a useful way of comparing regions of different sizes. It is not, however, a measure of regional productivity (ONS, 2019). Figures include GVA for the Kingston Upon Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, North East Lincolnshire, and North Lincolnshire local authority’s, which the cluster spans. ↩
- £289 million of which will be delivered by BEIS in England, Wales and Northern Ireland through the Industrial Energy Transformation Fund. The remainder will be delivered by the Scottish Government in Scotland through the Scottish IETF. ↩
- Reproduced with permission from Element Energy. ↩
- Adjustments were made to Emissions projections for Chemicals and Refineries sectors to account for market intelligence collected by the CCC. ↩
- Transporting CO2 is done by road or shipping to the nearest cluster site. ↩
- The figures were derived by the CCC based on research from 2018 (Scott, et al., 2018). This research acknowledges that there are a range of possible scenarios that differ greatly in resource efficiency savings. The CCC’s balanced pathway assume savings consistent with the high scenario. Empirical evidence on the likelihood of these scenarios is limited. ↩
- Energy Efficiency is derived after resource efficiency has been deducted from baseline emissions. This means the reported savings from Energy Efficiency could be higher if they were calculated before resource efficiency deductions. ↩
- The definition of industry used in this strategy differs to that used in the Energy White Paper (2020) – this is due to a sectoral approach being followed by this strategy (defined by standard industrial classification codes), as opposed to a process approach applied by the Energy White Paper (defined by IPCC codes). The difference in methodologies mean that the two definitions of industry are not directly comparable, however, the broad differences are that this strategy includes emissions from F-Gases but excludes emissions from construction and other energy supply. ↩
- Industry emissions for these segments were derived from the NZIP model which uses NAEI point source as its main data source which differs slightly to official statistics that are based on Standard Industry Classification codes. ↩
- Numbers may not sum due to rounding. ↩
- CO2 injection points assumed at Londonderry, Grangemouth, St Fergus, South Wales, Teesside, Humberside, Merseyside, Peak District, Southampton and Medway. Sites that are not ports are considered points at which CO2 could be shipped or piped to a nearest port or offshore storage site. ↩
- Assuming the location of businesses stays the same or the fundamental cement production process remain the same. ↩
Fears over increased business rates for UK AD operators
Business rates are an “unacceptable threat” to anaerobic digestion (AD) operators, according to industry representatives, and will hinder the UK’s ability to meet its net-zero targets reports bioenergy-news.com
With charges escalating year-on-year, business rates are now a “real burden” to the AD industry and putting many plants out of business, according to the Anaerobic Digestion and Bioresources Association (ADBA) and renewables consultant Chris Handel. This issue is particularly critical considering the value of AD in addressing climate change, and the UK’s need to decarbonise agriculture, alongside other key sectors of the economy.
HM Revenue & Customs’s (HMRC) Valuation Office Agency (VOA) has been reviewing its business rates assessments and the change of methodology could lead to UK AD plants facing bills they could not meet, resulting in business closures and the loss of an important waste management and decarbonisation service.
There are currently 685 AD plants in the UK treating 46 million tonnes of organic wastes every year and recycling them into biogas and biofertilisers for the energy, transport, heat, and farming sectors. By capturing and transforming organic matter into alternatives to fossil-based energy and fertiliser, the AD industry delivers a 1% reduction in the UK’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions every year – equivalent to taking 2.3 million cars off the road. Fully deployed, ADBA believes the industry could abate the UK’s GHG emissions by 6% by 2030.
“Business rate payers in England have, so far, benefitted from a generous relief scheme under the government’s transitional rates relief scheme,” said Charlotte Morton, ADBA’s chief executive. “But many operators will soon be coming out of this scheme and, for the first time, will face the full impact of the recent rates revaluation.
“This will mean high levels of charges akin to those now levied on AD operators in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. We realise that the tax has to be paid – but it must be fair and reasonable, have regard to a plant’s ability to pay, and fully reflect the challenges of running an AD Plant. ADBA is very concerned about the impact this tax will be having across the industry.”
ADBA has been working with rating practitioner, Chris Handel, in looking to bring the AD industry together to explore how to tackle this issue with the VOA and ensure that business rates remain affordable and fair.
Chris Handel, managing director of Handel Rating Consultants, commented: “Government changes to the calculations used to work out business rates are likely to trigger higher payments for AD plant owners. This feels counter-intuitive at a time when we need to all green the economy.
“I’d urge any AD plant operator receiving a letter about business rates to do two things: firstly, take professional advice, don’t just fill in their form. It could lead to higher tax bills. Secondly, think about joining our formal challenge to the government to seek a fairer deal for the industry.”
Morton added: “We are confident that working together, our concerted action will give us a good opportunity to reset business rate charges to more realistic levels, benefitting not only the whole industry for the life of the plant but also the UK’s efforts to fulfil the country’s ambition to achieve its net-zero targets and address climate change.”
NEST commits £3bn to infrastructure equity for next decade
NEST, the automatic enrolment pension scheme set up by the UK government, is commiting to investing nearly £3bn (€3.5bn) into infrastructure equity by the end of the decade, in the UK and around the world. and appointed CBRE Caledon Capital Management – the private infrastructure investment arm of CBRE Global Investors – and GLIL Infrastructure to help invest.
According to NEST, CBRE Caledon’s mandate will help invest directly in global core and core-plus infrastructure projects, providing NEST with access to an infrastructure fund sponsored by the firm.
There will also be an opportunity to co-invest in select investments to help NEST members take advantage of bigger projects, it added.
As for GLIL Infrastructure, an organisation representing a joint venture between several major local authority pension plans, it will allow NEST to invest in GLIL’s open-ended fund giving access to new opportunities in UK core infrastructure.
GLIL’s investments to date include equity stakes in Anglian Water, Clyde Windfarm, Forth Ports, a rolling stock fleet of 65 intercity trains on the East Coast Mainline, and investments in biomass and anaerobic digestion energy generation, a statement noted.
Along with NEST’s recent announcement of Octopus Renewables, this is the “first time a UK defined contribution pension scheme has been able to significantly invest directly into infrastructure”, NEST announced.
“It represents a major step in the sophistication of NEST’s investment strategy, bringing infrastructure to at least 5% of its total portfolio.”
The scheme is contemplating investing in fibre networks, social housing, water and waste treatment plants, and seaports. Its initial commitment to these investments will be worth £650m, with significant further commitments in subsequent years.
Stephen O’Neill, NEST’s head of private markets, said both fund managers have offered innovative solutions for NEST as both came out top during the procurement process.
“NEST’s investment strategy is evolving at pace in line with the growth in our assets under management, opening up new assets classes in the pursuit of the best risk-adjusted returns for our members,” he said.
“We believe direct infrastructure equity investments can offer diversification benefits and a return premium to public market equities, at lower levels of risk,” he added.
CBRE Caledon and GLIL Infrastructure will make investments directly as owners of infrastructure projects, negotiating bespoke deals and managing the construction and operation of assets so NEST members are suitably rewarded for injecting new funding.
NEST expects to have long-term relationships with both firms, drawing on their expertise to help find lucrative investments that will produce steady, strong returns for years to come, it said.
Andreas Köttering, portfolio manager and head of infrastructure Europe at CBRE Caledon, said: “There is a growing universe of attractive opportunities that benefit from long-term contracts, low elasticity of demand, and resilience to economic downturns. We expect to invest a significant proportion of NEST’s portfolio in a variety of sustainable infrastructure projects, including digital infrastructure, energy, transportation and utilities.”
Ted Frith, chief operating officer at GLIL Infrastructure, added: “Infrastructure investment is absolutely critical to supporting the UK’s recovery and building a sustainable economy for the future, and pension funds like NEST can play a fundamental role in helping to fund those projects.”
About 1st Choice Waste
For industrial and commercial sectors, 1st Choice Waste Management offers efficient management of waste, including hazardous waste, difficult waste, and unique waste. Waste production can vary wildly depending on the type of business; that’s why we work closely with our customers to understand their unique circumstances. From collection to recovery, regardless of the type or volume, we can provide you or your business with the same high standard service that is unmatchable in the North East UK.
We are not just a commercial waste recycling and disposal company. Our biomass boiler is proof of that fact. By converting our waste into energy, our biomass boiler returns clean power to the grid. The way we manage and dispose of waste is changing. Businesses and individuals are constantly looking for more sustainable and responsible ways of disposing of and managing their waste. Our biomass boilers are highly beneficial because they reduce the waste that is generated and produce green electricity back to the grid..
Ben works for the marketing team at 1st Choice Waste Management, he has a passion for marketing and helping businesses to grow.